What are the determinants of survival curves of words?

References

1. Baumann, A. & Sommerer, L.
   (2018) Linguistic diversification as a long-term effect of asymmetric priming: an adaptive-dynamics approach. Language Dynamics and Change, 2(8): 253–296. 10.1163/22105832‑00802002
   https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00802002 [Google Scholar]
2. Baxter, G. J. , Blythe, R. A. , Croft, W. , & McKane, A. J.
   (2006) Utterance selection model of language change. Physical Review E73: 046118. 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.046118
   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.046118 [Google Scholar]
3. Blythe, R. A. , & Croft, W.
   (2012) S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language, 88(2): 269–304. 10.1353/lan.2012.0027
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027 [Google Scholar]
4. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J.
   (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Croft, W.
   (2000) Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Darwin, Ch.
   (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Cuypere, L.
   (2015) The Old English to-dative construction. English Language and Linguistics, 19: 1–26. 10.1017/S1360674314000276
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674314000276 [Google Scholar]
8. Dediu, D. , Cysouw, M. , Levinson, S. C. , Baronchelli, A. , Christiansen, M. H. , Croft, W. , Evans, N. , Garrod, S. , Gray, R. S. , Kandier, A. , & Lieven, E.
   (2013) Cultural evolution of language. In P. J. Richerson & M. H. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion. Strüngmann forum reports (pp.303–332). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019750.003.0016
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019750.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
9. Dubossarsky, H. , Weinshall, D. & Grossman, E.
   (2016) Verbs change more than nouns: a bottom-up computational approach to semantic change. Lingue e Linguaggio, 15(1): 5–25.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fonteyn, L. & Van de Pol, N.
    (2016) Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics, 20(2): 185–219. 10.1017/S1360674315000258
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000258 [Google Scholar]
11. Gries, S. Th.
    (2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13: 403–437. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri [Google Scholar]
12. Gries, S. Th. & Hilpert, M.
    (2010) Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: a multi-factorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3): 293–320. 10.1017/S1360674310000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000092 [Google Scholar]
13. Grossman, E. & Polis, S.
    (2017) Overall borrowing and borrowing in basic vocabulary: a typological perspective on lexical change in Ancient Egyptian-Coptic. Paper presented at 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE 2017) , Zürich.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Harrell, F. E. Jr.
    2(2015) Regression modeling. Strategies with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑19425‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 [Google Scholar]
15. Hosmer, D. W. , Lemeshow, S. & May, S.
    2(2008) Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time-to-event data. New York: John Wiley. 10.1002/9780470258019
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470258019 [Google Scholar]
16. Kassambara, A. , Kosinski, M. & Biecek, P.
    (2019) survminer: drawing survival curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer
17. Koplenig, A.
    (2017) Why the quantitative analysis of diachronic corpora that does not consider the temporal aspect of time-series can lead to wrong conclusions. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(1): 159–168.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Koplenig, A. & Müller-Spitzer, C.
    (2016) Population size predicts lexical diversity, but so does the mean sea level – why it is important to correctly account for the structure of temporal data. PLoS One, 11(3): e0150771. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150771
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150771 [Google Scholar]
19. Labov, W.
    (1994) Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lass, R.
    (1997) Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620928 [Google Scholar]
21. McMahon, A.
    (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166591
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166591 [Google Scholar]
22. Mesoudi, A.
    (2011) Cultural evolution. How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Morpurgo Davies, A.
    (1998) Nineteenth-century linguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
    (2014) Grammatical change begins within the word: causal modeling of the co-evolution of Icelandic morphology and syntax. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society36: 2657–2662.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pagel, M. , Atkinson, Q. D. & Meade, A.
    (2007) Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature, 449(7163): 717–720. 10.1038/nature06176
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06176 [Google Scholar]
26. Petré, P. & Van de Velde, F.
    (2018) The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language, 94(4): 867–901. 10.1353/lan.2018.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0056 [Google Scholar]
27. Pustet, R.
    (2004) Zipf and his heirs. Language Sciences26: 1–25. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(03)00018‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00018-4 [Google Scholar]
28. R: R Core Team
    R: R Core Team (2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ritt, N.
    (2004) Selfish Sounds: a Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486449
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486449 [Google Scholar]
30. Rosemeyer, M.
    (2013)  Tornar and volver: the interplay of frequency and semantics in compound tense auxiliary selection in Medieval and Classical Spanish. In: E. van Gelderen , J. Barðdal & M. Cennamo (Eds.), Argument structure in flux. The Naples-Capri papers (pp.435–458). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.131.16ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.16ros [Google Scholar]
31. Rosemeyer, M.
    (2014) Auxiliary Selection in Spanish. Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation. Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.155
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.155 [Google Scholar]
32. Rosemeyer, M.
    (2016) Modeling frequency effects in language change. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: frequency effects in language (175–207). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346916‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346916-008 [Google Scholar]
33. Rosemeyer, M. & Van de Velde, F.
    (2020) On cause and correlation in language change. Word order and clefting in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Dynamics and Change, 10, 1–37. 10.1163/22105832‑01001500
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-01001500 [Google Scholar]
34. Steels, L.
    (2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Review, 8: 339–356. 10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014 [Google Scholar]
35. Steels, L.
    (2017) Do languages evolve or merely change?Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43: 199–203. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.001 [Google Scholar]
36. Therneau, T. M.
    (2015) Survival: a package for survival analysis in S. Version 2.38. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival
37. Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M.
    (2000) Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑3294‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 [Google Scholar]
38. Van de Velde, F. & Petré, P.
    (2020) Historical linguistics. In D. Knight & S. Adolphs (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (328–359). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003031758‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-18 [Google Scholar]
39. Walkden, G.
    (2012) Why language change is not (language) evolution. University of Manchester FiL , 3November (2012 Slides available at: walkden.space/Walkden_2012_evo.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wickham, H. , Romain, F. , Henry, L. & Müller, K.
    (2020) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.8.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wolk, Chr. , Bresnan, J. , Rosenbach, A. & Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2013) Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica, 30(3): 382–419. 10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol [Google Scholar]
42. Zimmermann, R.
    (2017) Formal and quantitative approaches to the study of syntactic change: Three case studies from the history of English. PhD Diss., Université de Genève.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zipf, G. K.
    (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. New York: Addison-Wesley Press.
    [Google Scholar]