1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Transitioning developmental paths in modal flavors
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates the cognitive plausibility of diachronic modal development using an experimental approach grounded in the which has been proposed and shown to successfully simulate the conditions under which an attested semantic change occurs (Gergel, 2020; Gergel et al. 2021). Building on historical claims that modal meanings evolve along a unidirectional path — from dynamic to deontic to epistemic meaning — we designed acceptability judgment experiments to test whether speakers accommodate hypothetical shifts in modal usage. Experiment 1 employed constructed stimuli, and Experiment 2 used naturally occurring sentences from the Corpus of Contemporary American English, testing three English modal expressions () across dynamic, deontic, and epistemic contexts. Results largely align with historical predictions (but there is also a notable exception that we discuss in more detail): is acceptable in dynamic and deontic contexts but not epistemic; remains strongly deontic and resists epistemic reinterpretation; is highly acceptable in epistemic contexts and degraded elsewhere. A third experiment examined whether possibility adverbials facilitate the deontic-to-epistemic shift, revealing an interaction effect that reduces markedness in epistemic contexts. These findings support the experimental replication of diachronic tendencies while highlighting constraints on semantic change and the potential role of bridging elements. We conclude that experimental paradigms can illuminate mechanisms underlying language change and propose directions for future research integrating syntactic factors and contextual triggers.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00065.erb
2026-03-26
2026-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/elt.00065.erb
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bablli, Mohammad, and Remus Gergel
    2025 Towards reproducing semantic change: an iterative in Syrian Arabic. A Festschrift in Honour of Regine Eckardt, –. 10.18452/33373
     https://doi.org/10.18452/33373 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, G., T. Wikle, J. Tillery and L. Sand
    1991 The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change: –. 10.1017/S0954394500000569
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000569 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, D. and M. Maechler
    2009 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes. r package version 0.999375–31. available atcran.r-project.org/package_lme4
  4. Bochnak, M. Ryan, and Lisa Matthewson
    2020 Techniques in complex semantic fieldwork. Annual Review of Linguistics: –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011619‑030452
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030452 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L., and William Pagliuca
    1985 Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. Historical semantics, historical word formation, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
    1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chierchia, Gennaro and McConnel-Ginet, Sally
    2000 Meaning and Grammar. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cournane, Ailís
    2019 A developmental view on incrementation in language change. Theoretical Linguistics: –. 10.1515/tl‑2019‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Culbertson, Jennifer and Kathryn Schuler
    2019 Artificial language learning in children. Annual Review of linguistics: –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑012329
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012329 [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, Mark
    2008 The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
  12. Diewald, Gabriele & Ferraresi, Gisella
    2008 Semantic, syntactic and constructional restrictions in the diachronic rise of modal particles in German: A corpus-based study on the formation of a grammaticalization channel. InTheoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, Seoane, Elena & María José López-Couso (eds), –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.06die
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.06die [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckardt, Regine
    2006 Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eide, K. M. & R. Gergel
    . in prog.Germanic modal trajectories: meaning and structure. Ms. NTNU & Saarland University.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Erbach, Kurt and Remus Gergel
    2025 Testing dialects with simulations: the status of pseudo-partitives in US English. Linguistica Brunensia (): –. 10.5817/LB2025‑38532
     https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2025-38532 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fedzechkina, Masha & Gareth Roberts
    2020 Learners sacrifice robust communication as a result of a social bias. 10.31219/osf.io/usfhz
     https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/usfhz [Google Scholar]
  17. Fritz, Gerd
    1997 Historische Semantik der Modalverben. InUntersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen, Fritz, Gerd and Thomas Gloning (eds.), –. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuchs, Martín, Ashwini Deo & María Mercedes Piñango
    2020 The Progressive-to-Imperfective shift. Contextually determined variation in Rioplatense, Iberian, and Mexican Altiplano Spanish. InAlfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow and Cristina Sanz (eds.), Hispanic Linguistics: Current issues and new directions, –. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.26.06fuc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.26.06fuc [Google Scholar]
  19. Gergel, Remus
    2003 Modal syntax: Detecting its parameters with VP-ellipsis. SKY Journal of Linguistics: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2009 Modality and Ellipsis: Diachronic and Synchronic Evidence. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213362
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213362 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2017 Dimensions of variation in Old English modals. InM. L. Rivero, A. Arregui, A. Salanova, (eds.), Modality across Syntactic Categories, –. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 2020 Sich ausgehen: Actuality entailments and further notes from the perspective of an Austrian German motion verb construction. Linguistic Society of America, (). –. 10.3765/plsa.v5i2.4790
     https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i2.4790 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gergel, Remus and Martin Kopf-Giammanco
