1887
image of Perspectival mechanisms of modality
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In recent years, it has been shown that perspectivization is not a pragmatic add-on but central to human cognition and linguistic conceptualization (see e.g. MacWhinney 2005, Verhagen 2023). One linguistic aspect where this is particularly obvious is modality as the semantic domain whose core function is commonly seen in denoting speakers’ attitudes towards a proposition, and as such, dependent on viewpoint (e.g. Bybee & Fleischman 1995, Papafragou 2002, 2006, Abraham & Leiss 2012, Abraham 2020). In this paper, we want to support this view by showing that the viewpoint constellation is a central semantic component which is responsible for the (synchronic as well as diachronic) shifts between different readings of German modal verbs. With this aim in mind, the paper brings together previous formal semantic and functional cognitive approaches and offers a unified analysis of the perspectival mechanism that allows for various semantic readings of modal verbs. We will show this exemplarily for one particular modal verb in German, i.e. (‘shall’) + inf. Based on historical empirical evidence, we will work out a unified analysis of the viewpoint constellation which is able (i) to unify root, epistemic and evidential readings, (ii) to describe the semantic development, and (iii) to explain the complementary distribution to the imperative. By doing so, our aim is to shed light on fundamental processes of perspectivization in modal verbs and their status in linguistic theory.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00066.hin
2026-04-03
2026-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, Werner
    (2020) Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139108676
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139108676 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
    (2008) Introduction: Aspect-modality interfaces and interchanges across languages. InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Modality–Aspect Interfaces. Implications and typological solutions (pp.–). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.79.03abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.79.03abr [Google Scholar]
  3. (2012) Introduction: Theory of mind elements across languages. Traces of Bühler’s legacy in modern linguistics. InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages (pp.–). Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110271072.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271072.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    (2003) Evidentiality in typological perspective. InAlexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp.–). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.04aik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.04aik [Google Scholar]
  5. Arregui, Ana, Rivero, María Luisa, & Salanova, Andrés
    (2017) Introduction. InAna Arregui, María Luisa Rivero, & Andrés Salanova (Eds.), Modality across syntactic categories (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bech, Gunnar
    (1951) Grundzüge der semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der hochdeutschen Modalverba. København: Munsgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bochnak, Ryan M. & Csipak, Eva
    (2018) Reportative deontic modality in English and German. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Braun, Christian & Scherr, Elisabeth
    (2021) Verschriftlichte Modalität. Epistemische Interpretationsvarianten althochdeutscher Modalverben in ausgewählten Quellen. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte, (), –. 10.1515/jbgsg‑2021‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jbgsg-2021-0015 [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, Christian, Pfeifer, Philip, & Scherr, Elisabeth
    (2024) Zur historischen Epistemik der Modalverben. Eine kontrastive Studie zu magan und sculan bei Otfrid und im althochdeutschen Tatian. InClaudia Wich-Reif & Delphine Pasques (Eds.), Produzenten- und rezipientenorientierte Syntax und Semantik in Texten des 8.-18. Jahrhunderts. Akten des Internationalen Forschungsateliers zur Geschichte der deutschen und französischen Syntax an der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelm-Universität Bonn, 24.-26. Juli 2021 (pp.–). Berlin: Weidler.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan L. & Fleischman, Suzanne
    (1995) Modality in Grammar and Discourse. An Introductory Essay. InJoan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (Eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse (pp.–). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.01int [Google Scholar]
  11. Concu, Valentina
    (2024) “Ih gebiude dir, wurm!” Directives in Old Saxon and Old High German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/jhp.20012.con
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.20012.con [Google Scholar]
  12. Condoravdi, Cle & Lauer, Sven
    (2012) Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, , –. URL: www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss9/ (07.03.2026).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Curme, George O.
    (1922) A grammar of the German language. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. de Haan, Ferdinand
    (2001) The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Diewald, Gabriele
    (1999) Die Modalverben im Deutschen: Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110945942
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945942 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fritz, Gerd
    (1991) Deutsche Modalverben 1609: Epistemische Verwendungsweisen. Ein Beitrag zur Bedeutungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, , –. 10.1515/bgsl.1991.1991.113.28
    https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl.1991.1991.113.28 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1997) Historische Semantik der Modalverben. Problemskizze — Exemplarische Analyse — Forschungsüberblick. InGerd Fritz & Thomas Gloning (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen (pp.–). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Glas, Reinhold
    (1984) ‘sollen’ im heutigen Deutsch. Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gloning, Thomas
    (2001) Gebrauchsweisen von Modalverben und Texttraditionen. InReimar Müller & Marga Reis (Eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen (pp.–). Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hacquard, Valentine & Wellwood, Alexis
    (2012) Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study. Semantics and Pragmatics, , –. 10.3765/sp.5.4
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, Michal
    (1970) Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of language, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Haßler, Gerda
    (2010) Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis. InGabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages (pp.–). Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110223972.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.223 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hinterwimmer, Stefan
    (2013) The semantics of German sollen. Semantics-Pragmatics-Interfaces, International Congress of Linguistics, University of Geneva, Session 6, July 2026.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hinterwimmer, Stefan, Matthewson, Lisa, & Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    (2019) Competition between the German root modal sollen and the imperative. InM. Teresa Espinal, Elena Castroviejo, Manuel Leonetti, & Louise McNally (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB), , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jary, Mark & Kissine, Mikhail
    (2016) Imperatives as (non-)modals. InJoanna Balszczak, Anastasia Giannakidou, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska, & Krzysztof Migdalski (Eds.), Mood, Aspect, Modality Revisited. New Answers to Old questions (pp.–). Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226363660.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226363660.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaplan, David
    (1989) Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. InJoseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiefer, Ferenc
    (1987) On defining modality. Folia Linguistica, (), –. 10.1515/flin.1987.21.1.67
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1987.21.1.67 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kotin, Michail
    (2024) Evidentialität in autochthonen altgermanischen Schriftdenkmälern im Vergleich zur deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, (), –. 10.1515/bgsl‑2024‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2024-0002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Krause, Maxi
