1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

An evolutionary approach to historical linguistics can be enlightening when not only the mechanisms, but also the statistical methods are considered from neighboring disciplines. In this short paper, we apply survival analysis to investigate what factors determine the lifespan of words. Our case study is on post-classical Greek from the 4th century to the beginning of the 8th century . We find that lower frequency and phonetically longer lexemes suffer earlier deaths. Furthermore, verbs turn out to have higher survival rates than adjectives and nouns.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00019.vel
2021-01-15
2021-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baumann, A. & Sommerer, L.
    (2018) Linguistic diversification as a long-term effect of asymmetric priming: an adaptive-dynamics approach. Language Dynamics and Change, 2(8): 253–296. 10.1163/22105832‑00802002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00802002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxter, G. J. , Blythe, R. A. , Croft, W. , & McKane, A. J.
    (2006) Utterance selection model of language change. Physical Review E73: 046118. 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.046118
    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.046118 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blythe, R. A. , & Croft, W.
    (2012) S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language, 88(2): 269–304. 10.1353/lan.2012.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0027 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J.
    (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, W.
    (2000) Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Darwin, Ch.
    (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Cuypere, L.
    (2015) The Old English to-dative construction. English Language and Linguistics, 19: 1–26. 10.1017/S1360674314000276
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674314000276 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dediu, D. , Cysouw, M. , Levinson, S. C. , Baronchelli, A. , Christiansen, M. H. , Croft, W. , Evans, N. , Garrod, S. , Gray, R. S. , Kandier, A. , & Lieven, E.
    (2013) Cultural evolution of language. In P. J. Richerson & M. H. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion. Strüngmann forum reports (pp.303–332). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019750.003.0016
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019750.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubossarsky, H. , Weinshall, D. & Grossman, E.
    (2016) Verbs change more than nouns: a bottom-up computational approach to semantic change. Lingue e Linguaggio, 15(1): 5–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fonteyn, L. & Van de Pol, N.
    (2016) Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics, 20(2): 185–219. 10.1017/S1360674315000258
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000258 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gries, S. Th.
    (2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13: 403–437. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri [Google Scholar]
  12. Gries, S. Th. & Hilpert, M.
    (2010) Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: a multi-factorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3): 293–320. 10.1017/S1360674310000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000092 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grossman, E. & Polis, S.
    (2017) Overall borrowing and borrowing in basic vocabulary: a typological perspective on lexical change in Ancient Egyptian-Coptic. Paper presented at 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE 2017) , Zürich.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harrell, F. E. Jr.
    2(2015) Regression modeling. Strategies with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑19425‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hosmer, D. W. , Lemeshow, S. & May, S.
    2(2008) Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time-to-event data. New York: John Wiley. 10.1002/9780470258019
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470258019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kassambara, A. , Kosinski, M. & Biecek, P.
    (2019) survminer: drawing survival curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer
  17. Koplenig, A.
    (2017) Why the quantitative analysis of diachronic corpora that does not consider the temporal aspect of time-series can lead to wrong conclusions. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(1): 159–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Koplenig, A. & Müller-Spitzer, C.
    (2016) Population size predicts lexical diversity, but so does the mean sea level – why it is important to correctly account for the structure of temporal data. PLoS One, 11(3): e0150771. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150771
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150771 [Google Scholar]
  19. Labov, W.
    (1994) Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lass, R.
    (1997) Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620928 [Google Scholar]
  21. McMahon, A.
    (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166591
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166591 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mesoudi, A.
    (2011) Cultural evolution. How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Morpurgo Davies, A.
    (1998) Nineteenth-century linguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
    (2014) Grammatical change begins within the word: causal modeling of the co-evolution of Icelandic morphology and syntax. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society36: 2657–2662.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pagel, M. , Atkinson, Q. D. & Meade, A.
    (2007) Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature, 449(7163): 717–720. 10.1038/nature06176
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06176 [Google Scholar]
  26. Petré, P. & Van de Velde, F.
    (2018) The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language, 94(4): 867–901. 10.1353/lan.2018.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0056 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pustet, R.
    (2004) Zipf and his heirs. Language Sciences26: 1–25. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(03)00018‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00018-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. R: R Core Team
    R: R Core Team (2019R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ritt, N.
    (2004) Selfish Sounds: a Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486449
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486449 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rosemeyer, M.
    (2013)  Tornar and volver: the interplay of frequency and semantics in compound tense auxiliary selection in Medieval and Classical Spanish. In: E. van Gelderen , J. Barðdal & M. Cennamo (Eds.), Argument structure in flux. The Naples-Capri papers (pp.435–458). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.131.16ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.16ros [Google Scholar]
  31. (2014) Auxiliary Selection in Spanish. Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation. Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.155
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.155 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2016) Modeling frequency effects in language change. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: frequency effects in language (175–207). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346916‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346916-008 [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosemeyer, M. & Van de Velde, F.
    (2020) On cause and correlation in language change. Word order and clefting in Brazilian Portuguese. Language Dynamics and Change, 10, 1–37. 10.1163/22105832‑01001500
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-01001500 [Google Scholar]
  34. Steels, L.
    (2011) Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Review, 8: 339–356. 10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2017) Do languages evolve or merely change?Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43: 199–203. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Therneau, T. M.
    (2015) Survival: a package for survival analysis in S. Version 2.38. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival
  37. Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M.
    (2000) Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑3294‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 [Google Scholar]
  38. Van de Velde, F. & Petré, P.
    (2020) Historical linguistics. In D. Knight & S. Adolphs (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (328–359). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003031758‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-18 [Google Scholar]
  39. Walkden, G.
    (2012) Why language change is not (language) evolution. University of Manchester FiL , 3November (2012 Slides available at: walkden.space/Walkden_2012_evo.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wickham, H. , Romain, F. , Henry, L. & Müller, K.
    (2020) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.8.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolk, Chr. , Bresnan, J. , Rosenbach, A. & Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2013) Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica, 30(3): 382–419. 10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol [Google Scholar]
  42. Zimmermann, R.
    (2017) Formal and quantitative approaches to the study of syntactic change: Three case studies from the history of English. PhD Diss., Université de Genève.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zipf, G. K.
    (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. New York: Addison-Wesley Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00019.vel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00019.vel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error