1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253

Abstract

Abstract

Traditional methods for the teaching of the Spanish mood system are generally focused on the different morphosyntactic and semantic connections between the matrix and the embedded clause. This generally entails the provision of an extensive classification of subordinate clauses with the embedded verb in the subjunctive mood plus another classification with the exceptions which students need to learn/memorise in order to use them under controlled conditions. A preliminary study was carried out in which L2 learners were introduced to the subjunctive mood following a different approach (i.e. cognitive-operative). Based on the single binary opposition of declaration/non-declaration by Ruiz Campillo (2004), this approach provides a single operative value which can explain all the uses of the subjunctive without exception. The results were positive and showed that introducing Spanish mood contrast by means of this conceptual pair has the potential to improve learners’ ability to select between moods.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.19005.sol
2020-03-11
2020-08-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/dujal.19005.sol.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.19005.sol&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahern, A., & Leonetti, M.
    (2004) The Spanish subjunctive: Procedural semantics and pragmatic interference. InR. Márquez-Reiter, & M. E. Placencia (Eds.), Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish (pp.35–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.123.07ahe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.07ahe [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso Raya, R., Castañeda Castro, P., Martínez Gila, L., Miquel López, J., Ortega Olivares, J., & Ruiz Campillo, J. P.
    (2005, 2011) Gramática Básica del Estudiante de Español. Barcelona: Difusión.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cadierno, T., & Hijazo-Gascón, A.
    (2013) Cognitive linguistic approaches to second language Spanish: A focus on thinking-for-speaking. InK. Geeslin (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp.96–110). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584347.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584347.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  4. Collentine, J.
    (1995) The development of complex syntax and mood-selection abilities by intermediate-level learners of Spanish. Hispania, 78(1), 122–135. 10.2307/345232
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345232 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) The acquisition and teaching of the Spanish subjunctive: An update on current findings. Hispania, 93(1), 39–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Farley, A. P.
    (2004) Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed?InB. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.227–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Givón, T.
    (1979) On understanding grammar. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haverkate, H.
    (2002) The Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of Spanish mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.96
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.96 [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnston, M.
    (1995) Stages of the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition, 4, 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Llopis-García, R.
    (2011) Gramática Cognitiva para la Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Llopis García, R., Espinosa, J. R., & Ruiz Campillo, J. R.
    (2013) Qué gramática enseñar, qué gramática aprender. Madrid: Edinumen.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lozano, A. G.
    (1972) Subjunctives, transformations and features in Spanish. Hispania55, 76–90. 10.2307/338249
    https://doi.org/10.2307/338249 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lunn, P. V.
    (1995) The evaluative function of the Spanish subjunctive. InJ. L. Bybee, & S. Fleischman, (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse (pp.429–449). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.18lun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.18lun [Google Scholar]
  15. Mejías-Bikandi, E.
    (1994) Assertion and speaker’s intention: A pragmatically based account of mood in Spanish. Hispania77, 892–902. 10.2307/345752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345752 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1996) Space accessibility and mood in Spanish. InG. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser, (Eds.), Spaces worlds and grammar (pp.157–178). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pereira, I.
    (1996) Markedness and instructed SLA: An experiment in teaching the Spanish subjunctive. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ruiz Campillo, J. P.
    (2004) El subjuntivo es lógico: una actividad de concienciación. redELE: Revista Electrónica de Didáctica ELE, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2006) El concepto de no-declaración como valor del subjuntivo. Protocolo de instrucción operativa de la selección modal en español. InC. Pastor (Ed.), Actas del programa de formación para profesorado de ELE, Munich, 89–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2007) Gramática cognitiva y ELE. Entrevista a José Plácido Ruiz Campillo. MarcoELE. Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, 5, 2–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008) El valor central del subjuntivo: ¿informatividad o declaratividad?MarcoELE. Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera7, 1–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Stalnaker, R. C.
    (1978) Assertions. InP. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp.315–332). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Terrell, T., Baycroft, B., & Perrone, C.
    (1987) The subjunctive in Spanish interlanguage: Accuracy and comprehensibility. InB. Van Patten, T. Dvorak, & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Foreign Language learning: A research perspective (pp.23–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. VanPatten, B.
    (1997) The case for psycholinguistics. InK. Bardovi-Harlig, & B. Hartford (Eds.), Beyond methods: Components of second language teacher education (pp.1–17). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.19005.sol
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error