1887
image of An attentional-bias account of language emergence
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Why do humans alone develop language? I argue that evolution selected a binding bias, not specialized syntactic machinery: a hyperprior treating addressed, multi-timescale communicative events (infant-directed speech, with eye contact and rhythmic prosody) as reliable evidence. Under active inference, the same precision profile biases both perceptual uptake and vocal convergence; no separate imitation system is required. Human echolocation illustrates the logic: trained blind individuals navigate by self-generated clicks, a complex skill from generic neural systems; complexity doesn’t entail selection. The account explains language’s universality and the combinatorial limits of other vocal learners. Three falsifiable tests: a neonatal preference study, a computational replay varying the gain profile, and a newborn functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) assay. Selection targeted what we notice, not what we compute.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/elt.26001.rey
2026-08-18
2026-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aihara, Ikkyu, Emyo Fujioka & Shizuko Hiryu
    2013 Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the echolocation strategies of bats on the basis of mathematical modelling and laboratory experiments. PLoS ONE(). . 10.1371/journal.pone.0068635
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068635 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnon, Inbal, Liran Carmel, Nicolas Claidière, W. Tecumseh Fitch, Susan Goldin-Meadow, Simon Kirby, Kazuo Okanoya, Limor Raviv, Lucie Wolters & Simon E. Fisher
    2025 What enables human language? A biocultural framework. Science(). eadq8303. 10.1126/science.adq8303
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq8303 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, Elizabeth G., Amanda J. Audesse, Julia A. Palacios, Dean M. Bobo, Ashley E. Webb, Sohini Ramachandran & Brenna M. Henn
    2018 No evidence for recent selection at FOXP2 among diverse human populations. Cell(). –.e15. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.048
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.048 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, C. L.
    1979 Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178133
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumgartner, Courtney Anne Noel
    2025 Adult sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) escorts in the eastern Caribbean modify their coda vocalizations in the presence of a calf compared to when with another adult: An investigation of calf-directed communication. Carleton University MSc thesis. 10.22215/etd/2025‑16492
    https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2025-16492 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beecher, Michael D., Inger M. Beecher & Shari Hahn
    1981 Parent–offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia): II. Development and acoustic basis. Animal Behaviour(). –. 10.1016/S0003‑3472(81)80156‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80156-X [Google Scholar]
  7. Behr, Oliver & Otto von Helversen
    2004 Bat serenades — complex courtship songs of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology(). –. 10.1007/s00265‑004‑0768‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0768-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berwick, Robert C. & Noam Chomsky
    2016Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bérzin, F. & C. R. H. Fortinguerra
    1993 EMG study of the anterior, superior and posterior auricular muscles in man. Annals of Anatomy — Anatomischer Anzeiger(). –. 10.1016/S0940‑9602(11)80182‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(11)80182-2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boë, Louis-Jean, Thomas R. Sawallis, Joël Fagot, Pierre Badin, Guillaume Barbier, Guillaume Captier, Lucie Ménard, Jean-Louis Heim & Jean-Luc Schwartz
    2019 Which way to the dawn of speech?: Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech science. Science Advances(). eaaw3916. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw3916
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3916 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowman, Howard, Marco Filetti, Brad Wyble & Christian Olivers
    2013 Attention is more than prediction precision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences(). –. 10.1017/S0140525X12002324
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002324 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brumm, Henrik & Peter J. B. Slater
    2006 Animals can vary signal amplitude with receiver distance: Evidence from zebra finch song. Animal Behaviour(). –. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.020 [Google Scholar]
  13. Buchler, Edward R.
    1980 The development of flight, foraging, and echolocation in the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology(). –. 10.1007/BF00569202
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569202 [Google Scholar]
  14. Burrows, Anne M.
    2008 The facial expression musculature in primates and its evolutionary significance. BioEssays(). –. 10.1002/bies.20719
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20719 [Google Scholar]