    2021 ‘Sich ausgehen’: On modalizing go constructions in Austrian German. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique: –. 10.1017/cnj.2021.10
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2021.10 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gergel, Remus, Martin Kopf-Giammanco, and Maike Puhl
    2021 Simulating semantic change: a methodological note. Experiments in Linguistic Meaning, –. 10.3765/elm.1.4869
     https://doi.org/10.3765/elm.1.4869 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gergel, Remus, Maike Puhl, Simon Dampfhofer, and Edgar Onea
    2023 The rise and particularly fall of presuppositions: Evidence from duality in universals. Experiments in Linguistic Meaning, , –. 10.3765/elm.2.5329
     https://doi.org/10.3765/elm.2.5329 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gleitman, Lila, Kimberly Cassidy, Rebecca Nappa, Anna Papafragou, and John Trueswell
    2005 Hard words. Language Learning and Development, –. 10.1207/s15473341lld0101_4
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473341lld0101_4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goodall, Grant
    2023 Constructed Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑030421‑064707
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030421-064707 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goossens, Louis
    1982 On the development of the modals and the epistemic function in English. InPapers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed.Anders Ahlqvist, –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.21.12goo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.21.12goo [Google Scholar]
  29. Kirby, Simon, Hannah Cornish, and Kenny Smith
    2008 Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. PNAS (), –. 10.1073/pnas.0707835105
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kopf-Giammanco, Martin
    2025 High presuppositions in change. Doctoral dissertation, Saarland University.
  31. Kratzer, Angelika
    2012 Modals and Conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lightfoot, David
    1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lühr, Rosemarie
    1997 Zur Semantik der althochdeutschen Modalverben. InUntersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen, Fritz, Gerd & Gloning, Thomas (eds.): pp.–. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110940848.159
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110940848.159 [Google Scholar]
  34. Myers, James
    2017 Acceptability judgments. InOxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.333
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.333 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nuyts, Jan, Wim Caers & Henri-Joseph Goelenk
    2021 System and variation in the Dutch modals. InCognitive Sociolinguistics Revisited, eds.Kristiansen, G., Franco, K., De Pascale, S., Rosseel, L., & Zhang, W., pp.–. DeGruyter. 10.1515/9783110733945‑020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733945-020 [Google Scholar]
  36. Palmer, F. R.
    1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Repp, Sophie
    2013 Common ground management: Modal Particles, Illocutionary Negation, and VERUM. InDaniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gartner (eds.), Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning, –. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. 10.1163/9789004183988_008
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004183988_008 [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, Ian G.
    1993 Verbs and Diachronic syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Roberts, Ian G., and Anna Roussou
    2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberts, Gareth and Betsy Snelle
    2020 Empirical foundations for an integrated study of language evolution. Language Dynamics and Change, –. 10.1163/22105832‑bja10001
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-bja10001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, Gareth and Maryia Fedzechkina
    2018 Social biases modulate the loss of redundant forms in the cultural evolution of language. Cognition, –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rullmann, Hotze, Lisa Matthewson, and Henry Davis
    2008 “Modals as Distributive Indefinites.” Natural Language Semantics:–. 10.1007/s11050‑008‑9036‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9036-0 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shepherd, Susan
    1982 From deontic to epistemic: An analysis of modals in the history of English, creoles, and language acquisition. Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed.Anders Ahlqvist, –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.21.36she
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.21.36she [Google Scholar]
  45. Sweetser, Eve
    1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  46. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language: –. 10.2307/414841
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  47. 1997 Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: The case of promise and threaten. In: T. Swan & O. Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, –. 10.1515/9783110889932.185
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.185 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2006 The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. Invan Kemenade, A. and Los, B., ed., The Handbook of the History of English, –. Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757048.ch14
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  49. Warner, Anthony R.
    1993 English Auxiliaries: Structure and History: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511752995
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752995 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zehr, J. and F. Schwarz
    (2018) Penncontroller for internet based experiments (ibex).
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, Muye, Maria Mercedes Piñango & Ashwini Deo
    2018 Real-time roots of meaning change: Electrophysiology reveals the contextual-modulation processing basis of synchronic variation in the location possession domain. 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00065.erb
Loading
Transitioning developmental paths in modal flavors
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00065.erb
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00065.erb
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00065.erb
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: experimental semantics ; acceptability judgment task ; diachrony ; modality

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error