1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In a large corpus (2.9 million tokens) of chat conversations, we studied the impact of Flemish adolescents’ social background on non-standard writing. We found significant correlations between different aspects of social class (level of education, home language and profession of the parents) and all examined deviations from formal written standard Dutch. Clustering several social variables might not only lead to a better operationalization of the complex phenomenon of social class, it certainly allows for discriminating social groups with distinct linguistic practices: lower class teenagers used each of the non-standard features much more often and in some cases in a different way than their upper class peers. Possible explanations concern discrepancies in terms of both linguistic proficiency and linguistic attitudes. Our findings emphasize the importance of including social background as an independent variable in variationist studies on youngsters’ computer-mediated communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil
2018-08-10
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, J.
    (2013) Language change: Progress or decay?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, J.
    (2011) Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp.145–161). Oslo: Novus.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Braham, P.
    (2013) Key concepts in sociology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coates, J.
    (1993) Quantitative studies. In J. Coates , Women, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (pp.61–86). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crompton, R.
    (2010) The rise, fall and rise of social class. In A. Giddens & P. W. Sutton , Sociology: Introductory readings (3rd ed., pp.154–160). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Decker, B. , & Vandekerckhove, R.
    (2012) De mythe van dialectrevival. In S. Kindt , P. Dendale , & A. Vanderheyden (Eds.), La langue mise en contexte: Essais en l’honneur d’Alex Vanneste (pp.27–46). Maastricht: Shaker.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2017) Global features of online communication in local Flemish: Social and medium-related determinants. Folia Linguistica, 51(1), 253–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Jager, H. , Mok, A. L. , & Sipkema, G.
    (2009) Grondbeginselen der sociologie. Groningen: Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckert, P.
    (2000) Linguistic variation as social practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Erikson, R. , Goldthorpe, J. H. , & Portocarero, L.
    (1979) Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. The British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415–441.10.2307/589632
    https://doi.org/10.2307/589632 [Google Scholar]
  11. Erikson, R. , & Goldthorpe, J. H.
    (1992) The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. [FMET] Flemish Ministry of Education and Training/Vlaams ministerie van onderwijs en vorming
    [FMET] Flemish Ministry of Education and Training/Vlaams ministerie van onderwijs en vorming (2017) Structuur en organisatie van het onderwijssysteem. In Flemish Ministry of Education and Training, Statistisch jaarboek van het Vlaams onderwijs. Schooljaar 2015–2016 (pp.8–18).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldthorpe, J. H. , & Breen, R.
    (2007) Explaining educational differentials. Towards a formal rational action theory. In J. H. Goldthorpe , On Sociology, Vol. Two: Illustration and retrospect (2nd ed., pp.45–72). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hilte, L. , Vandekerckhove, R. , & Daelemans, W.
    (2016) Expressiveness in Flemish online teenage talk: A corpus-based analysis of social and medium-related linguistic variation. In D. Fišer & M. Beißwenger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th conference on CMC and social media corpora for the humanities, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 27–28 September 2016 (pp.30–33), Ljubljana: Znanstvena zalozba Filozofske fakultete.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmes, J.
    (1992) An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kucukyilmaz, T. , Cambazogly, B. B. , Aykanat, C. , & Can, F.
    (2006) Chat mining for gender prediction. In T. Yakhno , & E. J. Neuhold (Eds.), Advances in information systems. ADVIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.274–283). Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Macionis, J. J.
    (2011) Society. The basics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsh, I.
    (Ed.) (2000) Sociology. Making sense of society. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nguyen, D. , Doğruöz, A. S. , Rosé, C. P. , & De Jong, F.
    (2016) Computational sociolinguistics: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 42(3), 537–593.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Parkins, R.
    (2012) Gender and emotional expressiveness: An analysis of prosodic features in emotional expression. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 46–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Peersman, C. , Daelemans, W. , Vandekerckhove, R. , Vandekerckhove, B. , & Van Vaerenbergh, L.
    (2016) The effects of age, gender and region on non-standard linguistic variation in online social networks. Arxiv, 26 January 2016. Retrieved from arxiv.org/abs/1601.02431 (20 September 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Trudgill, P.
    (1983a) Social identity and linguistic sex differentiation. Explanations and pseudo-explanations for differences between women’s and men’s speech. In P. Trudgill , On dialect. Social and geographical perspectives (pp.161–168). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1983b) Sex and covert prestige. Linguistic change in the urban dialect of Norwich. In P. Trudgill , On dialect. Social and geographical perspectives (pp.169–185). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vandekerckhove, R. , Cuvelier, P. , & De Decker, B.
    (2015) The integration of English in Flemish versus African online peer group language: A comparative approach. Language Matters, 46(3), 344–363.10.1080/10228195.2015.1089925
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2015.1089925 [Google Scholar]
  25. Vranken, J. , Van Hootegem, G. , Henderickx, E. , & Vanmarcke, L.
    (2017) Het speelveld, de spelregels en de spelers? Handboek sociologie. Den Haag: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wolf, A.
    (2000) Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 827–833.10.1089/10949310050191809
    https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191809 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error