  15. Byrnes, Steven J.
    2026 Intro to Brain-Like-AGI safety. OSF Preprints. 10.31219/osf.io/fe36n_v3
    https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fe36n_v3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Campos, Ana, Rocío Loyola-Navarro, Claudia González & Paul Iverson
    2025 Resting-state electroencephalogram and speech perception in young children with developmental language disorder. Brain Sciences(). . 10.3390/brainsci15030219
    https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030219 [Google Scholar]
  17. Casten, Lucas G., Tanner Koomar, Taylor R. Thomas, Jin-Young Koh, Dabney Hofammann, Savantha Thenuwara, Allison Momany,
    2026 Ancient regulatory evolution shapes individual language abilities in present-day humans. Science Advances(). eaed5260. 10.1126/sciadv.aed5260
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aed5260 [Google Scholar]
  18. Çetinçelik, Melis, Caroline F. Rowland & Tineke M. Snijders
    2023 Ten-month-old infants’ neural tracking of naturalistic speech is not facilitated by the speaker’s eye gaze. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. . 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101297
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101297 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, Yining, Laura E. Matheson & Jon T. Sakata
    2016 Mechanisms underlying the social enhancement of vocal learning in songbirds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1522306113
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522306113 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chomsky, Noam
    1965Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1980Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater
    2015 The language faculty that wasn’t: A usage-based account of natural language recursion. Frontiers in Psychology(). –. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01182 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cinelli, Carlos & Chad Hazlett
    2020 Making sense of sensitivity: Extending omitted variable bias. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B(). –. 10.1111/rssb.12348
    https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12348 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cook, Peter, Andrew Rouse, Margaret Wilson & Colleen Reichmuth
    2013 A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) can keep the beat: Motor entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimuli in a non vocal mimic. Journal of Comparative Psychology(). –. 10.1037/a0032345
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032345 [Google Scholar]
  25. Creemers, Ava & Jeannette C. Schaeffer
    2015 Grammatical and pragmatic properties of the DP in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) and in children with High Functioning Autism (HFA). InLinguistics in the Netherlands 2015, –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/avt.32.02cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.32.02cre [Google Scholar]
  26. Dawkins, Richard
    2024The genetic book of the dead: A Darwinian reverie. New Haven: Yale University Press. 10.12987/9780300281668
    https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300281668 [Google Scholar]
  27. Deacon, Terrence W.
    1997The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. DeCasper, Anthony J. & William P. Fifer
    1980 Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science(). –. 10.1126/science.7375928
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7375928 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dodsworth, C., L. J. Norman & Lore Thaler
    2020 Navigation and perception of spatial layout in virtual echo-acoustic space. Cognition. . 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104185
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104185 [Google Scholar]
  30. Doupe, Allison J. & Patricia K. Kuhl
    1999 Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience(). –. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ellis, Nick C.
    2006 Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics. (). –. 10.1093/applin/aml015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  32. Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences(). –. 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  33. Farroni, Teresa, Mark H. Johnson, Enrica Menon, Luisa Zulian, Dino Faraguna & Gergely Csibra
    2005 Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(). –. 10.1073/pnas.0502205102
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502205102 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fedorenko, Evelina, Idan A. Blank, Matthew Siegelman & Zachary Mineroff
    2020 Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network. Cognition. . 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348 [Google Scholar]
  35. Fee, Michale S. & Jesse H. Goldberg
    2011 A hypothesis for basal ganglia-dependent reinforcement learning in the songbird. Neuroscience. –. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.069
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.069 [Google Scholar]
  36. Feldman, Harriet & Karl J. Friston
    2010 Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. . 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ferry, Alissa L., Susan J. Hespos & Sandra R. Waxman
    2013 Nonhuman primate vocalizations support categorization in very young human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1221166110
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221166110 [Google Scholar]
  38. Fitch, W. Tecumseh
    2010The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511817779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014 Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Physics of Life Reviews(). –. 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Marc D. Hauser & Noam Chomsky
    2005 The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Fitch, W. Tecumseh & David Reby
    2001 The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences(). –. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1704
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1704 [Google Scholar]
  42. Fortin, Madeleine, Patrice Voss, Catherine Lord, Maryse Lassonde, Jens C. Pruessner, Dave Saint-Amour, Constant Rainville & Franco Lepore
    2008 Wayfinding in the blind: Larger hippocampal volume and supranormal spatial navigation. Brain(). –. 10.1093/brain/awn250
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn250 [Google Scholar]
  43. Frank, Michael C.
    2023 Bridging the data gap between children and large language models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences(). –. 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Friederici, Angela D.
