1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This paper addresses the question to what extent locative/situational proforms such as German , Dutch / and English are to be considered expletives. It considers the main contexts of use for all three languages, their appearance as modifiers, in existential constructions and in other potential expletive positions, such as Spec,TP and Spec,CP, as well as the uses as correlates to clauses. The paper argues that all three locative-based proforms act as situation proforms, though they show differences in their syntax. English is restricted to locative modifier uses and can only appear as situation proform in the existential constructions; German appears in existential contexts, and it also has a situation proform use in modifier position. Dutch has the broadest distribution ranging from existential to Spec,TP and — resulting from that — Spec,CP positions. Finally, Dutch and German occur as correlate with prepositional object clauses. The paper offers a comparative analysis in which the difference between those elements result from different base positions and other general differences between the languages.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00055.har
2025-03-06
2025-03-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/elt.00055.har
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/elt.00055.har.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00055.har&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexiadou, A. & Schäfer, F.
    (2019) An unaccusativity diagnostic at the syntax-semantics interface: ’there’-insertion, indefinites and restitutive ’again’. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 151, 101–116.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbiers, S. & Rooryck, J.
    (1999) On the interpretation of there in Existentials. InK. Shahin, S. Blake & E.-S. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL171 (pp. 59–73). Stanford: CSLI.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer, J. & Suchsland, P.
    (1997) Expletiva und leere Subjekte im Deutschen. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 411, 12–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennis, H.
    (1987) Gaps and Dummies (Reprint 2010). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110889536
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889536 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biberauer, T.
    (2004) Reconsidering the EPP and Spec-TP in Germanic. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics COPiL, 11, 15–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Breindl, E.
    (1989) Präpositionalobjekte und Präpositionalobjektsätze im Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783111358437
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111358437 [Google Scholar]
  7. Broekhuis, H.
    (2013) Syntax of Dutch. Adpositions and Adposition Phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_462289
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_462289 [Google Scholar]
  8. Broekhuis, H. & Corver, N.
    (2019) Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and Verb Phrases. Volume III. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Broekhuis, H. & Dikken, M. d.
    (2012) Syntax of Dutch. Nouns and Noun Phrases: Bd. 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. COSMAS II (Corpus Search, Management and Analysis System)
    COSMAS II (Corpus Search, Management and Analysis System) (1991–2012) Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Deal, A. R.
    (2009) The Origin and Context of Expletives: Evidence from ‘Selection’. Syntax, 12(4), 285–323. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2009.00127.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00127.x [Google Scholar]
  13. DeReKo — Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus, Ausgabe 2006-I
    DeReKo — Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus, Ausgabe 2006-I (2006) www.ids-mannheim.de/kl/projekte/korpora/. Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim.
  14. Diesing, M.
    (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Donaldson, B.
    (2008) Dutch. A Comprehensive Grammar (2nd ed.). London / New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203895320
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895320 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017) Dutch: A Comprehensive Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315620787
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620787 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehrich, V.
    (1982) Da and the System of Spatial Deixis in German. InJ. Weissenborn & W. Klein (Eds.), Here and There: Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration (pp. 43–63). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.iii.2‑3.03ehr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iii.2-3.03ehr [Google Scholar]
  18. (1992) Hier und Jetzt: Studien zur lokalen und temporalen Deixis im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111353937
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111353937 [Google Scholar]
  19. Elliott, P.
    (2020) Elements of clausal embedding (Doctoral dissertation, University College London, London).
  20. Felser, C. & Rupp, L.
    (1997) A Minimalist Approach to Existential Constructions in Germanic. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 45–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2001) Expletives as Arguments: Germanic Existential Sentences Revisited. Linguistische Berichte, 1871, 289–324.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Frey, W.
    (2004) A Medial Topic Position for German. Linguistische Berichte, 1981, 153–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2016) On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses. InW. Frey, A. Meinunger & K. Schwabe (Eds.), Inner-sentential propositional proforms (pp. 73–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.232.04fre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.232.04fre [Google Scholar]
  24. Frey, W. & Pittner, K.
    (1998) Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte, 1761, 489–534.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuß, E.
    (2024) Some remarks on the properties and analysis of expletive ‘es’ in German. Manuscript, University of Bochum.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fuß, E. & Hinterhölzl, R.
    (2023) On The Historical Development Of Pronouns Referring To Situations: The Rise Of Pre-Finite ‘Expletives’ In German. Journal of Historical Syntax, 71, 1–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gunkel, L. & Hartmann, J. M.
    (2020) Remarks on prepositional object clauses in Germanic. Nordlyd, 44(1), 69–91. 10.7557/12.5244
     https://doi.org/10.7557/12.5244 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2021) Präpositionalobjektsätze im europäischen Vergleich. InH. Lobin, A. Witt & A. Wöllstein-Leisten (Eds.), Deutsch in Europa (pp. 111–134). 10.1515/9783110731514‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110731514-008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haider, H.
