Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abe, P. , & Jordan, N.A
    (2013) Integrating social media into the classroom curriculum. About Campus, 18(1), 16–20. doi: 10.1002/abc.21107
    https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21107 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alm, A
    (2009) Blogging for self-determination with L2 learner journals. In T. Michael (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 202–212). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi: 10.4018/978‑1‑60566‑190‑2.ch011
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ardichvili, A
    (2008) Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers and enablers. Advance in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 541–554. doi: 10.1177/1523422308319536
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308319536 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blattner, G. , & Fiori, M
    (2011) Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 24–43. doi: 10.1558/cj.v29i1.24‑43
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v29i1.24-43 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bündgens-Kosten, J. , & Brombach, G
    (2013) Die Welt zu Besuch im Projektseminar? Studentisches Bloggen und die Rolle von Öffentlichkeit. Zeitschrift Schreiben. Available fromwww.zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/cgi-bin/joolma/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=97&Itemid=32
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cross, J
    (2003, May08). Informal Learning - the other 80%. Available fromwww.internettime.com/Learning/The%20Other%2080%25.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dabbagh, N. , & Kitsantas, A
    (2012) Personal learning environments, social media and self-regulated learning: A formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dougherty, K.B. , & Andercheck, B
    (2014) Using Facebook to engage learners in a large introductory course. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 95–104. doi: 10.1177/0092055X14521022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14521022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Downes, S
    (2005, October). E-learning 2.0. E-learn magazine. Available fromelearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Duncan-Howell, J
    (2010) Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑8535.2009.00953.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenmann, M
    (2012) Heterogeneity and differentiation - Individualization in the EFL-classroom. In M. Eisenmann & T. Summer (Eds.), Basic issues in EFL-teaching and learning (pp. 415–428). Heidelberg, Germany: Universitätsverlag Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischer, E. , & Reuber, A.R
    (2011) Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fourie, C. , & Peeters, W
    (2014)  Facebook friends and foreign languages - The impact of online peer-to-peer communication on academic acculturation and second language learning. Paper presented atBAAHE annual conference: Digital Trends in (Applied) Linguistics, Literature and Translation Studies, Antwerp. 28 November 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hargittai, E
    (2010) Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.2009.00317.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Holec, H
    (1981.) Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, C. , Ramanau, R. , Cross, S. , & Healing, G
    (2010) Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022 [Google Scholar]
  17. Junco, R
    (2012) The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Laru, J. , Näykki, P. , & Järvelä, S
    (2012) Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in higher education context. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lave, J. , & Wenger, E
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  20. Leidner, D.E. , & Jarvenpaa, S
    (1995) The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 265–291. Available fromwww.cs.umd.edu/~golbeck/INFM220/249596.pdf doi: 10.2307/249596
    https://doi.org/10.2307/249596 [Google Scholar]
  21. Little, J.W
    (2003) Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913–945. Available fromwww.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=11544 doi: 10.1111/1467‑9620.00273
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00273 [Google Scholar]
  22. Long, M
    (2005) Overview: A rationale for needs analysis and needs analysis research. In M. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mao, J
    (2014) Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, A
    (2006) Literacies for the digital age. In A. Martin & D. Madigan (Eds), Digital literacies for learning (pp. 3–25). London, UK: Facet.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McBride, K
    (2009) Social networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for re-creation. In L. Lomicka & G. Lords (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in FLL (pp. 35–58). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Merse, T. , & Schmidt, J
    (2014) Internet-Medien und Web 2.0. In C. Lütge (Ed.), Englisch Methodik. Handbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II (pp. 155–176). Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen Scriptor.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ong, W.J
    (1975) The writer’s audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90(1), 9–21. doi: 10.2307/461344
    https://doi.org/10.2307/461344 [Google Scholar]
  28. Parnell, R. , & Procter, L
    (2011) Flexibility and placemaking for autonomy in learning. Educational and Child Psychology, 28(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Peeters, W
    (2015) Tapping into the educational potential of Facebook: Encouraging out-of-class peer collaboration in foreign language learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 6(2), 176–190. Available fromhttps://sisaljournal.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/peeters.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rutherford, C
    (2010) Facebook as a source of informal teacher professional development. In Education, 16(1), 60–73. Available fromined.uregina.ca/index.php/ineducation/article/view/76/512
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Samarajiva, R. , & Shields, P
    (1997) Telecommunication networks as social space: Implications for research and policy and an exemplar. Media, Culture and Society, 19, 535–555. doi: 10.1177/016344397019004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016344397019004003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt, T
    (2010) Multimediale Lernumgebungen für das Fremdsprachenlernen. In W. Hallet & F.G. Königs (Eds.), Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik (pp. 280–284). Seelze-Velbert, Germany: Klett Kallmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schroeder, J. , & Greenbowe, T.J
    (2009) The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry. Journal of Online Education. Available fromeric.ed.gov/?id=EJ840532
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tess, P.A
    (2013) The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual): A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29. doi: 10.1016/j.cihb.2012.12.032
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cihb.2012.12.032 [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas, M
    (2011) Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomas, M. , Reinders, H. , & Warschauer, M
    (2013) Contemporary computer-assisted language learning. London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Van de Poel, K. , & Fourie, C
    (2013) A critical approach to the development of blended medical communication training materials. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 42, 333–351. doi: 10.5842/42‑0‑146
    https://doi.org/10.5842/42-0-146 [Google Scholar]
  38. Van de Poel, K. , Fourie, C. , & Seberechts, K
    (2013) Medics on the Move South Africa: Access to medical words. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 4(4), 338–351. Available fromhttps://sisaljournal.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/vandepoel_fourie_seberechts.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Van de Poel, K. , & Gasiorek, J
    (2012) Effects of an efficacy-focused approach to academic writing on students’ perceptions of themselves as writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 294–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  40. Van Lier, L
    (1996) Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Viebrock, B
    (2012) Zwischen Medieneuphorie und vermeintlicher‚ Demokratisierung des Lernens: Einige kritische Überlegungen zur Nutzung des Web 2.0 im Englischunterricht. In M. Reinfried & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Medien im neokommunikativen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Einsatzformen, Inhalte, Lernerkompetenzen (pp. 185–200). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Weideman, A.J
    (2013) Innovation and reciprocity in applied linguistics. Paper presented at theSAALT/SAALA/LSSA conference, 1 July, 2013, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. White, D.S. , & Le Cornu, A
    (2011) Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9), Available fromwww.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3171/3049 doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171 [Google Scholar]
  44. Würffel, N
    (2010) Medienerziehung und -didaktik. In W. Hallet & F.G. Königs (Eds.), Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik (pp.146–150). Seelze-Velber, Germany: Klett Kallmeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Xu, J. , & Van de Poel, K
    (2011) English as a lingua franca in Flanders. A study of university students’ attitudes. English Text Construction, 4(2), 257–278. doi: 10.1075/etc.4.2.05xu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.4.2.05xu [Google Scholar]
  46. Zourou, K
    (2012) On the attractiveness of social media for language learning: A look at the state of the art. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, 15(1). Available fromalsic.revues.org/2436
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error