    2005 Neurophysiological markers of early language acquisition: From syllables to sentences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences(). –. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2020 Hierarchy processing in human neurobiology: How specific is it?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences(). . 10.1098/rstb.2018.0391
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0391 [Google Scholar]
  46. Frisch, Karl von
    1967The dance language and orientation of bees. (Trans.) Leigh E. Chadwick. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Friston, Karl J., Christopher Thornton & Andy Clark
    2012 Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problem. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00130
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00130 [Google Scholar]
  48. Giraud, Anne-Lise & David Poeppel
    2012 Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience(). –. 10.1038/nn.3063
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3063 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gómez, Juan Carlos
    2026 Ostensive communication in great apes: The evolution of Gricean intent. Mind & Language–. 10.1111/mila.70036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.70036 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gould, Edwin, Norman C. Negus & Alvin Novick
    1964 Evidence for echolocation in shrews. Journal of Experimental Zoology(). –. 10.1002/jez.1401560103
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401560103 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gould, Stephen Jay & Elisabeth S. Vrba
    1982 Exaptation — A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology(). –. 10.1017/S0094837300004310
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300004310 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gould, Stephen J. & Richard C. Lewontin
    1979 The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences(). –. 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hare, Brian, Irene Plyusnina, Natalie Ignacio, Olesya Schepina, Anna Stepika, Richard Wrangham & Lyudmila Trut
    2005 Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology(). –. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch
    2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science(). –. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hernandez, Ryan D., Joanna L. Kelley, Eyal Elyashiv, Shaila C. Melton, Adam Auton, Gerton McVean, 1000 Genomes Project, Guy Sella, Martin Przeworski & Carlos D. Bustamante
    2011 Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution. Science(). –. 10.1126/science.1198878
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198878 [Google Scholar]
  56. Heyes, Cecilia
    2019 Précis of cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. . 10.1017/S0140525X18002145
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18002145 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hutcheon, James M., John A. W. Kirsch & Theodore Garland Jr.
    2002 A comparative analysis of brain size in relation to foraging ecology and phylogeny in the Chiroptera. Brain, Behavior and Evolution(). –. 10.1159/000065938
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000065938 [Google Scholar]
  58. Immelmann, Klaus
    1969 Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. InRobert A. Hinde (ed.), Bird vocalizations, –. Cambridge University Press. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:86502555
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Jackendoff, Ray
    2002Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Janik, Vincent M. & Peter J. B. Slater
    1997 Vocal learning in mammals. Advances in the Study of Behavior. –. 10.1016/S0065‑3454(08)60377‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60377-0 [Google Scholar]
  61. 1998 Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Animal Behaviour(). –. 10.1006/anbe.1998.0881
    https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0881 [Google Scholar]
  62. Johnson, Mark H., Suzanne Dziurawiec, Hadyn Ellis & J. Morton
    1991 Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90045‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6 [Google Scholar]
  63. Jordan, Gabriele, Samir S. Deeb, Jenny M. Bosten & J. D. Mollon
    2010 The dimensionality of color vision in carriers of anomalous trichromacy. Journal of Vision(). . 10.1167/10.8.12
    https://doi.org/10.1167/10.8.12 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kallini, Julie, Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald & Christopher Potts
    2024 Mission: Impossible language models. InLun-Wei Ku, Andre Martins & Vivek Srikumar (eds.), Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), –. Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2024.acl‑long.787
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.787 [Google Scholar]
  65. King, Stephanie L. & Vincent M. Janik
    2013 Bottlenose dolphins can use learned vocal labels to address each other. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1304459110
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304459110 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kirby, Simon, Hannah Cornish & Kenny Smith
    2008 Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(). –. 10.1073/pnas.0707835105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105 [Google Scholar]
  67. Knörnschild, Mirjam, Márton Nagy, Margarita Metz, Frank Mayer & Otto von Helversen
    2010 Complex vocal imitation during ontogeny in a bat. Biology Letters(). –. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0685
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0685 [Google Scholar]
  68. Kolarik, Andrew J., Silvia Cirstea, Shahina Pardhan & Brian C. J. Moore
    2014 A summary of research investigating echolocation abilities of blind and sighted humans. Hearing Research. –. 10.1016/j.heares.2014.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kolodny, Oren & Shimon Edelman
    2018 The evolution of the capacity for language: The ecological context and adaptive value of a process of cognitive hijacking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B(). . 10.1098/rstb.2017.0052
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0052 [Google Scholar]
