oa The evolution of expletives

References

1. Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E.
   (1998) Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 161, 491–539. 10.1023/A:1006090432389
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389 [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, K.
   (1971) A note on the source of There in existential sentences. Foundations of Language, 7.11, 1–18.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asher, N. & Lascarides, A.
   (2003) Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Axel, K.
   (2007) Studies on Old High German syntax: left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.112
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
5. Axel, K.
   (2009) The verb-second property in Old High German: Different ways of filling the prefield. InR. Hinterhölzl & S. Petrova (Eds.), Information Structure and Language Change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic (pp.17–44). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216110.1.17
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216110.1.17 [Google Scholar]
6. Ball, C. N.
   (1994) The origins of the informative-presupposition it-cleft. Journal of Pragmatics, 22.61, 603–628. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90032‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90032-9 [Google Scholar]
7. Bayer, J. & Suchsland, P.
   (1997) Expletiva und leere Subjekte im Deutschen. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, 411, 12–38.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bentley, D. & Cruschina, S.
   (2018) The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), 1181, 1–37.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Berwick, R. C. & Chomsky, N.
   (2017) Why only us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Biberauer, T. & van der Wal, J.
    (2014) Expletives beyond English. Ms., University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bickerton, D.
    (1990) Language and species. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Bolinger, D.
    (1977) Meaning and form. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Booth, H.
    (2018) Expletives and clause structure. Syntactic change in Icelandic. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Breivik, L.
    (1989) On the causes of syntactic change in English. InL. Breivik & E. H. Jahr (Eds.), Language change: Contributions to the studies of its causes (pp.29–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110853063.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853063.29 [Google Scholar]
15. Bruening, B.
    (2010) Language-particular syntactic rules and constraints: English Locative Inversion and do-support. Language, 861, 43–84. 10.1353/lan.0.0201
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0201 [Google Scholar]
16. Brugmann, K.
    (1917) Der Ursprung des Scheinsubjekts ‘es’ in den germanischen und den romanischen Sprachen. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft für Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse, 69:5. Leipzig: Trübner.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Burt, M.
    (1971) From Deep to Surface Structure. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Butler, M. C.
    (1980) Grammatically motivated subjects in Early English. Ph. D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bybee, J. L.
    (1985) Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
20. Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca, W. & Perkins, R.
    (1990) On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. InW. Croft, K. Denning and S. Kemmer (Eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony (pp.1–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.20.04byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.20.04byb [Google Scholar]
21. Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W.
    (1994) The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect and modality in the languages oft the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Camacho, J.
    (2013) Null subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524407 [Google Scholar]
23. Cardinaletti, A.
    (1990) Impersonal constructions and sentential arguments in German, Padua: Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Chierchia, G.
    (1984) Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chomsky, N.
    (1982) Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chomsky, N.
    (2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. InR. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp.89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Chomsky, N.
    (2001) Derivation by phase. InM. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp.1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
30. Chomsky, N.
    (2008) On phases. InR. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
31. Coopmans, P.
    (1989) Where stylistic and syntactic processes meet: locative inversion in English. Language, 65(4), 728–751. 10.2307/414932
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414932 [Google Scholar]
32. Corr, A.
    (2017) The grammaticalization of epistemicity in Ibero-Romance: alike processes, unlike outcomes. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 7(1), 48–76. 10.1075/jhl.7.1‑2.03cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.03cor [Google Scholar]
33. Czicza, D.
    (2010) Das simulierende es. Zur valenztheoretischen Beschreibung des nicht-phorischen es am Beispiel eines neuhochdeutschen Textes. InA. Ziegler (Ed.), Historische Textgrammatik und Historische Syntax des Deutschen (pp.1042–1061). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219944.1041
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219944.1041 [Google Scholar]
34. Dryer, M.
    (2007) Clause types. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 1: Clause structure (pp.224–275). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.004 [Google Scholar]
35. Ecay, A.
    (2015) A multi-step analysis of the evolution of English do-support. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
36. Ellegård, A.
    (1953) The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Emonds, J.
    (1970) Root and structure-preserving transformations. Doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
38. Espinal, M. T.
    (1992) Expletive negation and logical absorption. The Linguistic Review, 9(4), 333–358. 10.1515/tlir.1992.9.4.333
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1992.9.4.333 [Google Scholar]
39. Espinal, M. T.
    (2000) Expletive negation, negative concord and feature checking. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 81, 47–69.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Faarlund, J. T.
