1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2949-6861
  • E-ISSN: 2949-6845
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dt.00010.das
2024-02-06
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahrens, Barbara, and Marc Orlando
    2022 “Note-taking for consecutive conference interpreting.” InThe Routledge handbook of conference interpreting, edited byMichaela. Albl-Mikasa & Elisabet. Tiselius, 34–48. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajibade, Patrick
    2018 “Technology acceptance model limitations and criticisms: Exploring the practical applications and use in technology-related studies, mixed-method, and qualitative researches.” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 1941 htp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1941
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bragg, Danielle., Verhoef, Tessa, Vogler, Christian, Ringel Morris, Meredith, Koller, Oscar., Bellard, Mary., Berke, Larwan., Boudreault, Patrick., Bratfoort, Annelies., Caselli, Naomi, Huenerfauth, Matt, and Hernisa Kacorri
    2019 “Sign language recognition, generation, and translation: An interdisciplinary perspective.” InThe 21st International Acm Sigaccess Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 16–31. 10.1145/3308561.3353774
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353774 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Jing, and Chao Han
    eds. 2021Testing and assessment of interpreting: Recent developments in China. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑8554‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Coster, Mathieu, Shterionov, Dimitar, Van Herreweghe, Mieke and Joni Dambre
    2023 “Machine translation from signed to spoken languages: State of the art and challenges.” Universal Access in the Information Society. 10.1007/s10209‑023‑00992‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00992-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Estrin, Judy
    2008Closing the innovation gap: Reigniting the spark of creativity in a global economy. New York: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Guistini, Deborah
    2022 “COVID-19 and the configuration of materiality in remote interpreting: Is technology biting back?” InTranslation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19. Corpora and Intercultural Studies, vol91, edited byKanglong Liu, and Andrew K. F. Cheung, 197–213. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑19‑6680‑4_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6680-4_11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Way, Andy, Leeson, Lorraine, and Dimitar Shterionov
    eds. 2024Sign Language Machine Translation. Singapore: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yin, Kayo, Moryossef, Amit, Hochgesang, Julie, Goldberg, Yoav, and Malihe Alikhani
    2021 “Including signed languages in natural language processing.” InProceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, vol11, 7347–7360. aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.570. 10.18653/v1/2021.acl‑long.570
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.570 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/dt.00010.das
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error