  70. Kuhl, Patricia K.
    2004 Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience(). –. 10.1038/nrn1533
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kuhl, Patricia K., Feng-Ming Tsao & Huei-Mei Liu
    2003 Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1532872100
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1532872100 [Google Scholar]
  72. Langlieb, Jonah, Nina S. Sachdev, Karol S. Balderrama, Naeem M. Nadaf, Mukund Raj, Evan Murray, James T. Webber,
    2023 The molecular cytoarchitecture of the adult mouse brain. Nature(). –. 10.1038/s41586‑023‑06818‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06818-7 [Google Scholar]
  73. Large, Edward W. & Caroline Palmer
    2002 Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science(). –. 10.1207/s15516709cog2601_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2601_1 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lee, Dan, Seungwook Han, Akarsh Kumar & Pulkit Agrawal
    2026 Training language models via neural cellular automata. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10055
  75. Li, Min, Maya Izumoto, Yide Wang, Yoko Kato, Yoshiko Iwatani, Ikuko Hirata, Yoshifumi Mizuno, Masaya Tachibana, Ikuko Mohri & Kuriko Kagitani-Shimono
    2024 Altered white matter connectivity of ventral language networks in autism spectrum disorder: An automated fiber quantification analysis with multi-site datasets. NeuroImage. . 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120731
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120731 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lieberman, Philip
    2017 Comment on “Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready.” Science Advances(). . 10.1126/sciadv.1700442
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700442 [Google Scholar]
  77. Ludusan, Bogdan, Alejandrina Cristia, Reiko Mazuka & Emmanuel Dupoux
    2022 How much does prosody help word segmentation? A simulation study on infant-directed speech. Cognition. . 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104961
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104961 [Google Scholar]
  78. Marblestone, Adam H., Greg Wayne & Konrad P. Kording
    2016 Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. . 10.3389/fncom.2016.00094
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00094 [Google Scholar]
  79. Milne, Jennifer L., Stephen R. Arnott, Daniel Kish, Melvyn A. Goodale & Lore Thaler
    2015 Parahippocampal cortex is involved in material processing via echoes in blind echolocation experts. Vision Research. –. 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  80. Mountford, Hayley S., Ruth Braden, Dianne F. Newbury & Angela T. Morgan
    2022 The genetic and molecular basis of developmental language disorder: A review. Children(). . 10.3390/children9050586
    https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050586 [Google Scholar]
  81. Nakahara, Fumio & Nobuyuki Miyazaki
    2011 Vocal exchanges of signature whistles in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Ethology(). –. 10.1007/s10164‑010‑0259‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-010-0259-4 [Google Scholar]
  82. Norman, Liam J., Tom Hartley & Lore Thaler
    2024 Changes in primary visual and auditory cortex of blind and sighted adults following 10 weeks of click-based echolocation training. Cerebral Cortex(). bhae239. 10.1093/cercor/bhae239
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae239 [Google Scholar]
  83. Norman, Liam J. & Lore Thaler
    2019 Retinotopic-like maps of spatial sound in primary “visual” cortex of blind human echolocators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences(). . 10.1098/rspb.2019.1910
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1910 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2023 The occipital place area is recruited for echo-acoustically guided navigation in blind human echolocators. Journal of Neuroscience(). –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1402‑22.2023
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1402-22.2023 [Google Scholar]
  85. Nudel, Ron, Rikke Vang Christensen, Nelli Kalnak, Mischa Lundberg, Michael Schwinn, Erik Sørensen, Christina Mikkelsen,
    2024 Developmental language disorder — heritability and genetic correlations with other disorders affecting language. Psychiatry Research. . 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116212
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116212 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ocklenburg, Sebastian, Felix Ströckens & Onur Güntürkün
    2013 Lateralisation of conspecific vocalisation in non-human vertebrates. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition(). –. 10.1080/1357650X.2011.626561
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2011.626561 [Google Scholar]
  87. Parr, Lisa A., L. Murphy, E. Feczko, J. Brooks, M. Collantes & T. R. Heitz
    2016 Experience-dependent changes in the development of face preferences in infant rhesus monkeys. Developmental Psychobiology. –. 10.1002/dev.21434
    https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21434 [Google Scholar]
  88. Patel, Aniruddh D., John R. Iversen, Micah R. Bregman & Iris Schulz
    2009 Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal. Current Biology(). –. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.038
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.038 [Google Scholar]
