oa A digital sociology of interpreting

References

1. Acemoglu, Daron, and James Robinson
   2012 Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers. 10.1355/ae29‑2j
   https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j [Google Scholar]
2. Angelelli, Claudia V.
   2015 “Invisibility.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, –. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Angelelli, Claudia V.
   ed. 2014 The Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.66
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.66 [Google Scholar]
4. Benjamin, Walter
   1968 (2007) Illuminations. Translated byHarry Zohn. Edited byHannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1972 Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédée de trois études d’ethnographie kabyle. Geneva: Droz. 10.3917/droz.bourd.1972.01
   https://doi.org/10.3917/droz.bourd.1972.01 [Google Scholar]
6. Bourdieu, Pierre
   ed. 1993 La Misère du monde. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brandt, John, Kathleen Buckingham, Cody Buntain, Will Anderson, Sabin Ray, John-Rob Pool, and Natasha Ferrari
   2020 “Identifying Social Media User Demographics and Topic Diversity with Computational Social Science: A Case Study of a Major International Policy Forum.” Journal of Computational Social Science(): –. 10.1007/s42001‑019‑00061‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-019-00061-9 [Google Scholar]
8. Braun, Sabine
   2024 “Distance Interpreting as a Professional Profile.” InHandbook of the Language Industry, edited byGary Massey, Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, and Erik Angelone, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110716047‑020
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110716047-020 [Google Scholar]
9. Butler, Judith
   2004 Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky, Aviva
    2021 Central America’s Forgotten History: Revolution, Violence, and the Roots of Migration. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky, Noam
    1989 Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. Boston: South End Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coleman, James S.
    1990 Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Collins, Randall
    2004 Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400851744
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744 [Google Scholar]
14. Criado Perez, Caroline
    2019 Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cronin, Michael, and Carmen Delgado-Luchner
    2021 “Escaping the Invisibility Trap.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal(): –. 10.1177/27523810211033684
    https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810211033684 [Google Scholar]
16. de Beauvoir, Simone
    1949 Le deuxieme sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diaz Fouces, Óscar, and Esther Monzó-Nebot
    eds. 2010 Applied Sociology in Translation Studies / Sociologia aplicada a la traducció. Special issue ofMonti. 10.6035/MonTI.2010.2
    https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2010.2 [Google Scholar]
18. DiMaggio, Paul
    1997 “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology: –. 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 [Google Scholar]
19. Donovan, Clare, and Cecilia Manzoni
    2024 “Remote Interpreting: A Game-changer for Interpreters?” The Interpreters’ Newsletter: –.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fantinuoli, Claudio, and Vorya Dastyar
    2022 “Interpreting and the Emerging Augmented Paradigm.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal(): –. 10.1177/27523810221111631
    https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810221111631 [Google Scholar]
21. Fantinuoli, Claudio
    2018 “Interpreting and Technology: The Upcoming Technological Turn.” InInterpreting and Technology, edited byClaudio Fantinuoli, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fraser, Nancy
    2013 Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
23. García-González, Marta
    2025 “Gender Vias in Translation Automation: Addressing Bias and Inequality.” InThe Social Impact of Automating Translation: An Ethics of Care Perspective on Machine Translation, edited byEsther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003465522‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003465522-6 [Google Scholar]
24. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gentile, Paola
    2014 “The Conflict Between Interpreters’ Role and Status: A Socio-historical Perspective.” In(Re)visiting Ethics and Ideology in Situations of Conflict, edited byCarmen Valero-Garcés, –. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gile, Daniel
    2012 “Institutionalization of Translation Studies.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, edited byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.3.ins2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.3.ins2 [Google Scholar]
