1887
Volume 6, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2589-1588
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1596
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The paper investigates the development of the system of non-referential elements in Low German from a cross-Germanic perspective. The data is taken from the currently available reference corpora, which cover the period from the beginning of the attestation in the late 9th century to 1700. The analysis of the corpus data suggests that the equivalents of the neuter pronouns and act as cataphoric elements already in the earliest Low German records, and that they gradually acquire additional non-referential functions, including that of an existential expletive. This contrasts with the assumed situation in the contemporary Low German varieties which, according to traditional descriptions, lack pronominal expletives comparable to German but rather display adverbial expletives, comparable to existential in English and in Dutch. Examining the distributional properties of the pronominal expletive in the history of Low German, the paper observes that this type of expletive is prototypically present in formal written registers and likely remains outside the domain of spoken, colloquial style, which is the focus of the traditional dialectal descriptions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00056.pet
2025-03-06
2025-03-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas
    Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. Wenkerbogen-App. Philipps-University Marburg. https://apps.dsa.info/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Krause, T. ANNIS4
    Krause, T. ANNIS4. Humboldt-University zu Berlin. https://corpus-tools.org/annis/download.html
  3. ReN-Team
    ReN-Team (2021) Reference Corpus Middle Low German/Low Rhenish (1200–1650); Referenzkorpus Mittelniederdeutsch/Niederrheinisch (1200–1650) (Version 1.1) [Data set]. 10.25592/uhhfdm.9195
    https://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.9195 [Google Scholar]
  4. Walkden, G.
    (2015) HeliPaD: the Heliand Parsed Database. Version 0.9. www.chlg.ac.uk/helipad/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zeige, L. E., Schnelle, G., Klotz, M., Donhauser, K., Gippert, J., & Lühr, R.
    (2022) Deutsch Diachron Digital. Referenzkorpus Altdeutsch. Humboldt-University zu Berlin. www.deutschdiachrondigital.de/rea/. 10.34644/laudatio‑dev‑MiXVDnMB7CArCQ9CABmW
    https://doi.org/10.34644/laudatio-dev-MiXVDnMB7CArCQ9CABmW [Google Scholar]
  6. Axel, K.
    (2007) Studies in Old High German Syntax. Left Sentence Periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  7. Axel-Tober, K.
    (2018) Origins of verb-second in Old High German. InA. Jäger, G. Ferraresi & H. Weiß (Eds.), Clause Structure and Word Order in the History of German (pp.22–46). Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bayer, J., & Suchsland, P.
    (1997) Expletiva und leere Subjekte im Deutschen. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 411, 12–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Behaghel, O.
    (1923) Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Vol.11. Die Wortklassen und Wortformen. A. Nomen. Pronomen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernhardt, J.
    (1903) Zur Syntax der gesprochenen Sprache (Ein Versuch). Jahrbuch des Vereins für niederdeutsche Sprachforschung, 291, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Booth, H., Breitbarth, A., Ecay, A., & Farasyn, M.
    (2020) A Penn-Style Treebank of Middle Low German. InN. Calzolari (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020) (pp.766–775). Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Booth, H.
    (2018) Expletives and Clause Structure. Syntactic Change in Icelandic. [PhD-Thesis. The University of Manchester].
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Breivik, L. E.
    (1989) On the causes of syntactic change in English. InL. E. Breivik & E. H. Jahr (Eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Studies of Its Causes (pp.29–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110853063.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853063.29 [Google Scholar]
  14. Breucker, F.
    (1904) Gedichte Brunos von Schonebeck. Jahrbuch des Vereins für niederdeutsche Sprachforschung, 301, 81–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures in Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cognola, F.
    (2023) Free Inversion in Old High German and Cimbrian. On the Status of tho/da as CP Expletives and Their Connection with pro-drop. Journal of Historical Syntax, 7(1), 1–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Elmentaler, M.
    (2015) Dialektaler Wandel in Schleswig-Holstein. Die wechselvolle Geschichte von et und dat. InR. Langhanke (Ed.), Sprache, Literatur, Raum. Festgabe für Willy Diercks (pp.301–351). Bielefeld: Verlang für Regionalgeschichte.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fleischer, J.
    (2011) Historische Syntax des Deutschen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fuß, E., & Hinterhölzl, R.
    (2023) On the Historical Development of Pronouns Referring to Situations: The Rise of Pre-Finite ‘expletives’ in German. Journal of Historical Syntax, 7(2), 1–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gallée, J. H.