  89. Pearl, Judea
    2009Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803161
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803161 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pepperberg, Irene Maxine
    1999The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674041998
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041998 [Google Scholar]
  91. Perfors, Andrew, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Terry Regier
    2011 The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  92. Pilgeram, Natalie R., Nicole M. Baran, Aditya Bhise, Matthew T. Davis, Erik N. K. Iverson, Eunice Kim, Sumin Lee, Carlos A. Rodriguez-Saltos & Donna L. Maney
    2023 Oxytocin receptor antagonism during early vocal learning reduces song preference and imitation in zebra finches. Scientific Reports(). . 10.1038/s41598‑023‑33340‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33340-7 [Google Scholar]
  93. Pinker, Steven & Paul Bloom
    1990 Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences(). –. 10.1017/S0140525X00081061
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00081061 [Google Scholar]
  94. Pinker, Steven & Ray Jackendoff
    2005 The faculty of language: What’s special about it?Cognition(). –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  95. Putnam, Hilary
    1980 What is innate and why: Comments on the debate. InMassimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, –. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Rademacher, J., P. Morosan, T. Schormann, A. Schleicher, C. Werner, H.-J. Freund & K. Zilles
    2001 Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. NeuroImage(). –. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0714
    https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0714 [Google Scholar]
  97. Reichmuth, Colleen & Caroline Casey
    2014 Vocal learning in seals, sea lions, and walruses. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. –. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  98. Reynolds, Brett
    2020 What echolocation does and doesn’t mean for language. 10.31234/osf.io/h7qdr
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h7qdr [Google Scholar]
  99. Rombaux, Philippe, Caroline Huart, Anne G. De Volder, Isabel Cuevas, Laurent Renier, Thierry Duprez & Cecile Grandin
    2010 Increased olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function in early blind subjects. NeuroReport(). –. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833fcb8a
    https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833fcb8a [Google Scholar]
  100. Rosenzweig, Mark R., Donald A. Riley & David Krech
    1955 Evidence for echolocation in the rat. Science(). . 10.1126/science.121.3147.600
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.121.3147.600 [Google Scholar]
  101. Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin & Elissa L. Newport
    1996 Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science(). –. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 [Google Scholar]
  102. Schmidt, Richard W.
    1990 The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics. (). –. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  103. Scholz, Barbara C., Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Geoffrey K. Pullum & Ryan Nefdt
    2025 Philosophy of linguistics. InEdward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Summer 2025. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2025/entries/linguistics/
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Scott-Phillips, Thom
    2015Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑31273‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31273-0 [Google Scholar]
  105. 2017 Pragmatics and the aims of language evolution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review(). –. 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1061‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1061-2 [Google Scholar]
  106. Seligman, Martin E. P.
    1970 On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review(). –. 10.1037/h0029790
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029790 [Google Scholar]
  107. Shibasaki, Masahiro & Nobuyuki Kawai
    2009 Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): An evolutionarily predisposed visual system. Journal of Comparative Psychology(). –. 10.1037/a0015095
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015095 [Google Scholar]
  108. Tanaka, Masashi, Fangmiao Sun, Yulong Li & Richard Mooney
    2018 A mesocortical dopamine circuit enables the cultural transmission of vocal behaviour. Nature(). –. 10.1038/s41586‑018‑0636‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0636-7 [Google Scholar]
  109. Telkemeyer, Silke, Sonja Rossi, Stefan P. Koch, Till Nierhaus, Jens Steinbrink, David Poeppel, Hellmuth Obrig & Isabell Wartenburger
    2009 Sensitivity of newborn auditory cortex to the temporal structure of sounds. Journal of Neuroscience(). –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1246‑09.2009
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1246-09.2009 [Google Scholar]
  110. Teng, Santani & David Whitney
    2011 The acuity of echolocation: Spatial resolution in sighted persons compared to the performance of an expert who is blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness(). –. 10.1177/0145482X1110500103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110500103 [Google Scholar]