27. Gilligan, Carol
    2014 “Moral Injury and the Ethic of Care: Reframing the Conversation about Differences.” In “Democratic Citizenship and the Recognition of Cultural Differences,” edited byCarol Gould, Adam Etinson, and Joshua Keton. Special issue, Journal of Social Philosophy(): –. 10.1111/josp.12050
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12050 [Google Scholar]
28. Giustini, Deborah
    2018 Towards a Sociology of Interpreting: The Embedded Strangers. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Giustini, Deborah
    2024a “Towards a Sociological Redressing of Interpreters’ (In)visibility?” InBeyond the Translator’s Invisibility. Critical Reflections and New Perspectives, edited byPeter J. Freeth and Rafael Treviño, –. Leuven: Leuven University Press. 10.2307/jj.9827043.7
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9827043.7 [Google Scholar]
30. Giustini, Deborah
    2024b “‘You Can Book an Interpreter the Same Way You Order Your Uber’: (Re)interpreting Work and Digital Labour Platforms.” Perspectives(): –. 10.1080/0907676X.2023.2298910
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2298910 [Google Scholar]
31. Giustini, Deborah
    2024c “Women’s Challenges and Gender Inequality Implications in the UK Home Office’s Streamlined Asylum Process: A Practice-Based Posthuman Perspective.” Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, Revista de Drets Lingüístics i Minories(): –. 10.7203/Just.3.28153
    https://doi.org/10.7203/Just.3.28153 [Google Scholar]
32. Giustini, Deborah, and Vorya Dastyar
    2024 “Critical AI Literacy (CAIL) for Interpreting in the Age of AI.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal(): –. 10.1177/27523810241247259
    https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810241247259 [Google Scholar]
33. Goffman, Erving
    1956 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hammond, Matt
    1995 “A New Wind of Quality for Europe: Implications of the Court Case Cited by Holz-Mänttäri for the U.S. Translation Industry.” InTranslation and the Law, edited byMarshall Morris, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.viii.16ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.viii.16ham [Google Scholar]
35. Han, Byun-Chul
    2010 Müdigkeitsgesellschaft. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Han, Byung-Chul
    2014 Psychopolitik: Neoliberalismus und die neuen Machttechniken. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Wissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hine, Christine
    2005 Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hsieh, Elaine
    2015 “Healthcare Interpreting.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Inghilleri, Moira
    ed. 2005 Bourdieu and the Sociology of Translation and Interpreting. Special issue ofThe Translator(). 10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195 [Google Scholar]
40. Kalleberg, Arne L.
    2011 Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kelly, Ann H., and Javier Lezaun
    2017 “The Wild Indoors: Room-spaces of Scientific Inquiry.” Cultural Anthropology(): –. 10.14506/ca32.3.06
    https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.3.06 [Google Scholar]
42. Latour, Bruno
    2005 Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Lupton, Deborah
    2015 Digital Sociology. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Marres, Noortje
    2017 Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Martín de León, Celia
    2024 “Mirrors and Windows: Gestural Alignment in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Interpreting(): –. 10.1075/intp.00114.mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00114.mar [Google Scholar]
46. McDonough Dolmaya, Julie
    2024 Digital Research Methods for Translation Studies. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2024 “Institutional Data in Language Industry Studies: Questions of Access, Confidentiality, and Epistemology.” InCritical Approaches to Institutional Translation and Interpreting: Challenging Epistemologies, edited byEsther Monzó-Nebot and María Lomeña-Galiano, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003350163‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003350163-4 [Google Scholar]
48. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1945 Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Merlini, Raffaela, and Roberta Favaron
    2005 “Examining the ‘Voice of Interpreting’ in Speech Pathology.” Interpreting(): –. 10.1075/intp.7.2.07mer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.7.2.07mer [Google Scholar]
50. Meyer, Michelle N., John Basl, David Choffnes, Christo Wilson, and David M. J. Lazer
    2023 “Enhancing the Ethics of User-Sourced Online Data Collection and Sharing.” Nature Computational Science (): –. 10.1038/s43588‑023‑00490‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00490-7 [Google Scholar]