    (1990) Syntactic change. Toward a theory of historical syntax. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110854947
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854947 [Google Scholar]
41. Falk, C.
    (1993) Non-referential subjects and agreement in the history of Swedish. Lingua, 89(2–3), 143–180. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90051‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90051-W [Google Scholar]
42. Fintel, K. von
    (1995) The formal semantics of grammaticalization. InJ. N. Beckman (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 25: Papers from the Workshops on Language Acquisition and Language Change (pp.175–189), Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Fintel, K. von & Matthewson, L.
    (2008) Universals in semantics. The Linguistic Review, 251, 139–201. 10.1515/TLIR.2008.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLIR.2008.004 [Google Scholar]
44. Fitch, W. T.
    (2010) The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511817779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 [Google Scholar]
45. Freeze, R.
    (1992) Existentials and Other Locatives. Language, 68(3), 553–595. 10.2307/415794
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415794 [Google Scholar]
46. Freeze, R.
    (2001) Existential constructions. InM. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals, vol. 2 (pp.941–953). Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Fuß, E.
    (2008) Word order and language change. On the interface between syntax and morphology. Habilitation thesis, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Fuß, E.
    (2024a) Exploring the link between expletives and broad focus: A diachronic perspective. Paper presented atthe workshop Sentence Grammar — Discourse Grammar, Ca‘ Foscari University of Venice.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Fuß, E.
    (2024b) On the lifecycle of expletives. Paper presented atDiachronic Generative Syntax 25, University of Mannheim.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Fuß, E. & Hinterhölzl, R.
    (2023) On the historical development of pronouns referring to situations: the case of so-called ‘expletives’ in Germanic. Journal of Historical Syntax7(2), 1–54.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Gaeta, L.
    (2013) Existential constructions: A semasiological perspective. InE. van Gelderen, M. Cennamo & J. Barðdal (Eds.), Argument structure in flux: The Naples-Capri papers (pp.477–509). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.131.18gae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.131.18gae [Google Scholar]
52. Garzonio, J.
    (2021) Some considerations on the syntax of expletive subjects in Old Venetan and the emergence of subject clitics. Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese. 20201, 61–72. 10.54103/1972‑9901/16696
    https://doi.org/10.54103/1972-9901/16696 [Google Scholar]
53. Gast, V. & Haas, F.
    (2011) On the distribution of subject properties in formulaic presentationals of Germanic and Romance. InA. Malchukov & A. Siewierska (Eds.), Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective (pp.127–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.05gas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.05gas [Google Scholar]
54. Givón, T.
    (1976) Topic, Pronoun, and Grammatical Agreement. InC. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp.149–188). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Givón, T.
    (1995) Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.74
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.74 [Google Scholar]
56. Grewendorf, G.
    (1989) Ergativity in German. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110859256
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859256 [Google Scholar]
57. Haeberli, E.
    (1999) Features, categories and the syntax of A-positions. Synchronic and diachronic variation in the Germanic languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.
58. Haegeman, L., Greco, C. & Phan, T.
    (2017) Expletives and speaker-related meaning. InM. Sheehan & L. R. Bailey (Eds.), Order and structure in syntax II: subjecthood and argument structure (pp.69–93). Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Haider, H.
    (1993) Deutsche Syntax, generativ. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Haider, H.
    (2010) The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845314 [Google Scholar]
61. Haider, H.
    (2015) “Intelligent design” of grammars — a result of cognitive evolution. InA. Adli, M. G. García & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches (pp.205–240). Berlin/New York, NY: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346855‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346855-009 [Google Scholar]
62. Haider, H.
    (2019) On expletive, semantically void, and absent subjects. InB. Pöll, P. Herbeck & A. Wolfsgruber (Eds.), Semantic and syntactic aspects of impersonality (special issue of Linguistische Berichte) (pp.11–46). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Haider, H.
    (2021) Grammar change — A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory, 3(1), 6–55. 10.1075/elt.00024.hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00024.hai [Google Scholar]
64. Haider, H.
    (2023) SVO — Attractor in the declarative-to-procedural shift in grammar evolution. Acta Linguistica Academica, 701, 195–218. 10.1556/2062.2023.00642
    https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00642 [Google Scholar]
65. Haiman, J.
    (1974) Targets and syntactic change. Den Haag: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110882889
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882889 [Google Scholar]
66. Han, C. & A. Kroch
    2000 The rise of do-support in English: implications for clause structure. InM. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall and J.-Y. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS301 (pp.311–326). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Hartmann, J.
