1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Conceptualizing Evolution Education: A Corpus-Based Analysis of US Press Discourse

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00011gier
2020-01-24
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Croft, W., & D. A. Cruse
    (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  2. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 20–32. doi:  10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25467.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Hart, Ch.
    (2011) Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 269–286. 10.1177/0957926510395440
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395440 [Google Scholar]
  4. Janda, L.
    (2013) Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics. InL. A. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn (pp.1–32). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110335255.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335255.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Jäger, S., & F. Maier
    (2009) Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. InR. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.34–61). London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Scott, E.
    (2000) The Creation Evolution Continuum. The National Center for Science Education. Retrieved fromhttps://ncse.com/library-resource/creationevolution-continuum
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. InA. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (pp.63–105). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Talmy, L.
    (1988) Force Dynamics in Language Cognition. Cognitive Science, 12 (1), 49–100. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00011gier
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error