Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-7245
  • E-ISSN: 2211-7253
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The words we use in everyday language reveal our thoughts, feelings, personality, and motivations. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) is a software program to analyse text by counting words in 66 psychologically meaningful categories that are catalogued in a dictionary of words. This article presents the Dutch translation of the dictionary that is part of the LIWC 2007 version. It describes and explains the LIWC instrument and it compares the Dutch and English dictionaries on a corpus of parallel texts. The Dutch and English dictionaries were shown to give similar results in both languages, except for a small number of word categories. Correlations between word counts in the two languages were high to very high, while effect sizes of the differences between word counts were low to medium. The LIWC 2007 categories can now be used to analyse Dutch language texts.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Balsters, M.
    (2013) Expression and perception of emotions. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjekić, J. , Lazarević, L. B. , Živanović, M. , & Knežević, G.
    (2014) Psychometric evaluation of the Serbian dictionary for automatic text analysis LIWCser. Psihologija, 47(1), 5–32. doi: 10.2298/PSI1401005B
    https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1401005B [Google Scholar]
  3. Boot, P.
    (2011) Predicting long-term activity in online writing communities: A quantitative analysis of amateur writing. Paper presented atthe Supporting Digital Humanities 2011. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from crdo.up.univ-aix.fr/SLDRdata/doc/show/copenhagen/SDH-2011/submissions/sdh2011_submission_1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2013) The desirability of a corpus of online book responses. Paper presented atthe Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W13/W13-1405.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2016) LIWCtools. Tools for working with LIWC dictionaries (Version 0.0.1). Retrieved 2016-09-02 from https://github.com/pboot/LIWCtools
  6. Chung, C. K. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2007) The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedeler (Ed.), Social communication (pp.343–359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coussement, K. , & Van den Poel, D.
    (2009) Improving customer attrition prediction by integrating emotions from client/company interaction emails and evaluating multiple classifiers. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6127–6134. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. , Lee, L. , Pang, B. , & Kleinberg, J.
    (2012) Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. Paper presented atthe Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. doi: 10.1145/2187836.2187931
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187931 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gonzales, A. L. , Hancock, J. T. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2010) Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3. doi: 10.1177/0093650209351468
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351468 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ireland, M. E. , Slatcher, R. B. , Eastwick, P. W. , Scissors, L. E. , Finkel, E. J. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2011) Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44. doi: 10.1177/0956797610392928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lord, S. P. , Sheng, E. , Imel, Z. E. , Baer, J. , & Atkins, D. C.
    (2015) More than reflections: Empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client. Behavior therapy, 46(3), 296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Meder, T. , Nguyen, D. , & Gravel, R.
    (2015) The apocalypse on Twitter. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, First published online: 31 January 2015. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqu073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu073 [Google Scholar]
  14. Meganck, R. , Vanheule, S. , Inslegers, R. , & Desmet, M.
    (2009) Alexithymia and interpersonal problems: A study of natural language use. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 990–995. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Nederlandse Taalunie
    Nederlandse Taalunie (2014) e-Lex 1.1.1 Available from tst-centrale.org/nl/producten/lexica/e-lex/7-25 (21 November 2015).
  16. Nguyen, D. , Gravel, R. , Trieschnigg, D. , & Meder, T.
    (2013) “How old do you think I am?”; A study of language and age in Twitter. Paper presented atthe Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved 2015-12-31 from www.dongnguyen.nl/publications/nguyen-icwsm2013.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oostdijk, N. , Reynaert, M. , Hoste, V. , & Schuurman, I.
    (2013) The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2011) The secret life of pronouns. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pennebaker, J. W. , Boyd, R. L. , Jordan, K. , & Blackburn, K.
    (2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Retrieved from www.liwc.net (27 November 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pennebaker, J. W. , Chung, C. K. , Ireland, M. E. , Gonzales, A. , & Booth, R. J.
    (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007, retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228650445_The_Development_and_Psychometric_Properties_of_LIWC2007
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pennebaker, J. W. , Francis, M. E. , & Booth, R. J.
    (2001) Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pennebaker, J. W. , & Graybeal, A.
    (2001) Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90–93. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8721.00123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00123 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramirez-Esparza, N. , Pennebaker, J. W. , García, F. A. , & Suriá, R.
    (2007) La psicología del uso de las palabras: Un programa de computadora que analiza textos en español. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 24(1), 85–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Receptiviti
    Receptiviti (2016) Enabling AI platforms with emotional intelligence. Retrieved from www.receptiviti.ai/ (7 April 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Richardson, B. H. , Taylor, P. J. , Snook, B. , Conchie, S. M. , & Bennell, C.
    (2014) Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 357. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000077
    https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000077 [Google Scholar]
  26. Scielzo, S. A. , Patel, A. , & Smith-Jentsch, K. A.
    (2011) Academic mentoring relationship communication processes and participant-reported effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 81.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tausczik, Y. R. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tiedemann, J.
    (2012) Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. Paper presented atthe Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2012).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Van der Zanden, R. , Curie, K. , Van Londen, M. , Kramer, J. , Steen, G. , & Cuijpers, P.
    (2014) Web-based depression treatment: Associations of clients’ word use with adherence and outcome. Journal of Affective Disorders, 160, 10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Middendorp, H. , & Geenen, R.
    (2008) Poor cognitive-emotional processing may impede the outcome of emotional disclosure interventions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 49–52. doi: 10.1348/135910707X251199
    https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X251199 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolf, M. , Horn, A. B. , Mehl, M. R. , Haug, S. , Pennebaker, J. W. , & Kordy, H.
    (2008) Computergestützte quantitative Textanalyse. Äquivalenz und Robustheit der deutschen Version des Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Diagnostica, 54(2), 85–98. doi: 10.1026/0012‑1924.54.2.85
    https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.2.85 [Google Scholar]
  32. Yu, B.
    (2014) Language and gender in congressional speech. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(1), 118–132. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqs073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs073 [Google Scholar]
  33. Zijlstra, H. , Van Meerveld, T. , Van Middendorp, H. , Pennebaker, J. W. , & Geenen, R.
    (2004) De Nederlandse versie van de ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC) [The Dutch version of ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC)] Gedrag & Gezondheid [Behaviour & Health], 32, 271–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zijlstra, H. , Van Middendorp, H. , Van Meerveld, T. , & Geenen, R.
    (2005) Validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [Validity of the Dutch version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie [Netherlands Journal of Psychology], 60(3), 50–58.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count; LIWC; psychology; text analysis; tools; translation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error