Introduction

References

1. Chomsky, N.
   (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrect: Foris.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chomsky, N.
   (2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22. 10.1162/0024389052993655
   https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
3. Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R.
   (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 205, 581–598.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Haspelmath, M.
   (1999) Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 18, 180–205. 10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.2.180
   https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.2.180 [Google Scholar]
5. Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T.
   (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
6. Leiss, E.
   (2000) Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110825961
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825961 [Google Scholar]
7. Manzini, M. R., & Savoia, L. M.
   (2005) Le varietà italiane e romance. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
   [Google Scholar]