1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00029.hai
2021-08-02
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adami, Ch. & Ofria, Ch. & Collier, T. C.
    (2000) Evolution of biological complexity. pnas, 97(9), 4463–4468. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463 [Google Scholar]
  2. Buller, D. J.
    (2005) Adapting minds: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, J.
    (2009) Language universals and usage-based theory. InM. H. Christiansen & Ch. Collins, & Edelman, S. (Eds.). Language Universals (pp.17–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305432.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305432.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, N.
    (2007) Approaching UG from below. InH.-M. Gärtner & U. Sauerland (Eds.). Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics. Studies in Generative Grammar (pp.1–29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. & Reali, F.
    (2009) The biological and cultural foundations of language. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(3), 221–222. 10.4161/cib.2.3.8034
    https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.2.3.8034 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cummins, R.
    (1975) Functional analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72, 741–765. 10.2307/2024640
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2024640 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2002) Neo-Teleology. In: A. Ariew & R. Cummins & M. Perlman (eds.) Functions: New Essays in Philosophy of Psychology and Biology (pp.157–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Boer, Bart & Thompson, Bill & Ravignani, A. & Boeckx, C.
    (2020) Evolutionary dynamics do not motivate a single-mutant theory of human language. Scientific Reports, 10, art. 451. 10.1038/s41598‑019‑57235‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57235-8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin
    (Eds.) (2013) The World Atlas of Language Structures online. (wals.info).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R.
    (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. of the Royal Society London B, 205, 581–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gould, S. J.
    (2000) The lying stones of Marrakech: penultimate reflections in natural history. Boston: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674063372
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674063372 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haider, H.
    (1991) Die menschliche Sprachfähigkeit – exaptiv und kognitiv opak. Kognitionswissenschaft, 2, 11–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2014) The VO-OV split of Germanic languages – a T3 & V2 production. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis, 19(1), 57–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2015) “Intelligent design” of grammars – a result of cognitive evolution. InA. Adli, G. Marco García, & G. Kaufmann (Eds.) Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches, 205–240. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346855‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346855-009 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2018) Grammatiktheorien im Vintage-Look – Viel Ideologie, wenig Ertrag. InWöllstein, A. & Gallmann, P. & Habermann, M. & Krifka, M. (eds.). Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in der germanistischen Linguistik, 47–92. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110490992‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110490992-003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haider, Hubert
    (2019) An anthropic principle in lieu of a “Universal Grammar”. InBrown, J. M. & Schmidt, A. & Wierzba, M. (eds.) Of trees and birds, 363–381. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haider, H.
    (2020) A null theory of Scrambling. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 39(3), 375–405. [Struckmeier, V. & Pankau, A. (eds.). Special issue on indeterminacies and mismatches in grammatical systems]. 10.1515/zfs‑2020‑2019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2020-2019 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hawkins, J. A.
    (2014) Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hedström, P. & Stern, Ch.
    (2008) Rational Choice and Sociology. InS. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp.872–877). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑95121‑5_2736‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2736-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hempel, C. G.
    (1959) The logic of functional analysis. In: L. Gross (Ed.) Symposium on Sociological Theory (pp.271–307). New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Höfer, T. & Przyrembel, H. & Verleger, S.
    (2004) New evidence for the Theory of the Stork. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 18, 88–92. 10.1111/j.1365‑3016.2003.00534.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2003.00534.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Jespersen, O.
    (1894) Progress in language; with special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kriengwatana, B. & Escudero, P. & Ten Cate, C.
    (2015) Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01543
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01543 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lamarck, J.-B.
    (1830) Philosophie Zoologique. Paris: Germer Billière. (new ed.). 10.5962/bhl.title.50194
    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50194 [Google Scholar]
  26. Leiss, E.
    (2000) Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110825961
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825961 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayr, E.
    (1982) The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagel, E.
    (1961) The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World Inc. 10.1119/1.1937571
    https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571 [Google Scholar]
  29. Premack, D.
    (1985) “Gavagai!” or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90036‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90036-8 [Google Scholar]
  30. Simon, H. A.
    (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. 10.2307/1884852
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Valin, R. D. Jr.
    (2017) Functional linguistics: Communicative functions and language structure. InM. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.). The Handbook of Linguistics (pp.141–157). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119072256.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072256.ch8 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00029.hai
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00029.hai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Reply
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error