    (1997) Modalisierung bei Otfrid. InYvon Desportes (Ed.), Semantik der syntaktischen Beziehungen. Akten des Pariser Kolloquiums zur Erforschung des Althochdeutschen 1994 (pp.–). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Leiss, Elisabeth
    (2008) The silent and aspect-driven patterns of deonticity and epistemicity: A chapter in diachronic typology. InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Modality-Aspect Interfaces. Implications and typological solutions (pp.–). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2009) Drei Spielarten der Epistemizität, drei Spielarten der Evidentialität und drei Spielarten des Wissens. InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus (pp.–). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2012) Epistemicity, Evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages (pp.–). Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110271072.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271072.39 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lühr, Rosemarie
    (1997) Zur Semantik der althochdeutschen Modalverben. InGerd Fritz & Thomas Gloning (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen (pp.–). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110940848.159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110940848.159 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lyons, John
    (1977) Semantics. Volume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Maché, Jakob
    (2009) Das Wesen epistemischer Modalität. InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus (pp.–). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2019) How Epistemic Modifiers Emerge. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110411027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110411027 [Google Scholar]
  37. MacWhinney, Brian
    (2005) The emergence of grammar from perspective. InDiane Pecher & Rolf A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.009 [Google Scholar]
  38. Matthewson, Lisa
    (2015) Evidential restrictions on epistemic modals. InLuis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menendez-Benito (Eds.), Epistemic Indefinites (pp. –). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Müller, Reimar
    (2001) Modalverben, Infinitheit und Negation im Prosa-Lancelot. InReimar Müller & Marga Reis (Eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen (pp.–). Hamburg: Buske [Linguistische Berichte: Sonderheft, 9].
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Murray, Sarah E.
    (2021) Evidentiality, Modality, and Speech Acts. Annual review of linguistics, , –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑012625
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012625 [Google Scholar]
  41. Narrog, Heiko
    (2005) On defining modality again. Language Sciences, , –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2009) Modality in Japanese. The layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  43. Palmer, Frank R.
    (2001) Mood and Modality. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2003) Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive, and typological issues. InRoberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug, & Frank R. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in Contemporary English (pp.–). Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895339.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339.1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Papafragou, Anna
    (2002) Modality and theory of mind. Perspectives from language development and autism. InSjef Barbiers, Frits Beukeman, & Wim van der Wurff (Eds.), Modality and its interaction with the verbal system (pp.–). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.47.10pap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.47.10pap [Google Scholar]
  46. (2006) Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua, , –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  47. Paul, Hermann
    (2007) Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. . Auflage, neu bearbeitet vonThomas Klein, Hans-Joachim Somls und Klaus-Peter Wegera. Mit einer Syntax von Ingeborg Schöbler, neubearbeitet und erweitert von Heinz-Peter Prell. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pfeifer, Philipp
    (2021) Waz skel iz sin? Typologie der Verwendungsweisen des Verbes sculan im althochdeutschen Tatian und bei Otfrid. M. A. thesis, University of Graz. URL: https://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/content/titleinfo/6321854/full.pdf (07.03.2026).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2023) Versuch einer Typologie der Verwendungsweisen von ahd. Modalverben am Beispiel des Verbes sculan. InChristian Braun & Elisabeth Scherr (Eds.), Methoden zur Erforschung grammatischer Strukturen in historischen Quellen: Vom Einzelfall zum System (pp.–). Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110784282‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110784282-007 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pietrandrea, Paola
    (2005) Epistemic Modality: Functional Properties and the Italian System. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.74
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.74 [Google Scholar]
  51. Portner, Paul
    (2007) Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics, , –. 10.1007/s11050‑007‑9022‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9022-y [Google Scholar]
  52. (2009) Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Scherr, Elisabeth
    (2013) Da mac niht gutes von geschehen […]. Deixis im Sprachwandelprozess der Modalverben. InJahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte, , –. 10.1515/jbgsg‑2013‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jbgsg-2013-0013 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2019) Die Opazität epistemischer Modalverben im Deutschen: Funktion, Form und empirische Fassbarkeit. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110620382
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110620382 [Google Scholar]
  55. Schmid, Hans Ulrich
    (2023) Althochdeutsche Grammatik II. Grundzüge einer deskriptiven Syntax. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110782493
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110782493 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schrodt, Richard
    (2004) Althochdeutsche Grammatik II. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110930870
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110930870 [Google Scholar]
  57. Searle, John R.
    (1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. InKeith Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge, –. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Stalnaker, Robert
    (1978) Assertions. InPeter Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp.–). New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368873_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_013 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2002) Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, (), –. 10.1023/A:1020867916902
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
  60. Schwager, Magdalena
    (2006) Interpreting Imperatives. PhD thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a. M.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    (1989) On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language, (), –. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  62. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
    (2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Verhagen, Arie
    (2023) The origins of perspective taking lie in iconic language use: Unifying theories of signs, conversation, and narrative perspective. Frontiers in Communication, , . 10.3389/fcomm.2023.623662 (07.03.2026).
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.623662 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zeman, Sonja
    (2013) Zur Diachronie der Modalverben: sollen zwischen Temporalität, Modalität und Evidentialität. InWerner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (Eds.), Funktionen von Modalität (pp.–). Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110333091.335
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110333091.335 [Google Scholar]
  65. (2019) The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions. Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/prag.18051.zem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18051.zem [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00066.hin
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00066.hin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: epistemicity ; perspectivization ; modality ; evidentiality ; imperative
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error