1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The middle-field restriction of Germanic modal particles
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

Modal particles are often considered a distinctive feature of Germanic languages with V2 word order and are typically confined to the middle field. Previous research has largely addressed their semantic and pragmatic development, usually within individual languages. This squib shifts the focus to syntax, offering a comparative Germanic perspective on the emergence and structural behavior of modal particles and examining their interaction with the V2 property.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00060.con
2025-12-16
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/elt.00060.con
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/elt.00060.con/elt.00060.con.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00060.con&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Jóhannesson, J.
    (1950) Austfirðinga sǫgur. Reykjavík: Íslenzk fornrit.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Nordal, S., & Jónsson, G.
    (1938) Borgfirðinga sǫgur. Reykjavík: Íslenzk fornrit.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Abraham, W.
    (1986) Die Bedeutungsgenese von Modalpartikeln. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. (1991a) The grammaticization of the German modal particles. InE. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.17abr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.17abr [Google Scholar]
  5. (1991b) Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about?InW. Abraham (Ed.), Discourse particles (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.12.08abr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.12.08abr [Google Scholar]
  6. Aijmer, K.
    (2009) Does English have modal particles?InA. Renouf & A. Kehoe (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments (pp.–). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789042025981_008
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042025981_008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Autenrieth, T.
    (2002) Heterosemie und Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpartikeln: Eine synchrone und diachrone Studie anhand von »eben«, »halt«, »e(cher)t«, »einfach«, »schlicht« und »glatt«. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110960907
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110960907 [Google Scholar]
  8. Axel, K.
    (2007) Studies on Old High German syntax. Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.112
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  9. Axel-Tober, K.
    (2016) Satzadverbiale im Deutschen: synchrone und diachrone Fragen bei einem ‚scheints‘ alten Thema. InS. Neri, R. Schuhmann & S. Zeilfelder (Eds.), “dat ih dir it nu bi huldi gibu” — Linguistische, germanistische und indogermanistische Studien Rosemarie Lühr gewidmet (pp.–). Wiesbaden: Reichert.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Axel-Tober, K., Coniglio, M., Müller, K., & Paul, K.
    (2025) Grammaticalization of sentence adverbs and modal particles revisited. InH. Kennard, E. Lindsay-Smith, A. Lahiri & M. Maiden (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 2022 (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.369.15axe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.369.15axe [Google Scholar]
  11. Axel-Tober, K., & Müller, K.
    (2017) Evidential adverbs in German. Diachronic development and present-day meaning. Journal of Historical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/jhl.7.1‑2.02axe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.02axe [Google Scholar]
  12. Bayer, J.
    (2012) From Modal Particle to Interrogative Marker: A study of German denn. InL. Brugé, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro & C. Poletto (Eds.), Functional Heads, Volume 7: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Braune, W.
    (2004) Gotische Grammatik. Mit Lesestücken und Wörterverzeichnis. 20. Auflage. Neu bearbeitet von Frank Heidermanns. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110945089
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945089 [Google Scholar]
  14. Braunmüller, K.
    (1991) Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Tübingen: UTB.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Burkhardt, A.
    (1994) Abtönungspartikeln im Deutschen. Bedeutung und Genese. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, , –. 10.1515/zfgl.1994.22.2.129
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1994.22.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  16. Buzzoni, M.
    (2009) “Ibai mag blindana tiuhan?” (Luke, 6.39): Pragmatic functions and syntactic strategies in the Gothic left sentence periphery. Filologia Germanica, . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cardinaletti, A.
    (2007) Für eine syntaktische Analyse von Modalpartikeln. InE. -M. Thune & F. Ortu (Eds.), Gesprochene Sprache — Partikeln (pp.–). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2011) German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review, (), –. 10.1515/tlir.2011.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cinque, G.
    (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cognola, F., & Moroni, M. C.