  111. Terrace, Herbert S.
    1979Nim: A chimpanzee who learned sign language. New York: Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Thaler, Lore
    2013 Echolocation may have real-life advantages for blind people: An analysis of survey data. Frontiers in Physiology. 10.3389/fphys.2013.00098
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00098 [Google Scholar]
  113. Thiessen, Erik D., Emily A. Hill & Jenny R. Saffran
    2005 Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy(). –. 10.1207/s15327078in0701_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0701_5 [Google Scholar]
  114. Thompson, Bill, Simon Kirby & Kenny Smith
    2016 Culture shapes the evolution of cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1523631113
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523631113 [Google Scholar]
  115. Tomasello, Michael
    2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv26070v8
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26070v8 [Google Scholar]
  116. 2026 The evolutionary psychology of the human pointing gesture. Mind & Language–. 10.1111/mila.70030
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.70030 [Google Scholar]
  117. Tooby, John, Leda Cosmides & H. Clark Barrett
    2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions. InPeter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  118. Ullman, Shimon, Daniel Harari & Nimrod Dorfman
    2012 From simple innate biases to complex visual concepts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1207690109
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207690109 [Google Scholar]
  119. Vacas, Julia, Adoración Antolı́, Araceli Sánchez-Raya, Carolina Pérez-Dueñas & Fátima Cuadrado
    2024 Eye-tracking methodology to detect differences in attention to faces between developmental language disorder and autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research(). –. 10.1044/2024_JSLHR‑24‑00109
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00109 [Google Scholar]
  120. van der Aa, Jeroen, Henkjan Honing & Carel ten Cate
    2015 The perception of regularity in an isochronous stimulus in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans. Behavioural Processes. –. 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.018 [Google Scholar]
  121. VanderWeele, Tyler J. & Peng Ding
    2017 Sensitivity analysis in observational research: Introducing the E-value. Annals of Internal Medicine(). –. 10.7326/M16‑2607
    https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2607 [Google Scholar]
  122. Vaswani, Ashish, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser & Illia Polosukhin
    2017 Attention is all you need. InAdvances in neural information processing systems, –. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Vater, Marianne, Jin Meng & Richard C. Fox
    2004 Hearing organ evolution and specialization: Early and later mammals. InGeoffrey A. Manley, Richard R. Fay & Arthur N. Popper (eds.), Evolution of the vertebrate auditory system, –. New York, NY: Springer New York. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑8957‑4_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8957-4_9 [Google Scholar]
  124. Vernes, Sonja C.
    2017 What bats have to say about speech and language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review(). –. 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1060‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1060-3 [Google Scholar]
  125. Volman, Susan F.
    1993 Development of neural selectivity for birdsong during vocal learning. Journal of Neuroscience(). –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13‑11‑04737.1993
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-11-04737.1993 [Google Scholar]
  126. Vouloumanos, Athena, Marc D. Hauser, Janet F. Werker & Alia Martin
    2010 The tuning of human neonates’ preference for speech. Child Development(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2009.01412.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01412.x [Google Scholar]
  127. Vouloumanos, Athena & Janet F. Werker
    2007 Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00549.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00549.x [Google Scholar]
  128. Warstadt, Alex, Aaron Mueller, Leshem Choshen, Ethan Wilcox, Chengxu Zhuang, Juan Ciro, Rafael Mosquera,
    2023 Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on developmentally plausible corpora. InProceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, –. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2023.conll‑babylm.1
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.1 [Google Scholar]
  129. Warstadt, Alex, Alicia Parrish, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mohananey, Wei Peng, Sheng-Fu Wang & Samuel R. Bowman
    2020 BLiMP: The benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for English. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics. –. 10.1162/tacl_a_00321
    https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00321 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wegdell, Franziska, Caroline Fryns, Johanna Schick, Lara Nellissen, Marion Laporte, Martin Surbeck, Maria A. van Noordwijk,
    2025 The evolution of infant-directed communication: Comparing vocal input across all great apes. Science Advances(). 10.1126/sciadv.adt7718
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt7718 [Google Scholar]
  131. Werker, Janet F. & Richard C. Tees
    1984 Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development(). –. 10.1016/S0163‑6383(84)80022‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3 [Google Scholar]
  132. Wilkins, John F., Richard W. Wrangham & W. Tecumseh Fitch
    2014 The “domestication syndrome” in mammals: A unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics. Genetics(). –. 10.1534/genetics.114.165423
    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.165423 [Google Scholar]
  133. Wilkinson, Gerald S.
    2003 Social and vocal complexity in bats. InFrans B. M. de Waal & Peter L. Tyack (eds.), Animal social complexity: Intelligence, culture, and individualized societies, –. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674419131.c24
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674419131.c24 [Google Scholar]
  134. Wohlers, David W. & Franz Huber
    1982 Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, gryllus campestris L. Journal of Comparative Physiology A(). –. 10.1007/BF00610234
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610234 [Google Scholar]
  135. Woodruff Carr, Kali, Danielle R. Perszyk, Elizabeth S. Norton, Joel L. Voss, David Poeppel & Sandra R. Waxman
    2021 Developmental changes in auditory-evoked neural activity underlie infants’ links between language and cognition. Developmental Science(). . 10.1111/desc.13121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13121 [Google Scholar]
  136. Wrangham, Richard W. & Brian Hare
    2019 Hypotheses for the evolution of reduced reactive aggression in the self-domesticated hominins. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01914
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01914 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.26001.rey
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/elt.26001.rey
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error