    (1997) Projective Economy: On the Minimal Functional Structure of the German clause. InW. Abraham & E. van Gelderen (Eds.), German: Syntactic Problems — Problematic Syntax (pp. 83–103). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110914726‑006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914726-006 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2010) The Syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845314
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845314 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hartman, J.
    (2012) Varieties of clausal complementation (Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA).
  32. Hartmann, J. M.
    (2008) Expletives in Existentials: English there and German da. Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2011) Predicate Inversion and English there-sentences. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 58(3), 221–240. 10.1556/ALing.58.2011.3.2
     https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.58.2011.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2022) Clausal arguments of adjectival predicates: Evidence from wh- movement. InG. Alboiu, D. Isac & A. Nicolae (Eds.), A Life in Linguistics: A Festschrift for Alexandra Cornilescu on her 75th Birthday (pp. 359–368). Bucharest: Bucharest University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hazout, I.
    (2004) The Syntax of Existential Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 351, 393–430. 10.1162/0024389041402616
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402616 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hinterhölzl, R.
    (2019) Subjects, topics, and anchoring to the context. Syntax, 221, 199–228. 10.1111/synt.12179
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12179 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2024) Giving content to expletive ‘es’ in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 27(1). 10.1007/s10828‑023‑09146‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09146-2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Huijbregts, R.
    (1991) Clitics. InJ. Model (Ed.), Grammatische analyse: Syntactische verschijnselen in het Nederlands en het Engels (pp. 227–269). Dordrecht: ICG publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Jenkins, L.
    (1975) The English Existential. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111357188
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357188 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jong, F. d. & Verkuyl, H.
    (1985) Generalized quantifiers: The properness of their strength. InJ. van Benthem & A. G. B. ter Meulen (Eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language (pp. 270–285). Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110867909.21
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867909.21 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kirsner, R. S.
    (1979) The problem of presentative sentences in Modern Dutch. Amsterdam: North Holland.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Koster, J.
    (1978) Why Subject Sentences Don’t Exist. InS. J. Keyser (Ed.), Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages (pp. 53–64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kratzer, A.
    (2007) Situations in Natural Language Semantics. InE. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2007 Edition). Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, University of Stanford.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Maienborn, C.
    (2001) On the Position and Interpretation of Locative Modifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 91, 191–240. 10.1023/A:1012405607146
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012405607146 [Google Scholar]
  45. Milsark, G. L.
    (1974) Existential Sentences in English. New York/ London: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (1977) Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential con-struction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3(1), 1–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mohr, S.
    (2005) Clausal architecture and subject positions: impersonal constructions in the Ger-manic languages. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.88
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.88 [Google Scholar]
  48. Moro, A.
    (1997) The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519956
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519956 [Google Scholar]
  49. Moulton, K.
    (2009) Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst).
     [Google Scholar]
  50. (2015) CPs: Copies and Compositionality. Linguistic inquiry, 46(2), 305–342. 10.1162/LING_a_00183
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00183 [Google Scholar]
  51. Neeleman, A. & Weerman, F.
    (1999) Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Case and Arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4289‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4289-2 [Google Scholar]
  52. Richards, M. & Biberauer, T.
    (2005) Explaining Expl. InM. den Dikken & C. Tortora (Eds.), The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories (pp. 115–153). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.78.06ric
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.78.06ric [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosenbaum, P. S.
    (1967) The Grammar of English Predicate — Complement Constructions. Cambridge: MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ruys, E. G.
    (2001) Dutch Scrambling and the Strong-Weak Distinction. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 41, 39–67. 10.1023/A:1012209621512
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012209621512 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sluckin, B. L.
    (2021) Non-canonical subjects and subject positions: Locative inversion, v2-violations, and feature inheritance. 10.18452/23715
     https://doi.org/10.18452/23715 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sternefeld, W.
    (2009) Syntax: Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen (31., überarb. Aufl.). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Sudhoff, S.
    (2003) Argumentsätze und es-Korrelate: Zur syntaktischen Struktur von Neben-satzeinbettungen im Deutschen. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. (2016) Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch. InW. Frey, A. Meinunger & K. Schwabe (Eds.), Inner-sentential propositional proforms (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/la.232.02sud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.232.02sud [Google Scholar]
  59. Thráinsson, H.
    (2007) The Syntax of Icelandic. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619441
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619441 [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Noord, G., Schuurman, I., & Vandeghinste, V.
    (2006) Syntactic Annotation of Large Corpora in STEVIN. InN. Calzolari, K. Choukri, A. Gangemi, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp.1811-1814). Genoa, Italy: ELRA.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Williams, E.
    (1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. (2006) The Subject-Predicate Theory of there. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(4), 648–651. 10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zamparelli, R.
    (2000) Layers in the Determiner Phrase. New York/ London: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Zifonun, G., Hoffmann, L. & Strecker, B.
    (1997) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache: Band 1. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00055.har
Loading
Locative-based expletives as situation proforms
Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 6, 94 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00055.har
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00055.har
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00055.har
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): correlate; existential; expletive; modifiers; situation proform

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error