    (2022) Le particelle modali del tedesco. Caratteristiche formali, proprietà pragmatiche ed equivalenti funzionali in italiano. Roma: Carocci.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Coniglio, M.
    (2005) Deutsche Modalpartikeln: eine syntaktische Analyse. Diplomarbeit, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2008) Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2011) Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 10.1524/9783050053578
     https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050053578 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2022) On the adverbial origin of German modal particles. InX. Artiagoitia, A. Elordieta & S. Monforte (Eds.), Discourse particles (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.276.01con
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.276.01con [Google Scholar]
  25. (to appeara). Ways of grammaticalizing modal particles: a German-Italian comparative perspective. InF. Cognola & M. Coniglio Eds. Ways of expressing modality. German modal particles from a comparative perspective (Linguistik Online). Ms.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (to appearb). Modal particles. InR. Gergel & A. van Kemenade Eds. The Grammatical History of the Germanic Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Coniglio, M., Paul, K., & Steinbach, M.
    (2023) Why artichokes and palms don’t grow on trees — the grammaticalization of question particles from a co-speech gesture in sign language. InN. Pomino, E. -M. Remberger & J. Zwink (Eds.), From formal linguistic theory to the art of historical editions: The multifaceted dimensions of Romance linguistics (pp.–). Vienna: Vienna University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Coniglio, M., & Zegrean, I.
    (2012) Splitting up force. Evidence from discourse particles. InL. Aelbrecht, L. Haegeman & R. Nye (Eds.), Main Clause Phenomena. New Horizons (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.190.10con
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.10con [Google Scholar]
  29. De Vries, J.
    (1977) Altnordisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Zweite verbesserte Auflage. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Diderichsen, P.
    (1962) Elementær Dansk Grammatik. Kopenhagen: Gyldendal.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Diewald, G.
    (1997) Grammatikalisierung. Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110946673
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110946673 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2011) Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.2011.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dunkel, G. E.
    (2014) Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Vol.. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Erdmann, O. H. T.
    (1874) Untersuchungen über die Syntax der Sprache Otfrids. Vol.. Halle: Waisenhauses.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Favaro, M.
    (2023) Modal particles in Italian: Adverbs of illocutionary modification and sociolinguistic variation. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.15460/repohh/sub.2024200002
     https://doi.org/10.15460/repohh/sub.2024200002 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ferraresi, G.
    (2005) Word Order and Phrase Structure in Gothic. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fischer, K., & Heide, M.
    (2018) Inferential Processes in English and the Question whether English has Modal Particles. Open Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0025
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0025 [Google Scholar]
  38. Foolen, A.
    (1993) De betekenis van partikels: Een dokumentatie van de stand van het onderzoek, met bijzondere aandacht voor MAAR. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Frey, W.
    (2004) The grammar-pragmatics interface and the German prefield. Sprache und Pragmatik, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Frey, W., & Pittner, K.
    (1998) Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Grimm, J.
    (1967 [1890]) Deutsche Grammatik. Vol.. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hentschel, E.
    (1986) Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln. „Ja“, „doch“, „halt“ und „eben“. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111371221
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111371221 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hirt, H.
    (1934) Handbuch des Urgermanischen. Teil 3: Abriss der Syntax. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hopper, P. J.
    (1975) The Syntax of the Simple Sentence in Proto-Germanic. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110879087
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879087 [Google Scholar]
  45. Klein, J. S.
    (1994) Gothic þaruh, þanuh and -(u)h þan. Indogermanische Forschungen, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. König, E., Stark, D., & Requardt, S.
    (1990) Adverbien und Partikeln: ein deutsch-englisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Longobardi, G.
    (1994) La posizione del verbo gotico e la sintassi comparata dei complementatori germanici: alcune riflessioni preliminari. InP. Cipriano, P. Di Giovine & M. Mancini (Eds.), Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi (pp.–). Rome: Il Calamo.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Meibauer, J.
    (1994) Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111339795
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111339795 [Google Scholar]
  49. Miller, D. G.
    (2019) The Oxford Gothic Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198813590.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813590.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Molnár, A.
