1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Students who are proficient academic language (AL) users, achieve better in school. To develop students’ AL register teachers’ AL input is necessary. The goal of this study was to investigate the extent of AL features in the language input first and second grade teachers give their students in whole class mathematics instruction. Five key features could be distinguished: lexical diversity, lexical complexity, lexical specificity, syntactic complexity and textual complexity. Teachers used all features, but the amount in which they used them varied. While all teachers used lexical specific language when teaching mathematics, they did not use very complex language input. The academicness of teachers’ input was significantly higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 with respect to lexical diversity and lexical specificity. The input during explanation and discussion only differed with regard to textual complexity, which was higher during explanation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17007.dok
2017-12-30
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarts, R. , Demir-Vegter, S. , Kurvers, J. , & Henrichs, L.
    (2016) Academic language in shared book reading: Parent and teacher input to mono- and bilingual pre-schoolers. Language learning, 66(2), 263–295. doi: 10.1111/lang.12152
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12152 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarts, R. , Demir, S. , & Vallen, T.
    (2011) Characteristics of academic language register occurring in caretaker-child interaction: Development and validation of a coding scheme. Language Learning, 61(4), 173–1221. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00664.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00664.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Aukrust, V.
    (2007) Young children acquiring second language vocabulary in preschool group-time: Does amount, diversity, and discourse complexity of teacher talk matter?Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(1), 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02568540709594610
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540709594610 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blank, M. , Rose, S. , & Berlin, L.
    (1978) The language of learning: The preschool years. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Buijs, K.
    (2008) TULE – rekenen/wiskunde: Inhouden en activiteiten bij de kerndoelen van 2006. Enschede: SLO.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, E.
    (2003) First language acquisition. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cummins, J.
    (2000) Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Demir-Vegter, S. , Aarts, R. , & Kurvers, J. (2014) Lexical richness in maternal input and vocabulary development of Turkish preschoolers in the Netherlands. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 43(2), 149–165. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑013‑9245‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9245-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dokter, N. , Aarts, A. , Kurvers, J. , Ros, A. , & Kroon, S.
    (2017) Stimulating students’ academic language. Opportunities in instructional methods in elementary school mathematics. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 17, 1–21. doi: 10.17239/L1ESLL‑2017.17.01.01
    https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2017.17.01.01 [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, M.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar (Vol2.). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Henrichs, L.
    (2010) Academic language in early childhood interactions. A longitudinal study of 3- to 6-year-old Dutch monolingual children. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Center For Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoff, E. & Naigles, L.
    (2002) How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 73(2), 18–433. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8624.00415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00415 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huttenlocher, J. , Vasilyeva, M. , Cymerman, E. , & Levine, S.
    (2002) Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337–374. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0285(02)00500‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kieffer, M. , & Lesaux, N.
    (2007) Breaking down words to build meaning: Morphology, vocabulary, and reading comprehension in the urban classroom. The Reading Teacher, 61(2). 134–144. doi: 10.1598/RT.61.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.2.3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kleemans, T.
    (2013) Individual variation in early numerical development: Impact of linguistic diversity and home environment. Nijmegen; Behavioural Science Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lagzhaoui, M.
    (2011) Emergent academic language at home and at school: A longitudinal study of 3-to 6-year-old Moroccan Berber children in the Netherlands. Oisterwijk: BOXPress.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Leseman, P. , Mayo, A. , Messer, M. , Scheele, A. , & Vander Heyden, K.
    (2009) De vroege ontwikkeling van schooltaal: Het DASH-project. Tijdschrift voor orthopedagogiek, (48)6, 271–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mercer, N. , & Sams, C.
    (2006) Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528. doi: 10.2167/le678.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/le678.0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Moore, J. , & Schleppegrell, M.
    (2014) Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English language arts. Linguistics and Education, 26, 92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. MacWhinney, B.
    (1995) The CHILDES project. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nagy, W. , & Townsend, D.
    (2012) Words as tools, learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.011
    https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nap-Kolhoff, E. , & Van Steensel, R.
    (2005) Second language acquisition in preschool playgroups and its relation to later school success. European Educational Research Journal, 4, 243–255. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.8
    https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.8 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nystrand, M. , Wu, L. , Gamoran, A. , Zeiser, S. , & Long, D.
    (2003) Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Scarcella, R.
    (2003) Academic English: A conceptual framework. The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute, Technical Report 2003-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Scheele, A. , Leseman, P. , Mayo, A. , & Elbers, E.
    (2012) The relation of home language and literacty to three-year_old children’s academic language in narrative and instruction genres. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 419–444. doi: 10.1086/663300
    https://doi.org/10.1086/663300 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schleppegrell, M.
    (2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2013) The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(1), 153–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00742.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Sfard, A. (2012) Introduction: Developing mathematical discourse – Some insights from communicational research. Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smit, J.
    (2013) Scaffolding language in multilingual mathematics classrooms. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Snow, C. , Cancini, H. , Gonzalez, P. , & Shriberg, E.
    (1989) Giving formal definitions: An oral language correlate of school literacy. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp.233–49). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tellings, A. , Hulsbosch, M. , Vermeer, A. , & Van den Bosch, A.
    (2014) BasiLex: An 11.5-million-words corpus of Dutch texts written for children. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, 4, 191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tomasello, M.
    (2000) Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Cognition, 74, 209–253. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00069‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Uccelli, P. , Barr, C. , Dobbs, C. , Phillips Galloway, E. , Meneses, A. , & Sánchez, E.
    (2015) Core academic language skills: An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in preadolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1077–1109. doi: 10.1017/S014271641400006X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641400006X [Google Scholar]
  34. Wong-Fillmore, L. , & Snow, C.
    (2005) What teachers need to know about language. In C. Adger , C. Snow , & D. Christian , (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp.7–54). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zwiers, J.
    (2008) Building academic language: essential practices for content classrooms. Grades 5-12. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Teacher.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17007.dok
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17007.dok
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): academic language , elementary school , input , mathematics instruction and teacher
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error