Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The question of monogenesis vs. polygenesis of human languages was essentially neglected by contemporary linguistics until the appearance of the research on the genetics of human populations by L. L. Cavalli-Sforza and his collaborators, which brought to light very exciting parallels between the distribution of human populations and that of language families. The present paper highlights some aspects of the history of the problem and some points of the contemporary discussion. We first outline the “Biblical paradigm”, which persisted until the 18th century even in scientific milieus. Then, we outline some aspects of the 19th century debate about monogenesis vs. polygenesis of languages and about the relationships between languages and human populations: in particular, we will discuss the views of Darwin on the one hand and of some linguists on the other (Schleicher, M. Müller, Whitney and Trombetti). It will be seen that their positions only partly coincide; at any rate, it will be shown that Darwin was partly inspired by the problems of the genealogy of languages and that the linguists, for their part, took account of Darwin’s views. Turning to today’s debate, we first present the positions of the linguists arguing for monogenesis, namely J. Greenberg and M. Ruhlen, as well as the criticisms raised against their methods by the majority of linguists. Other scholars, such as D. Bickerton or N. Chomsky, essentially argue, from different points of view, that the problem of monogenesis vs. polygenesis of languages is a “pseudo-problem”. We however think that, although the question cannot be reasonably solved by linguistic means, it cannot be discarded as meaningless: it is an anthropological rather than a linguistic problem. We present some reflections and suggestions, in the light of which the monogenetic hypothesis appears as more tenable than the polygenetic one.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baker, M.
    (2003) Linguistic differences and language design. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7.8, 349–353. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00157‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00157-8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beauzée, N.
    (1765) Langue. In: Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, TomeIX. Neufchastel: Faulche, 249–266 [English translation byJ. Wallhager. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library 2015 hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0003.190 (accessedOctober 19, 2018)].
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berwick, R. C., Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N., Bolhuis, J.
    (2013) Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17.2, 89–98. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bickerton, D.
    (2007) Language Evolution: A Brief Guide for Linguists. Lingua, 117, 510–526. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill & Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L.
    (2000) Genes, Peoples, and Languages. New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Piazza, A., Menozzi, P., Mountain, J.
    (1988) Reconstruction of human evolution: Bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. PNAS, 85, 6002–6006. 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6002
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.16.6002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, N.
    (2000) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.. 10.1017/CBO9780511811937
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2010) Some simple evo-devo theses: how true might they be for language?In: Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., Yamakido, H. (eds.): The Evolution of Human Language. Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 45–72. 10.1017/CBO9780511817755.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817755.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Condillac, E. B. de
    (1746) Essai sur l’origine des connoissances humaines [quoted from the edition byR. Lenoir. Paris: Armand Colin 1924 ; English translation byH. Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. 2001].
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1775) Cours d’études pour l’instruction du Prince de Parme. Tome premier: Grammaire. Parme: Imprimerie Royale.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Darwin, C.
    (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, N., Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  15. Formigari, L.
    (2013) L’origine del linguaggio: Ricognizioni storiche e valenze epistemologiche. In: Banfi, E. (ed.): Sull’origine del linguaggio e delle lingue storico-naturali. Un confronto tra linguisti e non linguisti. Roma: Bulzoni, 13–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Graffi, G.
    (1995) Old Debates and Current Problems: Völkerpsychologie and the question of the individual and the social in language. In: Formigari, L., Gambarara, D. (eds.): Historical Roots of Linguistic Theories. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 171–184. 10.1075/sihols.74.11gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.74.11gra [Google Scholar]
  17. Hockett, C. F.
    (1960) The Origin of Speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–96. 10.1038/scientificamerican0960‑88
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hockett, C. F., Asher, R.
    (1964) The Human Revolution. Current Anthropology, 5, 135–168. 10.1086/200477
    https://doi.org/10.1086/200477 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jespersen, O.
    (1922) Language. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Morpurgo Davies, A.
    (2014) Nineteenth-Century Linguistics (= History of Linguistics, ed. byG. Lepschy, vol.IV). London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mounin, G.
    (1974)  Histoire de la linguistique des origines au XXe siècle. Paris : P.U.F.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mufwene, S. S.
    (2013) The Origins and the Evolution of Language. In: K. Allan (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 13–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Müller, M.
    (1873a) Lectures on Mr. Darwin’s Philosophy of Language. Fraser’s Magazine7, 525–41, 659–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1873b) Lectures on Mr. Darwin’s Philosophy of Language. Fraser’s Magazine8, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1885) Lectures on the Science of Language, vols.1 and 2 (New edition). London: Longmans, Green & co.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nichols, J.
    (2012) Monogenesis or Polygenesis: A Single Ancestral Language for All Humanity?In: Tallerman, M., Gibson, K. G. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 558–572.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Paul, H.
    (1910) Über Völkerpsychologie. Süddeutsche Monatshefte, Heft10, 363–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1920) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 5th ed.Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rousseau, J. J.
    (1755)  Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. [quoted from the edition byJ. Starobinski. Paris : Gallimard 1969  English translation byD. A. Cress, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett].
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruhlen, M.
    (1994) On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford U.P.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Saussure, F. de
    (1922) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot (English transl. byW. Baskin. New-York: McGraw-Hill 1959).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schlegel, F.
    (1808) Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg: Mohr u. Zimmer (English transl. byE. J. Millington. In: The Aesthetic and Miscellaneous Works of Friedrich von Schlegel, London: Bohn 1849, 425–526).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schleicher, A.
    (1860) Die deutsche Sprache. Stuttgart: Cotta.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1865) Über die Bedeutung der Sprache für die Naturgeschichte des Menschen. Weimar: Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schuchardt, H.
    (19282). Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier. Ein Vademekum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft, zusammengestellt und eingeleitet vonL. Spitzer. Niemeyer: Halle.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Swadesh, M.
    (1971) The Origin and Diversification of Language. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tavoni, M.
    (1998) “Renaissance Linguistics”. In: Lepschy, G. C. (ed.), History of Linguistics. Vol.III: Renaissance and Early Modern Linguistics. London and New York: Longman, 1–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Timpanaro, S.
    (1977) Friedrich Schlegel and the Development of Comparative Linguistics in the 19th Century. In: F. Schlegel, Über die Sprache und die Weisheit der Indier. Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Altertumskunde. With an introductory article bySebastiano Timpanaro. Translated from the Italian byJ. Peter Maher. Prepared byE. F. K. Koerner. Amsterdam: Benjamins, xi–xlviii.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Trombetti, A.
    (1905) L’unità d’origine del linguaggio. Bologna: Treves.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Trubetzkoy, N. S.
    (1939) Gedanken über das Indogermanenproblem. Acta Linguistica1, 81–89. 10.1080/03740463.1939.10410851
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1939.10410851 [Google Scholar]
  41. Whitney, W. D.
    (1873) Oriental and Linguistic Studies. New York: Scribner.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1884) Language and the Study of Language. London: Trübner.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (1887) The Life and Growth of Language. New York: Appleton.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error