Juggling ideals and constraints

References

1. Arkoudis, S.
   (2006) Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 415–433. 10.2167/beb337.0
   https://doi.org/10.2167/beb337.0 [Google Scholar]
2. Borg, S.
   (2006) Teacher cognition and teacher education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
   (2008) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:  10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
4. Chopey-Paquet, M.
   (2015) Investigating teacher partnerships for CLIL developing a model for subject-content and language teacher pedagogic collaboration towards integration (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Aberdeen. Retrieved from ​digitool​.abdn​.ac​.uk​/webclient​/StreamGate​?folder_id​=0&dvs​=1516033248693~427
5. Coyle, D.
   (2011) Post-method pedagogies: Using a second or other language as a learning tool in CLIL settings. InY. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp.49–74). Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
   (2010) Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Creese, A.
   (2000) The role of the language specialist in disciplinary teaching: In search of a subject?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(6), 451–470. 10.1080/01434630008666417
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666417 [Google Scholar]
8. Creese, A.
   (2002) The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 597–616. 10.2307/3588242
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3588242 [Google Scholar]
9. Creese, A.
   (2005) Is this content-based language teaching?Linguistics and Education, 16(2), 188–204. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.007 [Google Scholar]
10. Creswell, J. W.
    (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dale, L., Oostdam, R., & Verspoor, M.
    (2017) Searching for identity and focus: Towards an analytical framework for language teachers in bilingual education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi:  10.1080/13670050.2017.1383351
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383351 [Google Scholar]
12. Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U.
    (2013) Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545–559. 10.1017/S0261444813000256
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000256 [Google Scholar]
13. European Platform
    European Platform (2012) Standard for bilingual education in English – havo/vwo. Haarlem: Europees Platform.
    [Google Scholar]
14. European Platform
    European Platform (2013) Bilingual education in Dutch schools: A success story. Haarlem: European Platform.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fasoglio, D., & Tuin, D.
    (2018) Hoe goed spreken leerlingen Engels als zij het voortgezet onderwijs verlaten? De ERK-streefniveaus onderzocht. [How well do secondary school pupils speak English on leaving school? An investigation of CEFR attainment targets.] Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 19(1).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Freeman, D.
    (1996) Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. InK. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp.88–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HBO-raad
    HBO-raad (2011–2012) Kennisbasis docent Engels bachelor. Den Haag: HBO-raad.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A.
    (2015) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Messelink, A.
    (2018) Tweetalig onderwijs in het voortgezet onderwijs [Bilingual education in secondary schools]. Den Haag: Nuffic.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Nuffic
    Nuffic (2016) B2 or not B2 – Taalvaardigheden en ERK-niveaus in tweetalig onderwijs. Retrieved from https://www.nuffic.nl/publicaties/vind-een-publicatie/b2-or-not-b2-taalvaardigheden-en-erk-niveaus-in-tweetalig-onderwijs.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
21. Nuffic
    Nuffic (2017) Tweetalig onderwijs. Retrieved from https://www.nuffic.nl/voortgezet-onderwijs/tweetalig-onderwijs
    [Google Scholar]
22. Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2018) The knowledge base for language teaching: What is the English to be taught as content?Language Teaching Research. doi:  10.1177/1362168818777519
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818777519 [Google Scholar]
23. Swain, M.
    (1988) Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68–83. 10.18806/tesl.v6i1.542
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v6i1.542 [Google Scholar]
24. Swain, M.
    (1996) Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 529–548. 10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529 [Google Scholar]
25. Thomas, D. R.
    (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. 10.1177/1098214005283748
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748 [Google Scholar]
26. Trimbos, B.
    (2007) Concretisering van de kerndoelen MVT. Engels. Enschede: SLO.
    [Google Scholar]