Does it ‘feel’ non-native?

References

1. Baker, M.
   Baker, M. (1992) In other words. A coursebook on translation. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203327579
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327579 [Google Scholar]
2. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finnegan, E.
   (1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bohnacker, U. & Rosén, C.
   (2007) Transferring information-structural patterns from Swedish to German. In A. Belikova , L. Meroni , & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America (GALANA) (pp.27–38). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Callies, M.
   (2009) Information highlighting in advanced learner English: The syntax-pragmatics interface in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.186
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.186 [Google Scholar]
5. Dreschler, G. , & Hebing, R.
   (2011) Sentence beginnings in Present-day English, Present-day Dutch and Old English. In C. Cummins , C. -H. Elder , & T. Godard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, (pp.58–69). Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Granger, S.
   (1996) From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In K. Aijmer , B. Altenberg , & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in contrast. Text-based cross-linguistic studies (Lund studies in English 88) (pp.37–51). Lund: Lund University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Halliday, M. A. K.
   (1985) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hannay, M. , & Keizer, M. E.
   (1993) Translation and contrastive grammar: The grammatical vs the communicative strategy. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 45, 65–88. doi: 10.1075/ttwia.45.09han
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ttwia.45.09han [Google Scholar]
9. Hultfors, P.
   (1986) Reactions to non-native English: Native English speakers’ assessments of errors in the use of English made by non-native users of the language. Part 1: Acceptability and intelligibility. Stockholm studies in English 67. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Koster, J.
    (1975) Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic analysis, 1, 111–136.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Krifka, M. , & Musan, R.
    (2012) Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In M. Krifka , & R. Musan (Eds.), The expression of information structure, (pp.1–44). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110261608.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608.1 [Google Scholar]
12. Los, B.
    (2009) The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English language and linguistics, 13(1), 97–125. doi: 10.1017/S1360674308002876
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002876 [Google Scholar]
13. Los, B. , & Dreschler, G.
    (2012) The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to permissive subjects. In T. Nevalainen , & E. Closs Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. (pp.859–871). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Meunier, F.
    (2015) Introduction to the LONGDALE project. In E. Castello , K. Ackerley , & F. Coccetta (Eds.), Studies in learner corpus linguistics: Research and applications for foreign language teaching and assessment. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Quirk, R. , & Svartvik, J.
    (1966) Investigating linguistic acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rosén, C.
    (2006) “Warum klingt das nicht deutsch?” – Probleme der Informationsstrukturierung in deutschen Texten schwedischer Schüler und Studenten. Lunder germanistische Forschungen, 67. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Van Vuuren, S.
    Van Vuuren, S. (2013) Information structural transfer in Dutch EFL writing: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 173–197. doi: 10.1075/avt.30.13van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.30.13van [Google Scholar]
18. Van Vuuren, S. , & De Vries, R.
    (2017). Common framework, local context, local anchors: How V2 to SVO information-structural transfer can help to distinguish within CEFR C2. In B. Los & P. De Haan Eds. Word order change in acquisition and language contact. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.243.16vuu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.16vuu [Google Scholar]
19. Van Vuuren, S. , & Laskin, L.
    (2017) Dutch learner English in close-up: A Bayesian corpus analysis of pre-subject adverbials in advanced Dutch EFL writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(1): 1–35. doi: 10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.01van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.01van [Google Scholar]
20. Van Vuuren, S. , & Berns, J.
    (2017) Same difference? L1 influence in the use of initial adverbials in English novice writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. In press. doi: 10.1515/iral‑2016‑0077
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0077 [Google Scholar]
21. Verheijen, L. , Los, B. , & De Haan, P.
    (2013) Information structure: the final hurdle? The development of syntactic structures in (very) advanced Dutch EFL writing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 92–107. doi: 10.1075/dujal.2.1.09ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.2.1.09ver [Google Scholar]