1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this note, I ask what (if any) linguistic means above the word level might have already been in place before our full-blown syntactic capacity involving recursive Merge has evolved. I argue that the ‘pre-Merge era’ might have been characterized by paratactic emotive utterances comparable to root small clauses in modern languages. At the end of this contribution, this new emotive perspective on so-called ‘living linguistic fossils’ is extended to the core syntactic property of displacement, which features an augmentation strategy in the form of multiple copies that is reminiscent of doubling and reduplication processes involved in conveying expressive meaning components.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00005.tro
2019-04-24
2025-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/elt.00005.tro
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N.
    (2016) Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickerton, D.
    (1990) Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2012) The origins of syntactic language. In: Tallerman, M., Gibson, K. R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 456–468.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Börjars, K., Vincent, N.
    (2011) Grammaticalization and directionality. In: Narrog, H., Heine, B. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 162–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chomsky, N.
    (1956) Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions of Information Theory IT-2, 3, 113–124. 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
     https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. (2000) Minimalist inquiries. In: Martin, R., Michaels, D., Uriagereka, J. (eds.): Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. (2007) Approaching UG from below. In: Sauerland, U., Gärtner, H.-M. (eds.): Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2009) Opening remarks. In: Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., Salaburu, P. (eds.): Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Citko, B.
    (2011) Small clauses. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 748–763. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2011.00312.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00312.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Corver, N.
    (2013) Affective information packaging in the nominal domain. DGfS Conference 2013, Unversity of Potsdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W. T.
    (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heine, B., Kuteva, T.
    (2007) The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., Grohmann, K. K.
    (2005) Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840678
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840678 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hornstein, N., Pietroski, P. M.
    (2009) Basic operations: Minimal syntax-semantics. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, 113–139. 10.5565/rev/catjl.148
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.148 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jackendoff, R.
    (2002) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jakobson, R.
    (1960) Closing statements: Linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–377.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kallulli, D., Rothmayr, A.
    (2008) The syntax and semantics of indefinite determiner doubling constructions in varieties of German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 11, 95–136. 10.1007/s10828‑008‑9019‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-008-9019-z [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaplan, D.
    (1999) What is Meaning? Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Larson, B.
    (2015) Minimal search as a restriction on Merge. Lingua, 156, 57–69. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Narita, H.
    (2014) Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.218
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.218 [Google Scholar]
  23. Newmeyer, F. J.
    (2017) Form and function in the evolution of grammar. Cognitive Science, 41, 259–276. doi:  10.1111/cogs.12333
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12333 [Google Scholar]
  24. Niebuhr, O.
    (2010) On the phonetics of intensifying emphasis in German. Phonetica, 67, 170–198. 10.1159/000321054
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000321054 [Google Scholar]
  25. Norde, M.
    (2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Poletto, C., Zanuttini, R.
    (2013) Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from sì che/no che sentences. Lingua, 128, 124–141. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  27. Potts, C.
    (2005) The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2007) The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 165–198. 10.1515/TL.2007.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2012) Conventional implicature and expressive content. In: Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K., Portner, P. (eds.): Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Vol.3. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2516–2536.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Potts, C., Roeper, T.
    (2006) The narrowing acquisition path: From expressive small clauses to declaratives. In: Progovac, L., Paesani, K., Casielles, E., Barton, E. (eds.): The Syntax of Non-Sententials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 183–201. 10.1075/la.93.09pot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.93.09pot [Google Scholar]
  31. Progovac, L.
    (2006) The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In: Progovac, L., Paesani, K., Casielles, E., Barton, E. (eds.): The Syntax of Non-Sententials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–71. 10.1075/la.93.04pro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.93.04pro [Google Scholar]
  32. (2009) Layering of grammar: Vestiges of proto-syntax in present-day languages. In: Sampson, G., Gil, D., Trudgill, P. (eds.): Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 203–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2015) Evolutionary Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736547.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736547.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Radford, A.
    (1990) Syntactic Theory and the Acquistion of English Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sapir, E.
    (1921) Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sauerland, U., Trotzke, A.
    (2011) Biolinguistic perspectives on recursion: Introduction to the special issue. Biolinguistics, 5, 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Stowell, T. A.
    (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  38. Tallerman, M.
    (2014) No syntax saltation in language evolution. Language Sciences, 46, 207–219. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Terrace, H. S.
    (1979) Nim. New York: Knopf.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Tomasello, M.
    (2008) Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2014) The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 187–194. 10.1002/ejsp.2015
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2015 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2016) A Natural History of Human Morality. Harvard: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674915855
     https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915855 [Google Scholar]
  43. Trotzke, A.
    (2015) Rethinking Syntactocentrism: Architectural Issues and Case Studies at the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.225
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.225 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2017) The Grammar of Emphasis: From Information Structure to the Expressive Dimension. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501505881
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505881 [Google Scholar]
  45. Trotzke, A., Bader, M., Frazier, L.
    (2013) Third factors and the performance interface in language design. Biolinguistics, 7, 1–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Trotzke, A., Turco, G.
    (2015) The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua, 168, 37–56. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  47. Trotzke, A., Zwart, J.-W.
    (2014) The complexity of narrow syntax: Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest Merge. In: Newmeyer, F. J., Preston, L. B. (eds.): Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Uriagereka, J.
    (2008) Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481482
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481482 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00005.tro
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): evolution of language; expressive meaning; paratactic stage; small clauses; syntax

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error