    (1993) Altsächsische Grammatik: Mit Berichtigungen und Literaturnachträgen. Nach Wendelin Försters letzter Ausgabe in Auswahl bearbeitet und mit Einleitung und Glossar versehen. Berlin, New York: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110920147
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920147 [Google Scholar]
  22. Grimme, H.
    (1910) Plattdeutsche Mundarten. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111367583
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111367583 [Google Scholar]
  23. Haider, H.
    (2010) The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511845314
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845314 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hartmann, J. M.
    (2008) Expletives in Existentials. English there and German da. [PhD-Thesis. Tilburg University].
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hinterhölzl, R., Petrova, S., & Solf, M.
    (2005) Diskurspragmatische Faktoren für Topikalität und Verbstellung in der althochdeutschen Tatian-Übersetzung (9. Jh.). Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS), 31, 143–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hinterhölzl, R.
    (2024) Giving Content to expletive es in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31. 10.1007/s10828‑023‑09146‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09146-2 [Google Scholar]
  27. Klein, T.
    (2000) Soziokulturelle Voraussetzungen und Sprachraumdes Altniederdeutschen (Altsächsischen). InW. Besch, A. Betten, O. Reichmann & S. Sonderegger (Eds.), Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung (pp.1241–1247). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Krause, T., & Zeldes, A.
    (2016) ANNIS3. A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities311. dsh.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/1/118. 10.1093/llc/fqu057
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu057 [Google Scholar]
  29. Larsson, I.
    (2014) Choice of non-referential subject in existential constructions and with weather-verbs. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) Journal, 11, 55–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lindow, W., Möhn, D., Niebaum, H., Stellmacher, D., Taubken, H. & Wirrer, J.
    (1998) Niederdeutsche Grammatik. Leer: Verlag Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lowell Sluckin, B.
    (2021) Non-canonical subjects and subject positions: locative inversion, V2-violations, and feature inheritance. [Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/24408-1
  32. Mayerthaler, E., & Mayerthaler, W.
    (1990) Aspects of Bavarian Syntax. Or ‘Every Language Has At Least Two Parents’. InJ. Edmondson, A. C. Feagin & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), Development and Diversity. Language Variation across Time and Space. A Festschrift for Charles-James Bailey (pp.371–429). A publication of The Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McCawley, J. D.
    (1998) The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Second edition. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Peters, R.
    (2000) Soziokulturelle Voraussetzungen und Sprachraum des Mittelniederdeutschen. InW. Besch, A. Betten, O. Reichmann & S. Sonderegger (Eds.), Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung (pp.1409–1422). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Petrova, S.
    (2006) A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. InIshihara, S., M. Schmitz, & A. Schwarz (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS)51 (pp.155–182). Potsdam University.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2012) Multiple XP-fronting in Middle Low German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 15(2), 157–188. 10.1007/s10828‑012‑9050‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9050-y [Google Scholar]
  37. Pütz, H.
    (1986) Über die Syntax der Pronominalform es im modernen Deutsch. 2nd ed.Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Richey, M.
    (1755) Idioticon Hambrugense oder Wörter-Buch zur Erklärung der eigenen, in und üm Hamburg gebräuchlichen Nieder-Sächsischen Mund-Art. Hamburg: Conrad König.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sasse, H.-J.
    (1987) The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Lingistics, 251, 511–580. 10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schrodt, R.
    (2004) Althochdeutsche Grammatik II: Syntax. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110930870
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110930870 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schwabe, K.
    (2016) Sentential proforms and argument conditionals. InW. Frey, A. Meinunger & K. Schwabe (Eds.), Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms: Syntactic Properties and Interpretative Effects (pp.211–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.232.08sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.232.08sch [Google Scholar]
  43. Sievers, E.
    (1878) Heliand. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sudhoff, S.
    (2003) Argumentsätze und es-Korrelate. Zur syntaktischen Struktur von Nebensatzeinbettungen im Deutschen. Berlin: WVB.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Thies, H.
    (2021) Plattdeutsche Grammatik. Formen und Funktionen. Fourth edition. verlag.marless.de
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Vikner, S.
    (1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wallmeier, N.
    (2012) Uneingeleitete Nebensätze mit konditionaler Semantik im Mittelniederdeutschen. InR. Langhanke, K. Berg, M. Elmentaler & J. Peters (Eds.) Niederdeutsche Syntax (pp.32–55). Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Weiß, H.
    (1998) Syntax des Bairischen: Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110912487
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110912487 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00056.pet
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00056.pet
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): correlates; expletives; Germanic; Low German; quasi-arguments
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error