The Dutch translation of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 2007 dictionary

References

1. Balsters, M.
   (2013) Expression and perception of emotions. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bjekić, J. , Lazarević, L. B. , Živanović, M. , & Knežević, G.
   (2014) Psychometric evaluation of the Serbian dictionary for automatic text analysis LIWCser. Psihologija, 47(1), 5–32. doi: 10.2298/PSI1401005B
   https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1401005B [Google Scholar]
3. Boot, P.
   (2011) Predicting long-term activity in online writing communities: A quantitative analysis of amateur writing. Paper presented atthe Supporting Digital Humanities 2011. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from crdo.up.univ-aix.fr/SLDRdata/doc/show/copenhagen/SDH-2011/submissions/sdh2011_submission_1.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boot, P.
   (2013) The desirability of a corpus of online book responses. Paper presented atthe Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W13/W13-1405.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boot, P.
   (2016) LIWCtools. Tools for working with LIWC dictionaries (Version 0.0.1). Retrieved 2016-09-02 from https://github.com/pboot/LIWCtools
6. Chung, C. K. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
   (2007) The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedeler (Ed.), Social communication (pp.343–359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cohen, J.
   (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coussement, K. , & Van den Poel, D.
   (2009) Improving customer attrition prediction by integrating emotions from client/company interaction emails and evaluating multiple classifiers. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6127–6134. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.021 [Google Scholar]
9. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. , Lee, L. , Pang, B. , & Kleinberg, J.
   (2012) Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. Paper presented atthe Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. doi: 10.1145/2187836.2187931
   https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187931 [Google Scholar]
10. Gonzales, A. L. , Hancock, J. T. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2010) Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3. doi: 10.1177/0093650209351468
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351468 [Google Scholar]
11. Ireland, M. E. , Slatcher, R. B. , Eastwick, P. W. , Scissors, L. E. , Finkel, E. J. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2011) Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44. doi: 10.1177/0956797610392928
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928 [Google Scholar]
12. Lord, S. P. , Sheng, E. , Imel, Z. E. , Baer, J. , & Atkins, D. C.
    (2015) More than reflections: Empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client. Behavior therapy, 46(3), 296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002 [Google Scholar]
13. Meder, T. , Nguyen, D. , & Gravel, R.
    (2015) The apocalypse on Twitter. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, First published online: 31 January 2015. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqu073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu073 [Google Scholar]
14. Meganck, R. , Vanheule, S. , Inslegers, R. , & Desmet, M.
    (2009) Alexithymia and interpersonal problems: A study of natural language use. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 990–995. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.005 [Google Scholar]
15. Nederlandse Taalunie
    Nederlandse Taalunie (2014) e-Lex 1.1.1 Available from tst-centrale.org/nl/producten/lexica/e-lex/7-25 (21 November 2015).
16. Nguyen, D. , Gravel, R. , Trieschnigg, D. , & Meder, T.
    (2013) “How old do you think I am?”; A study of language and age in Twitter. Paper presented atthe Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved 2015-12-31 from www.dongnguyen.nl/publications/nguyen-icwsm2013.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
17. Oostdijk, N. , Reynaert, M. , Hoste, V. , & Schuurman, I.
    (2013) The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2011) The secret life of pronouns. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pennebaker, J. W. , Boyd, R. L. , Jordan, K. , & Blackburn, K.
    (2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Retrieved from www.liwc.net (27 November 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pennebaker, J. W. , Chung, C. K. , Ireland, M. E. , Gonzales, A. , & Booth, R. J.
    (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007, retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228650445_The_Development_and_Psychometric_Properties_of_LIWC2007
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pennebaker, J. W. , Francis, M. E. , & Booth, R. J.
    (2001) Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pennebaker, J. W. , & Graybeal, A.
    (2001) Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90–93. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8721.00123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00123 [Google Scholar]
23. Ramirez-Esparza, N. , Pennebaker, J. W. , García, F. A. , & Suriá, R.
    (2007) La psicología del uso de las palabras: Un programa de computadora que analiza textos en español. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 24(1), 85–99.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Receptiviti
    Receptiviti (2016) Enabling AI platforms with emotional intelligence. Retrieved from www.receptiviti.ai/ (7 April 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Richardson, B. H. , Taylor, P. J. , Snook, B. , Conchie, S. M. , & Bennell, C.
    (2014) Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 357. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000077
    https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000077 [Google Scholar]
26. Scielzo, S. A. , Patel, A. , & Smith-Jentsch, K. A.
    (2011) Academic mentoring relationship communication processes and participant-reported effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 81.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Tausczik, Y. R. , & Pennebaker, J. W.
    (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676 [Google Scholar]
28. Tiedemann, J.
    (2012) Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. Paper presented atthe Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2012).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Van der Zanden, R. , Curie, K. , Van Londen, M. , Kramer, J. , Steen, G. , & Cuijpers, P.
    (2014) Web-based depression treatment: Associations of clients’ word use with adherence and outcome. Journal of Affective Disorders, 160, 10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.005 [Google Scholar]
30. Van Middendorp, H. , & Geenen, R.
    (2008) Poor cognitive-emotional processing may impede the outcome of emotional disclosure interventions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 49–52. doi: 10.1348/135910707X251199
    https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X251199 [Google Scholar]
31. Wolf, M. , Horn, A. B. , Mehl, M. R. , Haug, S. , Pennebaker, J. W. , & Kordy, H.
    (2008) Computergestützte quantitative Textanalyse. Äquivalenz und Robustheit der deutschen Version des Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Diagnostica, 54(2), 85–98. doi: 10.1026/0012‑1924.54.2.85
    https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.2.85 [Google Scholar]
32. Yu, B.
    (2014) Language and gender in congressional speech. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(1), 118–132. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqs073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs073 [Google Scholar]
33. Zijlstra, H. , Van Meerveld, T. , Van Middendorp, H. , Pennebaker, J. W. , & Geenen, R.
    (2004) De Nederlandse versie van de ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC) [The Dutch version of ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC)] Gedrag & Gezondheid [Behaviour & Health], 32, 271–281.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Zijlstra, H. , Van Middendorp, H. , Van Meerveld, T. , & Geenen, R.
    (2005) Validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [Validity of the Dutch version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie [Netherlands Journal of Psychology], 60(3), 50–58.
    [Google Scholar]