    (2008) Expletives in existentials: English there and German da. (LOT Dissertation Series 181). Utrecht: LOT.
68. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T.
    (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
69. Hawkins, J. A.
    (1990) A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry, 211, 223–261.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Hawkins, J. A.
    (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Hawkins, J. A.
    (2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
72. Hazout, I.
    (2004) The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 351, 393–430. 10.1162/0024389041402616
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402616 [Google Scholar]
73. Heck, F.
    (2022) Empty expletives and the EPP. Paper presented atthe workshop The Theory and Historical Development of Expletives (and non-referential arguments), Ruhr-University Bochum.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
    (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
75. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
    (2007) The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
76. Hinterhölzl, R.
    (2019) Subjects, topics, and anchoring to the context. Syntax, 221, 199–228. 10.1111/synt.12179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12179 [Google Scholar]
77. Hinzelin, M.-O.
    (2009) Neuter pronouns in Ibero-Romance: Discourse reference, expletives and beyond. InG. A. Kaiser & E.-M. Remberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Null-subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance” (pp.1–25). Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Husband, M. E.
    (2012) On the compositional nature of states. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.188
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.188 [Google Scholar]
79. Ingham, R.
    (2001) The structure and function of expletive there in pre-modern English. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics, 51, 231–249.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Jackendoff, R.
    (1999) Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 31, 272–279. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(99)01333‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01333-9 [Google Scholar]
81. Jackendoff, R.
    (2002) Foundations of Language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
82. Jenkins, L.
    (1975) The English existential. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111357188
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357188 [Google Scholar]
83. Jin, Y. & Koenig, J.-P.
    (2020) A cross-linguistic study of expletive negation. Linguistic Typology, 251, 39–78. 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑2053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2053 [Google Scholar]
84. Julien, M.
    (2002) Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195149500.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195149500.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
85. Kaiser, E.
    (2019) Word order patterns in generic ‘zero person’ constructions in Finnish: Insights from speech-act participants. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4(1). 53–1. 10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4558
    https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4558 [Google Scholar]
86. Kinn, K.
    (2016) Referential vs. non-referential null subjects in Middle Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 39(3), 277–310. 10.1017/S0332586516000068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586516000068 [Google Scholar]
87. Kratzer, A.
    (1995) Stage level and individual level predicates. InG. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp.125–175). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Lahousse, K.
    (2003a) On the non-unitariness of NP subject inversion. InJ. Quer, J. Schroten, M. Scorretti, P. Sleeman & E. Verheugd (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2001. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Amsterdam, 6–8 December 2001 (pp.177–192). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.245.11lah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.245.11lah [Google Scholar]
89. Lahousse, K.
    (2003b) NP-subject inversion in French and (preposed) adverbs. InA. T. Pérez-Leroux & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition (pp.181–96). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.244.14lah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.244.14lah [Google Scholar]
90. Lahousse, K.
    (2007) Implicit stage topics. Discour. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique, 11, 1–18. 10.4000/discours.117
    https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.117 [Google Scholar]
91. Lahousse, K.
    (2011) Quand passent les cigognes. le sujet nominal postverbal en Français moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
93. Langacker, R.
    (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Langacker, R.
    (2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
95. Larsson, I.
    (2014) Choice of non-referential subject in existential constructions and with weather-verbs. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) Journal, 11, 55–71.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Legendre, G.
    (1990) French impersonal constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 81, 81–128. 10.1007/BF00205532
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205532 [Google Scholar]
97. Lenerz, J.
    (1985) Zur Theorie syntaktischen Wandels: Das expletive es in der Geschichte des Deutschen. InW. Abraham (Ed.), Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen (pp.99–136). Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M.
    (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Liebermann, P.
    (1984) The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Light, C.
     (2015) Expletive there in West Germanic. InT. Biberauer & G. Walkden (Eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions (pp.17–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
101. Malchukov, A. & Siewierska, A.
     (eds.) (2011) Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124 [Google Scholar]
102. Manzini, R. & Savoia, L.
     (1997) Null subjects without pro. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 91, 301–313.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Mathieu, É.
     (2006) Quirky subjects in Old French. Studia Linguistica, 60(3), 282–312. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2006.00128.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00128.x [Google Scholar]
104. May, R.
     (1991) Syntax, semantics, and logical form. InA. Kasher (Ed.), The Chomskyan Turn (pp.334–359). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
105. McCawley, J.
     (1970) English as a VSO language. Language, 46(2), 286–299. 10.2307/412279
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412279 [Google Scholar]
106. Milsark, G.
     (1974) Existential sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted: New York: Garland 1979.
