1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Many studies in recent years identify and discuss Dutch ethnolects. Generally this work takes linguistic phenomena as directly reflective of speakers’ ethnic identity. But if ethnicity is an inherent speaker feature, the absence of white ethnolect descriptions is difficult to explain. In this paper, therefore, I wish to judge the appeal of the notion of ethnolect against its usefulness for explaining language use. I argue that ethnolect can usefully label everyday ethnicisations of language, but that such evaluations generally compress a more complex reality in which so-called ethnolectal features are recruited for other purposes than (un)marking one’s ascribed ethnicity. Crucial to unpacking this reality is the distinction of an intermediary step, the construction of interactional stance, between the use of linguistic features and their association with common-sense identity categories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17002.jas
2017-12-30
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, A.
    (2004) Registers of language. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.23–45). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brubaker, R.
    (2002) Ethnicity without groups. European Journal of Sociology, 43, 163–189. doi: 10.1017/S0003975602001066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001066 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brubaker, R. , & Cooper, F.
    (2000) Beyond “identity”. Theory and Society, 29, 1–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1007068714468
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucholtz, M. , & Hall, K.
    (2004) Language and identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.369–394). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, D. , & Kulick, D.
    (2003) Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clyne, M.
    (2000) Lingua Franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica, 14, 83–89. doi: 10.1515/9783110245196.83
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245196.83 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cornips, L. , & De Rooij, V. (2013) Selfing and othering through categories of race, place, and language among minority youths in Rotterdamn, the Netherlands. In P. Siemund , I. Gogolin , M. E. Schulz , & J. Davydova (Eds.), Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas (pp.129–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hsld.1.07cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.1.07cor [Google Scholar]
  8. Coupland, N.
    (2010) Language, ideology, media and social change. In K. Junod , & D. Maillat (Eds.), Performing the self (pp.127–151). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckert, P.
    (2008a) Where do ethnolects stop?International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(1–2), 25–41. doi: 10.1177/13670069080120010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069080120010301 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2008b) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Gadet, F. , & Hambye, P.
    (2014) Contact and ethnicity in ‘youth language’ description: In search of specificity. In R. Nicolaï (Ed.), Questioning language contact. Limits of contact, contact at its limits (pp.183–216). Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004279056_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279056_008 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haugen, E.
    (1972) The ecology of language. Essays by Einar Haugen. (Selected and introduced by A. S. Dil ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hinskens, F.
    (2011) Emerging Moroccan and Turkish varieties of Dutch: Ethnolects or ethnic styles?In F. Kern , & M. Selting (Eds.), Ethnic styles of speaking in European metropolitan areas (pp.101–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/silv.8.05hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.8.05hin [Google Scholar]
  14. (2016) Wijdvertakte wortels. Over etnolectisch Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press – Meertens Instituut (KNAW).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaffe, A.
    (2009) Stance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaspers, J.
    (2005) Linguistic sabotage in a context of monolingualism and standardization. Language and Communication, 25(3), 279–297. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2008) Problematizing ethnolects. Naming linguistic practices in an Antwerp secondary school. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(1–2), 85–103. doi: 10.1177/13670069080120010601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069080120010601 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2011) Strange bedfellows. Appropriations of a tainted urban dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 493–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00502.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00502.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Muysken, P.
    (2013) Ethnolects of Dutch. In F. Hinskens & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Language and Space: Dutch (pp.739–761). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nortier, J.
    (2008) Introduction. Ethnolects? The emergence of new varieties among adolescents. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(1–2), 1–5. doi: 10.1177/13670069080120010101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069080120010101 [Google Scholar]
  21. Nortier, J. , & Dorleijn, M.
    (2008) A Moroccan accent in Dutch: A socio-cultural style restricted to the Moroccan community?International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(1–2), 125–142. doi: 10.1177/13670069080120010801
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069080120010801 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ochs, E.
    (1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti , & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp.335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.407–437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ortner, P.
    (1998) The hidden life of class. Journal of Anthropological Research, 54(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1086/jar.54.1.3631674
    https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.54.1.3631674 [Google Scholar]
  25. Phillips, A.
    (2010) What’s wrong with essentialism?Distinktion. Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 11(1), 47–60. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2010.9672755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2010.9672755 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rampton, B.
    (2006) Language in late modernity. Interaction at an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruette, T. , & Van de Velde, F.
    (2013) Moroccorp: tien miljoen woorden uit twee Marokkaans-Nederlandse chatkanalen. Lexicos, 23, 456–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Snell, J. (2010) From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(5), 630–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00457.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00457.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Aelst, T.
    (writer & director) (2013) Wat als iedereen sprak als een Marokkaan?InShelter (producer), Wat als?Vilvoorde: Vlaamse TelevisieMaatschappij (VTM).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Van der Sijs, N.
    (2014) Systematisch onderzoek naar Nederlandse contactvariëteiten. Taal & Tongval, 66(2), 117–142. doi: 10.5117/TET2014.2.SIJS
    https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2014.2.SIJS [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Meel, L. , Hinskens, F. , & Van Hout, R.
    (2013) Ethnolectal variation in the realization of /z/ by Dutch youngsters. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 80(3), 297–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2014) Variation in the realization of /ɛi/ by Dutch youngsters: From local urban dialect to emerging ethnolects?Dialectologia et Geolinguistica, 22(1), 46–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2016) Co-variation and varieties in modern Dutch ethnolects. Lingua, 172–173, 72–86.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17002.jas
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17002.jas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Antwerp dialect , ethnicisation , ethnicity , ethnolect , Moroccan Dutch and stance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error