Dancygier, Barbara (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics

References

1. Bateman, John
   2014 Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315773971
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773971 [Google Scholar]
2. Blomberg, Johan & Jordan Zlatev
   2014 Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences13 (3): 395–418. 10.1007/s11097‑013‑9299‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9299-x [Google Scholar]
3. Boroditsky, Lera
   2011 How language shapes thought. Scientific American304 (2): 62–65. 10.1038/scientificamerican0211‑62
   https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0211-62 [Google Scholar]
4. Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner
   2005 The career of metaphor. Psychological Review112 (1): 193. 10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 [Google Scholar]
5. Casasanto, Daniel
   2008 Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning58: 63–79. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00462.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00462.x [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   2016 Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics27 (4): 587–602. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0056
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0056 [Google Scholar]
7. Dąbrowska, Ewa & Dagmar Divjak
   2015 Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110292022
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022 [Google Scholar]
8. Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
   2017 Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics28 (3): 371–380. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0075
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0075 [Google Scholar]
9. Devylder, Simon & Jordan Zlatev
   . Forthcoming. Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the motivation and sedimentation model. InFigurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language, Annalisa Baicchi & Günter Radden eds Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan
    2016 Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics27 (4): 447–463. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0095
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0095 [Google Scholar]
11. Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens
    (eds) 2007 The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gibbs, Raymond W. J.
    2005 The psychological status of image schemas. InFrom Perception to Meaning, Beate Hampe (ed.). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 113–136. 10.1515/9783110197532.2.113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.2.113 [Google Scholar]
13. Green, Jennifer
    2014 Drawn from the Ground: Sound, Sign and Inscription in Central Australian Sand Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139237109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139237109 [Google Scholar]
14. Harder, Peter
    1996 Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110818758
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110818758 [Google Scholar]
15. Husserl, Edmund
    1978 The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Itkonen, Esa
    2003 What is Language?Turku: University of Turku Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Itkonen, Esa
    2008 Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies15 (6): 15–33.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Janda, Laura A.
    2013 Cognitive Linguistics–The Quantitative Turn: The Essential Reader. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110335255
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335255 [Google Scholar]
19. Jewitt, Carey
    (ed.) 2009 The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lane, Harlan
    1984 When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    2012 Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Müller, Cornelia
    2009 Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi
    . In press. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Steen, Gerard J.
    2011 The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved!Review of Cognitive Linguistics9 (1): 26–64. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
26. Stöckl, Hartmut
    2004 Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache: Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte. Theorien. Analysemethoden. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110201994
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110201994 [Google Scholar]
27. Sweetser, Eve
    2012 Introduction: Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground down. InViewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier and Eve Sweetser (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–22. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.002 [Google Scholar]
28. Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky
    2011 Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS one6 (2): e16782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
29. Zinken, Jörg
    2007 Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics18 (3): 445–466. 10.1515/COG.2007.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.024 [Google Scholar]
30. Zlatev, Jordan
    2018 Mimesis theory, learning, and polysemiotic communication. InEncyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Michael A. Peters (ed.). Singapore: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑981‑287‑532‑7_672‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_672-1 [Google Scholar]
31. Zlatev, Jordan & Johan Blomberg
    2016 Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics39 (2): 185–208. 10.1017/S0332586516000123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586516000123 [Google Scholar]