Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article presents an approach to fostering (oral) communication skills in L2 English using social media. It proposes that social media provide a setting for synchronous and asynchronous oral CMC and can be a motivating environment for communicative tasks in the lingua franca English as adolescent learners are used to participating online, both in written and spoken modes. This can be exploited in complex competency tasks in which learners are exposed to real-life discourse and the associated linguistic challenges. Complex competency tasks can provide a framework for web-based language learning and facilitate the development of oral communicative competencies. Among the implications for teaching discussed are sensible embedding in tasks, potential issues of student participation and motivation, and the authenticity of the environments. The article concludes that social media provide a fruitful platform for combining web-based and task-based language and media learning in (semi-)authentic contexts in complex competency tasks.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alastuey, M
    (2010) Synchronous-Voice Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects on pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 1–20. Available fromhttps://calico.org/html/article_828.pdf doi: 10.11139/cj.28.1.1‑20
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.1-20 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biebighäuser, K. , Zibelius, M. , & Schmidt, T
    (2012) Aufgaben 2.0 - Aufgabenorientierung beim Fremdsprachenlernen mit digitalen Medien. In K. Biebighäuser , M. Zibelius , & T. Schmidt (Eds.), Aufgaben 2.0 - Konzepte, Materialien und Methoden für das Fremdsprachenlehren und -lernen mit digitalen Medien (pp. 11–56). Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilbatua, L. , Saito, R. , & Bissoonauth-Bedford, A
    (2012) Using Skype technology to enhance spoken language skills: Preliminary results from a pilot study in French, Japanese and Spanish at the University of Wollongong. EDULearn12 Proceedings: 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies , 548–556. RetrievedJanuary 3, 2015, fromwww.academia.edu/2249547/ENHANCING_ORAL_LANGUAGE_SKILLS_VIA_THE_USE_OF_SKYPE_TECHNOLOGY_IN_FRENCH_JAPANESE_AND_SPANISH_AT_THE_UNIVERSITY_OF_WOLLONGONG_AUSTRALIA
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blattner, G. , & Lomicka, L
    (2012) Facebook-ing and the social generation: A new era of language learning. Alsic, 15(1), 1–36. Available fromalsic.revues.org/2413
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bower, M
    (2015) A typology of Web 2.0 learning technologies. EDUCAUSE, 1–13. Available fromwww.educause.edu/library/resources/typology-web-20-learning-technologies
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brake, D.R
    (2012) Who do they think they’re talking to? Framings of the audience by social media users. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1056–1076.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunvand, S. , & Byrd, S
    (2011) Using VoiceThread to promote learning engagement and success for all students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(4), 28–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheung, C.M.K. , Chiu, P.-Y. , & Lee, M.K.O
    (2011) Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, 1337–1343. Available fromwiki.stoa.usp.br/images/e/e6/Whyfacebook.pdf doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chun, D
    (2011) Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 392–419. Available fromhttps://calico.org/html/article_866.pdf doi: 10.11139/cj.28.2.392‑419
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.392-419 [Google Scholar]
  10. Conole, G. , & Alevizou, P
    (2010) A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Available fromcore.ac.uk/download/pdf/5162.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cousteau, F
    (2014) Fabien Cousteau’s Mission 31. RetrievedFebruary 10, 2015, frommission-31.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Darhower, M
    (2002) Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 249–277. Available fromrepository.lib.ncsu.edu/publications/bitstream/1840.2/110/1/darhower_2002_calico.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eaton, S.E
    (2010) Using Skype in the second and foreign language classroom. Social Media Workshop “Get Your ACT(FL) Together Online: Standards Based Language Instruction via Social Media”. Paper presented at the meeting of theLanguage Acquisition Resource Center (LARC), San Diego.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Educause
    (2007) 7 Things you should know about... Skype. RetrievedFebruary 8, 2015, fromhttps://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7032.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Elam, J. , & Nesbit, B
    (2012) The efectiveness of project-based learning utilizing Web 2.0 tools in EFL. The Jaltcalljournal, 8(2), 113–127. Available fromjournal.jaltcall.org/articles/8_2_Elam.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elia, A
    (2006) Language learning in tandem via Skype. 5th Anniversary Special Issue - CALL Technologies and the Digital Learner, 6(3), 269–280. RetrievedFebruary 2, 2015, fromwww.readingmatrix.com/articles/elia/article.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabriel, S
    (2012) Präsentationen erstellen mit VoiceThread. In J. Wagner & V. Heckmann (Eds.), Web 2.0 im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Ein Praxisbuch für Lehrende in Schule und Hochschule (pp. 78–86). Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Godwin-Jones, R
    (2005) Emerging technologies - Skype and Podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 9–12. Available fromllt.msu.edu/vol9num3/emerging/
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hallet, W
    (2012) Die komplexe Kompetenzaufgabe. Fremdsprachige Diskursfähigkeit als kulturelle Teilhabe und Unterrichtspraxis. In W. Hallet (Ed.), Kompetenzaufgaben im Englischunterricht. Grundlagen und Unterrichtsbeispiele (pp. 8–19). Seelze: Kallmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hampel, R. , & Hauck, M
    (2006) Computer-mediated language learning: Making meaning in multimodal virtual learning spaces. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(2), 3–18. Available fromjournal.jaltcall.org/articles/2_2_Hampel.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hashemi, M. , & Azizinezhad, M