107. Mohr, S.
     (2005) Clausal architecture and subject positions: Impersonal constructions in the Germanic languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.88
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.88 [Google Scholar]
108. Moro, A.
     (1997) The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519956
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519956 [Google Scholar]
109. Narrog, H. & Heine, B.
     (eds.) (2011) The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Newmeyer, F. J.
     (2005) Possible and probable languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
111. Partee, B. H.
     (1987) Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. InJ. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp.115–143). Dordrecht: Reidel.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Partee, B. H.
     (1992) Syntactic categories and semantic type. InM. Rosner & R. Johnson (Eds.), Computational linguistics and formal semantics (pp.97–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611803.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611803.004 [Google Scholar]
113. Pfenninger, S. E.
     (2009) Grammaticalization paths of English and High German existential constructions: A corpus-based study. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Poletto, C.
     (2005) Sì and e as CP expletives in Old Italian. InM. Batllori, M.-L. Hernanz, C. Picallo & F. Roca (Eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation (pp.206–235). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0013
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272129.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
115. Postal, P. M.
     (2004) Skeptical linguistic essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195166712.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195166712.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
116. Prince, E. F.
     (1978) A comparison of WH-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54(4), 883–906. 10.2307/413238
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413238 [Google Scholar]
117. Richards, M. & Biberauer, T.
     (2005) Explaining expl. InM. den Dikken & C. Tortora (Eds.), The function of function words and functional categories (pp.115–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.78.06ric
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.78.06ric [Google Scholar]
118. Rizzi, L.
     (1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110883718
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883718 [Google Scholar]
119. Roberts, I., & Roussou, A.
     (2003) Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
120. Ross, J. R.
     (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
121. Ross, J. R.
     (1973) A fake NP squish. InC.-J. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English (pp.96–140). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
122. Sells, P.
     (2005) The peripherality of the Icelandic expletive. InM. Butt & T. Holloway King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG’05 conference (pp.408–428). Standford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Siewierska, A.
     (2008) Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. verbal strategies. InG. González, M. de los Ángeles, J. L. Mackenzie & E. M. González Álvarez, (Eds.), Current trends in contrastive linguistics. Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp.3–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie [Google Scholar]
124. Sigurðardottir, S. S. & Eythórsson, T.
     (2019) Stability and change in Icelandic weather verbs: Syntax, semantics and argument structure. InA. Breitbarth, M. Bouzouita, L. Danckaert & M. Farasyn (Eds.), The determinants of diachronic stability (pp.69–99). Amsterdam: Benjamin. 10.1075/la.254.04sig
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.254.04sig [Google Scholar]
125. Sluckin, B. L.
     (2021) Non-canonical subjects and subject positions: locative inversion, V2-violations, and feature inheritance. PhD Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Sluckin, B. L., Cruschina, S. & Martin, F.
     (2021) Locative inversion in Germanic and Romance: a conspiracy theory. InC. Meklenborg & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Germanic and Romance: Continuity and variation (pp.165–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
127. Smith, A. D. M.
     (2011) Grammaticalization and language evolution. InH. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp.142–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0012 [Google Scholar]
128. Svenonius, P.
     (eds.) 2002 Subjects, expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195142242.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195142242.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
129. Tomaselli, A. & Bidese, E.
     (2023) Fortune and decay of lexical expletives in Germanic and Romance along the Adige River. Languages, 8(1), 441: 1–20. 10.3390/languages8010044
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010044 [Google Scholar]
130. Tsiakmakis, E. & Espinal, M. T.
     (2022) Expletiveness in grammar and beyond. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 7(1), 1–36.
     [Google Scholar]
131. Vikner, S.
     (1995) Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
132. Williams, E.
     (1994) Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
133. Williams, E.
     (2006) The subject-predicate theory of there. Linguistic Inquiry, 371, 648–651. 10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648 [Google Scholar]
134. Witzenhausen, E.
     (2019) Negation — exception — contrast: the post-cyclical development of ne/en in Middle High German, Middle Low German and Middle Dutch. PhD thesis, Ghent University.
     [Google Scholar]
135. Wouden, T. van der
     (1994) Polarity and ‘Illogical Negation’. InM. Kanazawa & C. J. Pin͂ón (Eds.), Dynamics, polarity, and quantification (pp.17–48). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]