    (2002) Die Grammatikalisierung deutscher Modalpartikeln. Fallstudien. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller, K.
    (2019) Sentence adverbials, (non-)at-issueness, and orientation in German. InD. Gutzmann & K. Turgay (Eds.), Secondary Content (pp.–). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004393127_013
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393127_013 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2021) Satzadverbien und Evidentialität (studia grammatica 87). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110751956
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751956 [Google Scholar]
  53. Opalka, H.
    (1979) Untersuchung zu redekonstituierenden Funktionen der Modalpartikel “ja”. Papiere zur Textlinguistik. Hamburg: Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ormelius-Sandblom, E.
    (1997) Die Modalpartikeln „ja“, „doch“ und „schon“. Zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Lund: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Petrova, S.
    (2017) On the status and the interpretation of the left-peripheral sentence particles inu and ia in Old High German. InJ. Bayer & V. Struckmeier (Eds.), Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Remberger, E. -M.
    (2021) Discourse and Pragmatic Markers in the Romance Languages. InM. Loporcaro & F. Gardani (Eds.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics. Oxford University Press. Advance online publication. [linguistics.oxfordre.com/]. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.675
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.675 [Google Scholar]
  57. Roberts, I.
    (1996) Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V2. InE. Brandner & G. Ferraresi (Eds.), Language Change and Generative Grammar (pp.–). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑90776‑9_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90776-9_6 [Google Scholar]
  58. Roberts, I., & Roussou, A.
    (2003) Syntactic change. A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  59. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse markers.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  60. Thurmair, M.
    (1989) Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Linguistische Arbeiten, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Van Gelderen, E.
    (2001) The syntax of mood particles in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica, , –. 10.1515/flih.2001.22.1‑2.301
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2001.22.1-2.301 [Google Scholar]
  62. Van Kemenade, A.
    (1987) Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110882308
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882308 [Google Scholar]
  63. (2022) Chapter 6. Syntactic change and pragmatic maintenance: The discourse particle then over the history of English. InR. Gergel, I. Reich & A. Speyer (Eds.), Particles in German, Englisch and Beyond (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.224.06but
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.224.06but [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Kemenade, A., & Links, M.
    (2020) Discourse particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse management. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, ().
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Vismans, R.
    (1994) Modal particles in Dutch directives: A study in functional grammar.Amsterdam: IFOTT.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Waltereit, R.
    (2006) Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110948295
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110948295 [Google Scholar]
  67. Waltereit, R., & Detges, U.
    (2007) Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, , –. 10.5565/rev/catjl.124
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.124 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wauchope, M. M.
    (1991) The grammar of the Old High German modal particles thoh, ia and thanne. New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Wegener, H.
    (2002) The evolution of the German modal particle denn. InI. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.24weg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.24weg [Google Scholar]
  70. Weiß, H.
    (2005a) The double competence hypothesis. On diachronic evidence. InS. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197549.557
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.557 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2005b) Von den vier Lebensaltern einer Standardsprache. Zur Rolle von Spracherwerb und Medialität. Deutsche Sprache, (), –. 10.37307/j.1868‑775X.2005.04.02
     https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2005.04.02 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2013) Satztyp und Dialekt. InJ. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110224832.764
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110224832.764 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2019) Rebracketing (Gliederungsverschiebung) and the Early Merge Principle. Diachronica, (), –. 10.1075/dia.00015.wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.00015.wei [Google Scholar]
  74. (2021) Reanalysis involving Rebracketing and Relabeling — a special type. InU. Detges, R. Waltereit, E. Winter-Froemel & A. C. Wolfsgruber (Eds.), Whither Reanalysis. Journal of Historical Syntax, article, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Weydt, H.
    (1979) Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110863574
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863574 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00060.con
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: grammaticalization ; middle-field ; syntax ; Germanic modal particles ; Abraham’s paradox

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error