1887
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of the study is to explore online conference announcements as sites for disciplinary communication and the way they are realized linguistically. A corpus of 50 conference announcements included in a major listserv in the field of linguistics is analysed, focusing on rhetorical structure and major interpersonal features, namely self mentions, engagement markers, modal verbs and the use of passive voice. Results show that linguistic interpersonal markers are deployed in the text according to the various communicative functions the text has and also the role played by the writer at each stage and, subsequently, the roles ascribed to readers. Moreover, it is claimed that the wide distribution of conference announcements ensured through electronic platforms reinforces the strategic role of these texts as vehicles of communication and interaction among disciplinary members.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00011.lor
2018-10-19
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, Laurence
    2017 AntConc (Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. www.laurenceanthony.net/software (Last accessed on2 September 2018).
  2. Askehave, Inger & Anne Ellerup Nielsen
    2005 Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology and People18 (2): 120–141. 10.1108/09593840510601504
    https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510601504 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Marcy Lassotta
    1999 The evolution of Internet genres. Computers and Composition16 (2): 269–282. 10.1016/S8755‑4615(99)00007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00007-9 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bawarshi, Anis S. & Mary Jo Reiff
    2010Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. Lafayette, USA: Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin
    1993 Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication10 (4): 475–509. 10.1177/0741088393010004001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010004001 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1995Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Breivega, Kjersti, Trine Dahl & Kjersti Fløttum
    2002 Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics12 (2): 218–239. 10.1111/1473‑4192.00032
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00032 [Google Scholar]
  9. Charles, Maggie
    1999 Aspects of the author’s voice in three academic research articles. InIssues in EAP Writing Research and Instructions, Paul Thompson (ed.). Reading, UK: CALS publication, 71–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cherry, Roger D.
    1998 Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication5 (3): 251–276. 10.1177/0741088388005003001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088388005003001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crowston, Kevin & Marie Williams
    2000 Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. The Information Society16: 201–215. 10.1080/01972240050133652
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240050133652 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dimitrios, Nasiopoulos K., Damianos P. Sakas & D. S. Vlachos
    2014 Modeling publications in academic conferences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences147: 467–477. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.139
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.139 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ding, Huiling
    2007 Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes26 (3): 368–392. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Herring, Susan C.
    2004 Computer-mediated discourse analysis. InDesigning for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Sasha Barab, Rob Kling & James H. Gray (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 338–376. 10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.016 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2007 A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. [email protected]4 (1). www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761 (Last accessed on2 September 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2013 Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. InDiscourse 2.0: Language and New Media, Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hyland, Ken
    2001 Humble servants of the discipline? Self mentions in research articles. English for Specific Purposes20 (3): 207–226. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00012‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2002 Options of identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics34 (8): 1091–1112. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00035‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2004 Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing13: 133–151. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2005aMetadiscourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2005b Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies7 (2): 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ivanič, Roz
    1998Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jenkins, Jennifer, Alessia Cogo & Martin Dewey
    2011 Review of developments in research into English as a Lingua Franca. Language Teaching44 (3): 281–315. 10.1017/S0261444811000115
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000115 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuo, Chih-Hua
    1999 The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes18 (2): 121–138. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(97)00058‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, Catherine
    2014 Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later. Letras & Letras31 (3): 56–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mur-Dueñas, M. Pilar, Rosa Lorés-Sanz & Enrique Lafuente-Millán
    2010 Editorial. Journal of English for Academic Purposes9 (2): 83–85. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  27. Orlikowski, Wanda & Jo Anne Yates
    1994 Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly39 (4): 541–574. 10.2307/2393771
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2393771 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
    2013 The article of the future: Strategies for genre stability and change. English for Specific Purposes32 (4): 221–235. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Räisänen, Christine
    1999The Conference Forum as a System of Genres. Gothenberg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sancho-Guinda, Carmen
    2015 Genres on the move: Currency and erosion of the genre moves construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes19: 73–87. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schryer, Catherine
    1994 The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. InGenre and the New Rhetoric, Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds). London: Taylor & Francis, 105–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. St Aman, Kirk & Rich Rice
    2015 Online writing in global contexts: Rethinking the nature of connections and communication in the age of international online media. Computers and Composition38: v–x. 10.1016/S8755‑4615(15)00104‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(15)00104-8 [Google Scholar]
  34. Swales, John M.
    1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2004Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tang, Ramona & Suganthi John
    1999 The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes18 (Supplement 1): S23–S39. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00009‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5 [Google Scholar]
  37. Thurlow, Crispin & Kristine Mroczek
    (eds) 2011 Introduction: Fresh perspectives on new media sociolinguistics. Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xix–xxxliv. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Vande Kopple, William J.
    1985 Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication36 (1): 63–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vassileva, Irena
    1998 Who am I/Who are we in academic writing?International Journal of Applied Linguistics8 (2): 163–190. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1998.tb00128.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x [Google Scholar]
  40. 2000Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, Wenhsien
    2013 Two folded messages behind CFP: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of Language Studies7 (2): 83–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2015 “Call for papers”: Analysis of the schematic structure and lexico-grammar of CFPs for academic conferences. English for Specific Purposes37 (1): 39–51. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00011.lor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00011.lor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error