    (2011) The capabilities of Oovoo and Skype for language education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 50–53. Available fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811024499 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Helmke, A. , Helmke, T. , Kleinbub, I. , Nordheider, I. , Schrader, F.-W. , & Wagner, W
    (2007) Die DESI-Videostudie. Unterrichtstranskripte für die Lehrerausbildung nutzen. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht, 90, 37–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jahns, S. , & Schröter, A
    (2012) Förderung der Aussprachekompetenz in DaF und EFL in Web 2.0-Lernumgebungen. In K. Biebighäuser , M. Zibelius , & T. Schmidt (Eds.), Aufgaben 2.0 - Konzepte, Materialien und Methoden für das Fremdsprachenlehren und -lernen mit digitalen Medien (pp. 167–189). Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Juhary, J
    (2012) Online comments for language learning: A pilot study. Procedia Technology, 1, 297–302. Available fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212017312000643. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.063
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.063 [Google Scholar]
  25. Klambauer, N
    (2012) Sprechende Bilder. In J. Wagner & V. Heckmann (Eds.), Web 2.0 im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Ein Praxisbuch für Lehrende in Schule und Hochschule (pp. 119–127). Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, L
    (2014) Digital news stories: Building language learners’ content knowledge and speaking skills. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 338–356. Available fromonlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi: 10.1111/flan.12084/abstract
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12084/abstract [Google Scholar]
  27. Lornsen, T
    (2010) Online assignments: Free Web 2.0 tools in German language classes. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 43(2), 194–204. Available fromonlinelibrary.wiley.com. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‑1221.2010.00080.x/abstract
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1221.2010.00080.x/abstract [Google Scholar]
  28. Mullen, T. , Appel, C. , & Shanklin, T
    (2009) Skype-based tandem language learning and web 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 101–118). New York: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978‑1‑60566‑190‑2.ch006
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch006 [Google Scholar]
  29. Officialvoki
    (2013) Official Voki tutorial: How to create and publish your Voki. RetrievedFebruary 14, 2015, fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FunBew6S4Bk
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pop, A
    (2010) The impact of the new technologies in foreign language instruction our experience. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1185–1189. Available fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042810002090 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.169
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.169 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pop, A. , Tomuletiu, E. , & David, D
    (2011) EFL speaking communication with asynchronous voice tools for adult students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1199–1203. Available fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811004411 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.262
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.262 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pręgowski, M
    (2009) Rediscovering the netiquette: The role of propagated values and personal patterns in defining self-identity of the internet user. Observatorio (OBS*), 3(1), 353–367. Available fromobs.obercom.pt/index.php/obs/article/viewFile/241/248
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Salaberry, M
    (1996) A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 5–34. Available fromhttps://calico.org/html/article_609.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Skype
    (2014, August28). Skype in the classroom takes students on the ultimate field trip. RetrievedFebruary 8, 2015, fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzBf_J0dvyU
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2015a) Skype in the classroom. RetrievedJanuary 10, 2015, fromhttps://education.skype.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2015b) #MysterySkype. RetrievedJanuary 12, 2015, fromhttps://education.skype.com/mysteryskype
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Taillefer, L. , & Munoz-Luna, R
    (2014) Developing oral skills through Skype: A language project analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 260–264. Available fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814034697 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.045
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.045 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsukamoto, M. , Nuspliger, B. , & Senzaki, Y
    (2009) Using Skype© to connect a classroom to the world: Providing students an authentic language experience within the classroom. CamTESOL Conference on English Language Teaching: Selected Papers, 5, 162–168. Available frometec.hawaii.edu/otec/classes/645/skype_2009_camtesol.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Unger, T
    (2012): Digitale Technologien und Medien im kompetenzorientierten Englischunterricht. In W. Hallet (Ed.), Kompetenzaufgaben im Englischunterricht. Grundlagen und Unterrichtsbeispiele (pp. 56–67). Seelze: Kallmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. VoiceThread
    (2015) VoiceThread - about - features. RetrievedJanuary 18, 2015, fromvoicethread.com/about/features/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Voxopop Help
    (2009) RetrievedJanuary 18, 2015, fromwww.voxopop.com/help
  42. Wiemeyer, L. , & Großkurth, E.-M
    . (forthcoming). Vorbereitung authentischer kultureller Diskurse im Web 2.0 - Förderung der (mündlichen) Sprachkompetenz in komplexen Kompetenzaufgaben. In C. Becker , G. Blell , & A. Rössler (Eds.) Web 2.0 und komplexe Kompetenzaufgaben im Fremdsprachenunterricht.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang, S. , & Chen, J
    (2014) Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 57–75. Available fromllt.msu.edu/issues/february2014/yangchen.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error