51. Mikkelson, Holly M.
    1999 “The Professionalization of Community Interpreting.” Journal of Interpretation: –.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Milgram, Stanley, Hilary Liberty, Raymond Toledo, and Joyce Blacken
    1986 “Response to Intrusion in Waiting Lines.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology(): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.51.4.683
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.683 [Google Scholar]
53. Mills, C. Wright
    1959 [2000] The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Monzó-Nebot, Esther
    2018 “Translators and Interpreters as Agents of Diversity. Managing Myths and Pursuing Justice in Postmonolingual Societies.” InTranslating Justice in a Postmonolingual Age, edited byEsther Monzó Nebot and Juan Jiménez-Salcedo, –. Wilmington: Vernon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Monzó-Nebot, Esther
    2024 “Remote Interpreting and the Politics of Diversity: The Lived Experiences of LGBTIQ+ Interpreters in International Organizations.” InGendered Technology in Translation and Interpreting: Centering Rights in the Development of Language Technologies, edited byEsther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003465508‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003465508-6 [Google Scholar]
56. Monzó-Nebot, Esther
    2025a “In Different Voices: The Roles of Public Machine Translation Studies.” InThe Social Impact of Automating Translation: An Ethics of Care Perspective on Machine Translation, edited byEsther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003465522‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003465522-10 [Google Scholar]
57. Monzó-Nebot, Esther
    2025b “The Cultural Roots of Translation Automation: Revealing Ideologies in Machine Translation.” InThe Social Impact of Automating Translation: An Ethics of Care Perspective on Machine Translation, edited byEsther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003465522‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003465522-2 [Google Scholar]
58. Monzó-Nebot, Esther
    . Forthcoming. “The Language Justice Movement.” InElgar Concise Encyclopedia of Law and Language edited by Karen McAuliffe and Javier Moreno-Rivero. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Monzó-Nebot, Esther, and Sara Elizabeth “Elle” Dowd
    2024 “Interpreters Manterrupted: The Relevance of Gender in Court Interruption Patterns.” InCritical Approaches to Institutional Translation and Interpreting: Challenging Epistemologies, edited byEsther Monzó-Nebot and María Lomeña-Galiano, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003350163‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003350163-10 [Google Scholar]
60. Monzó-Nebot, Esther, and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster
    eds. 2024 Gendered Technology in Translation and Interpreting: Centering Rights in the Development of Language Technology. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003465508
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003465508 [Google Scholar]
61. Morozov, Evgeny
    2013 To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Nicolini, Davide
    2009 “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies(): –. 10.1177/0170840609349875
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875 [Google Scholar]
63. Panai, Enrico
    2023 “The Latent Space of Data Ethics.” AI & Society: –. 10.1007/s00146‑023‑01757‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01757-3 [Google Scholar]
64. Pasquale, Frank
    2015 The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061 [Google Scholar]
65. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2024 “Is Machine Interpreting Interpreting?” Translation Spaces. Online First. 10.1075/ts.23028.poc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.23028.poc [Google Scholar]
66. Rakow, Lana F.
    1988 “Gendered Technology, Gendered Practice.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication(): –. 10.1080/15295038809366685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038809366685 [Google Scholar]
67. Reckwitz, Andreas
    2002 “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory(): –. 10.1177/13684310222225432
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432 [Google Scholar]
68. Rosenblat, Alex, and Luke Stark
    2016 “Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers.” International Journal of Communication: –.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Edited byGail Jefferson: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sartre, Jean-Paul
    1943 L’être et le néant. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Schatzki, Theodore R.
    1996 Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470 [Google Scholar]
72. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson
    2012 The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446250655
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655 [Google Scholar]
73. Smith, Adam
    1776 (1998) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Spiel, Katta, and Robin Angelini
    2022 “Expressive Bodies Engaging with Embodied Disability Cultures for Collaborative Design Critiques.” InProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’22). New York: ACM. 10.1145/3517428.3551350
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3551350 [Google Scholar]
75. Srnicek, Nick
    2017 Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Standing, Guy
    2011 The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Susskind, Richard, and Daniel Susskind
    2022 The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Varoufakis, Yanis
    2020 Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present. London: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Varoufakis, Yanis
    2023 Technofeudalism. What Killed Capitalism. New York: Penguin Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Wajcman, Judy
    2004 Technofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Wallerstein, Immanuel
    1974 The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Wang, Lena
    2020 “The Three Harms of Gendered Technology.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2799
    https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2799 [Google Scholar]
84. Weil, Simone
    1934a Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Weil, Simone
    1934b (1955) Oppression et liberté. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Wingrove, Patrick, Jennifer Rigby, and Emma Farge
    2025 “Trump orders US exit from World Health Organization.” Reuters, 21 January 2025. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-signs-executive-withdrawing-world-health-organization-2025-01-21/
    [Google Scholar]
87. World Health Organization (WHO)
    World Health Organization (WHO) 2023 “EPI-WIN Webinar: A Fragile State of Preparedness: 2023 Global Preparedness Monitoring Board report.” 15 November 2023, 13:00–14:00, Online public session. Geneva, CH.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Zerubavel, Eviatar
    1997 Social Mindscapes. An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Zhao, Yizhang, and Mingyu Wang
    2023 “Digital Sociology: Origin, Development, and Prospects from a Global Perspective.” Journal of Chinese Sociology(): article 19. 10.1186/s40711‑023‑00198‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00198-1 [Google Scholar]
90. Zuboff, Shoshana
    2019 The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
    [Google Scholar]