1887
image of The nature of modality

There is no abstract available.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00067.bid
2026-04-03
2026-04-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/elt.00067.bid/elt.00067.bid.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00067.bid&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abraham, Werner
    (1986): Die Bedeutungsgenese von Modalpartikeln. Die bedeutungskonstituierenden Variablen: Kontrastdomäne und Kontext. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1990): Die Grammatikalisierung von Auxiliar- und Modalverben. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, –. 10.1515/bgsl.1990.1990.112.200
    https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl.1990.1990.112.200 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1991a): Modalverben in Germania. In: E. Iwasaki (ed.), Begegnung mit dem Fremden: Grenzen — Traditionen — Vergleiche, Akten des VIII. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, Tokyo (1990). Band 4: Sektion 4: Kontrastive Syntax, — . München: Iudicium.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1991b): The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In: E. Closs Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. II. Types of grammatical markers, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.17abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.17abr [Google Scholar]
  5. (1992): The aspectual source of the epistemic-root distinction of modal verbs in German. In: W. Boeder, Chr. Schroeder, K. H. Wagner and W. Wildgen (eds.), Sprache in Raum und Zeit. In memoriam Johannes Bechert. Band 2: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, –. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1997): The interdependence of case, aspect, and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the genitive. In: A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2005): Event arguments and modal verbs. In: C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein (eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications, –. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110913798.243
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110913798.243 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2006): The compositional nature of the analytic passive: Syntatic vs. event semantic triggers. “Argument hypothesis” vs. Aspect hypothesis”. In: W. Abraham and L. Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.68.28abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.28abr [Google Scholar]
  9. (2009): Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikeln und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter. In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.), Modalität, Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, –. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2011): ‘Traces of Bühler’s Semiotic Legacy in Modern Linguistics’. In: K. Bühler, Theory of Language. The representational function of language. Translated byDonald Fraser Goodwin. Incollaboration with Achim Eschbach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: –. 10.1075/z.164.01abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164.01abr [Google Scholar]
  11. (2012): Illocutionary force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure?In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.), Modality and Theory of mind elements across languages, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110271072.67
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271072.67 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2014): Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials?Studia Linguistica:, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2016a): Pervasive underspecification of diathesis, modality, and structural case coding: the gerund in historical and modern German. Linguistische Berichte: –. 10.46771/2366077500248_2
    https://doi.org/10.46771/2366077500248_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2016b): Was bedeutet Subordination mit V2 im Deutschen und Niederländischen: omdat und want ebenso wie weil und denn?In: K. Feyaerts, G. Brône, S. Schoonjans, G. Stuyckens (eds.), Sprache in Raum und Geschichte, System und Kultur. Festschrift für Luk Draye (Leuvense bijdragen 99–100), –. Leuven: Department of Linguistics of the University of Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2017a): Modal particles and Verum focus — new corollaries. In: C. Fedriani and A. Sansò (eds.), Pragmatic markers, Discourse markers and modal particles. New perspectives, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.186.07abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.186.07abr [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017b): Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In: S. Tanaka, E. Leiss, W. Abraham & Y. Fujinawa (eds.), Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Grammatik, –. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2019): What are the building principles in the evolution of language: Paradigmatics or syntagmatics?Evolutionary Linguistic Theory:, –. 10.1075/elt.00007.abr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00007.abr [Google Scholar]
  18. (2020): Modality in Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139108676
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139108676 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bühler, Karl
    (1934): Sprachteorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
    (2010): The evolution of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Diewald, Gabriele
    (2013): Modus und Modalverben — Kategorisierungsoptionen im grammatischen Kernbereich der Modalität. In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.), Funktionen von Modalität, –. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110333091.77
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110333091.77 [Google Scholar]
  22. Narrog, Heiko
    (2005): On defining modality again. Language Sciences, –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2009): Modality in Japanese. The layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00067.bid
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.00067.bid
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error