1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the ethical aspects of secondary use of language data: data that have been created and stored for purposes such as administration, training or quality monitoring. Such recordings provide interesting natural language data that stay clear of the observer’s paradox (Labov, 1972). Additionally, they offer opportunities for the field of applied linguistics that seeks to understand everyday language use and to assist language users. However, obtaining informed consent from interactants can be extremely difficult if gatekeepers shield them from researchers for reasons of professional ethics or because of legislation. In this article, we draw on our conversation analytic research into police interviews with child witnesses to argue a) that conceptualizing pre-recorded data as archival data is more appropriate than applying the ‘human participants’ ethical model; and b) that if sufficient protective measures are taken, secondary use of data without informed consent can be ethically sound.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.5.2.06jol
2017-02-13
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antaki, C
    (Ed.) (2011) Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230316874
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316874 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassett, E.H. , & O’Riordan, K
    (2002) Ethics of internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233–249. doi: 10.1023/A:1021319125207
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021319125207 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogobub, E.B. , & Thomas, N
    (2005) Parental consent and the ethics of research with foster children. Qualitative Social Work, 4(3), 271–292. doi: 10.1177/1473325005055592
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005055592 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cocks, A.J
    (2006) The ethical maze: Finding an inclusive path towards gaining children’s agreement to research participation. Childhood, 13(2), 247–266. doi: 10.1177/0907568206062942
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568206062942 [Google Scholar]
  5. College van Procureurs-Generaal
    (2014) Aanwijzing auditief en audiovisueel registreren van verhoren van aangevers, getuigen en verdachten. Den Haag.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dekens, K. , & Van der Sleen, J
    (2013) Handleiding het kind als getuige. Amsterdam: Stapel & De Koning.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Council of the European Union
    . (28January 2016) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) [first reading], DATAPROTECT 3, 5455/16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fargas-Malet, M. , McSherry, D. , Larkin, E. , & Robinson, C
    (2010) Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–192. doi: 10.1177/1476718X09345412
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X09345412 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fogarty, K
    (2010) ‘Just say it in your own words’. The social interactional nature of investigative interviews into child sexual abuse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabb, J
    (2010) Home truths: Ethical issues in family research. Qualitative Research, 10(4), 461–478. doi: 10.1177/1468794110366807
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366807 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hammersley, M
    (2013) On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research, 4(5), 529–541.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2014) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: A reply to Taylor and Smith. Qualitative Research, 14(6), 763–766. doi: 10.1177/1468794114554148
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114554148 [Google Scholar]
  13. Heath, C. , & Luff, P
    (2013) Embodied action and organizational activity. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 281–307). Chichester: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heydon, G
    (2005) The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230502932
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502932 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hutchby, I
    (2007) The discourse of child counseling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.21 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hutchby, I. , & Wooffitt, R
    (2008) Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Iphofen, R
    (2011) Ethical decision making in social research: A practical guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Labov, W
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Librett, M. , & Perrone, D
    (2010) Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research, 10(6), 729–747. doi: 10.1177/1468794110380548
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380548 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mondada, L
    (2013) The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). Chichester (etc.): Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Munford, R. , & Sanders, J
    (2004) Recruiting diverse groups of young people to research. Qualitative Social Work, 3(4), 469–482. doi: 10.1177/1473325004048026
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325004048026 [Google Scholar]
  22. National Rapporteur on Human Trafficking and Sexual Violence against children
    (2014) On solid ground: Tackling sexual violence against children in the Netherlands. Den Haag: National Rapporteur.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rossano, F
    (2013) Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). Chichester (etc.): Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwartz, S
    (2011) ‘Going deep’ and ‘giving back’: Strategies for exceeding ethical expectations when research amongst vulnerable youth. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 47–68. doi: 10.1177/1468794110385885
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110385885 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schiffrin, D. , Tannen, D. , & Hamilton, H.E
    (2001) Introduction. In D. Schiffrin , D. Tannen , & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 1–10). Malden MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sieber, J.E. , & Tolich, M.B
    (2013) Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles etc: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781506335162
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335162 [Google Scholar]
  27. Speer, S
    (2002a) ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction?Discourse Studies, 4(4), 511–525.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2002b) Transcending the ‘natural’/’contrived’ distinction: A rejoinder to ten have, Lynch and Potter. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 543–548.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stefánsson, E. , Atladóttir, Ó.Ý. , & Guðbjörnsson, B
    (2008) Are ethics rules too strict in retrospective clinical studies?Acta Ophthalmologica, 86, 588–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1755‑3768.2008.01413.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01413.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Stommel, W
    (2009) Entering an online support group on eating disorders: A discourse analysis. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Stommel, W. , & Te Molder, H
    (2015) Counselling online and over the phone: When pre-closing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 281–300. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2015.1058605
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058605 [Google Scholar]
  32. Taylor, S. , & Smith, R
    (2013) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: Responses to Martyn Hammersley. Qualitative Research, 0(0), 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ten Have, P
    (2007) Doing conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles etc: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208895
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  34. Vainio, A
    (2012) Beyond research ethics: Anonymity as ‘ontology’, ‘analysis’ and ‘independence’. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 685–698. doi: 10.1177/1468794112459669
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112459669 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wiles, R. , Heath, S. , Crow, G. , & Charles, V
    (2005) Informed consent in social research: A literature review. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Methods Review Papers.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams, B
    (2006) Meaningful consent to participate in social research on the part of people under the age of eighteen. Research Ethics Review, 2(1), 19–24. doi: 10.1177/174701610600200105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610600200105 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1947 Nuremberg Code , Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 Vol. II. Nuremberg. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 181–182, Retrieved on, 14 April 2016, fromwww.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war-criminals_Vol-II.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1979 Belmont Rapport . The national commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research. Retrieved on, 14 July 2014, fromvideocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf.
  39. American Anthropological Association (AAA)
    (1998/2009) Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association. Retrieved on19 November 2014, fromwww.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf.
  40. American Psychological Association (APA)
    (2002/2010) Ethical principles and code of conduct. Including 2010 amendments. Retrieved on20 April 2016, fromwww.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
  41. American Sociological Association (ASA)
    (1999/2008) Code of conduct Policies and Procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Retrieved on15 July 2014, fromwww.asanet.org/images/asa/docs/pdf/CodeofEthics.pdf.
  42. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR)
    (2012) Ethical decision-making and internet research. Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (version 2.0). Retrieved on14 May 2014, fromaoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf.
  43. Nederlandse biomedische onderzoeksgemeenschap/Federatie van Medisch Wetenschappelijke Verenigingen (FMWV)
    (2003/2004) Gedragscode Gezondheidsonderzoek. Retrieved on19 November 2014, from www.giantt.nl/gedragscode%20gezondheidsonderzoek.pdf.
  44. RESPECT Code of Practice for Socio-Economic Research
    (2004) Retrieved on20 April 2016, fromwww.respectproject.org/code/respect_code.pdf.
  45. Social Research Association (SRA)
    (December 2003) Ethical guidelines. Retrieved on20 April 2017, fromthe-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ethics03.pdf.
  46. World Medical Association
    (1964/2008) Declaration of Helsinki on ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved on14 July 2014, fromwww.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/dujal.5.2.06jol
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error