Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This article explores how the notion of decreation manifests itself in the signifying strategies of Anne Carson’s (2005). By revisiting Carson’s stereoscopic poetics and Wolfgang Iser’s branch of reader-response criticism, the article conceptualises these signification strategies, which include generic hybridity and multimodality, as guiding devices that usher the reader’s perspective towards a stereoscopic vision of sameness-in-otherness. These strategies can evoke a sense of ‘decreation’ by drawing the reader’s attention to the boundary between (apparent) incongruities whilst simultaneously encouraging the reader to forge previously unsuspected connections. The semiological argument proposed here concludes that the transcendence of this ‘edge’ by means of analogical thinking constitutes the metaphysical project of personal re-creation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adorno, Theodor W.
    2001 [1965]Metaphysics: Concept and Problems, Rolf Tiedemann (ed.), Edmund Jephcott (trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, Allen
    1962 T. S. Eliot’s theory of dissociation. College English23 (4): 309–312. 10.2307/373077
    https://doi.org/10.2307/373077 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baxter, Leslie A. & Barbara M. Montgomery
    1996Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, Andrew
    (ed.) 1995Readers and Reading. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blaser, Robin
    2006 The fire. InThe Fire: Collected Essays of Robin Blaser, Miriam Nichols (ed.). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 3–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burns, Tom & Jeffrey W. Hunter
    (eds) 2004Contemporary Literary Criticism, Vol.185. Detroit: Gale.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Burt, Stephen
    2000 Anne Carson: Poetry without borders. Publishers Weekly (3April). https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/authors/interviews/article/39881-anne-carson-poetry-without-borders.html (Last accessed on22 June 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carson, Anne
    2006 [2005]Decreation: Poetry, Essays, Opera. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1988 [1986]Eros the Bittersweet: An Essay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collard, Christophe
    2014 Mediaturgy’s troubled tensions with adaptation: Convergence or divergence?Adaptation7 (3): 265–274. 10.1093/adaptation/apu031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apu031 [Google Scholar]
  11. Conte, Joseph M.
    1991Unending Design: The Forms of Postmodern Poetry. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cranny-Francis, Anne
    2005Multimedia: Texts and Contexts. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781849209472
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209472 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culler, Jonathan
    2001The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Rev. ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari
    2000 [1972]Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans.Robert Hurley Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Derrida, Jacques
    2000 The law of genre. InModern Genre Theory, David Duff (ed.). Harlow: Longman, 219–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dewey, Anne Day
    2015 The modern American long poem. InThe Cambridge Companion to Modern American Poetry, Walter Kalaidjian (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 65–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Michele, Mary
    1996 Anne Carson: The Matrix interview. Matrix49: 10–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Drucker, Johanna
    2009 Entity to event: From literal, mechanistic materiality to probabilistic materiality. Parallax15 (4): 7–17. 10.1080/13534640903208834
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13534640903208834 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2008 Graphic devices: Narration and navigation. Narrative16 (2): 121–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunkelberg, Kendall
    2017A Writer’s Craft: Multi-Genre Creative Writing. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑61096‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-61096-6 [Google Scholar]
  21. DuPlessis, Rachel Blau
    2015 Objectivist poetry and poetics. InThe Cambridge Companion to Modern American Poetry, Walter Kalaidjian (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 89–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eco, Umberto
    1984Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. London: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑17338‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Eliot, T. S.
    1934Selected Essays. 2nd ed.London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1993The Varieties of Metaphysical Poetry. Ed.Ronald Schuchard. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Elleström, Lars
    2010 The modalities of media: A model for understanding intermedial relations. InMedia Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, Lars Elleström (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 11–48. 10.1057/9780230275201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275201_2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ensslin, Astrid
    2010 Respiratory narrative: Multimodality and cybernetic corporeality in “physio-cybertext”. InNew Perspectives on Narrative and Multimodality, Ruth Page (ed.). New York and London: Routledge, 155–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fisher, Jessica
    2015 Anne Carson’s stereoscopic poetics. InAnne Carson: Ecstatic Lyre, Joshua Marie Wilkinson (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 10–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Garratt, Peter
    (ed.) 2016The Cognitive Humanities: Embodied Mind in Literature and Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59329‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59329-0 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gibbons, Alison
    2012Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. New York and London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203803219
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803219 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2013 Multimodal metaphors in contemporary experimental literature. Metaphor and the Social World3 (2): 180–198. 10.1075/msw.3.2.04gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.2.04gib [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilbert, Sandra M.
    1996 Looks of memory and desire. Poetry168 (5): 281–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Harrington, Joseph
    2016 The politics of docupoetry. InThe News from Poems: Essays on the 21st-Century American Poetry of Engagement, Jeffrey Gray & Ann Keniston (eds). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 67–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayles, N. Katherine
    2013 Combining close and distant reading: Jonathan Safran Foer’s Tree of Codes and the aesthetic of bookishness. PMLA128 (1): 226–231. 10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.226
    https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.226 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1999How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2012How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Iser, Wolfgang
    1995 Interaction between text and reader. InReaders and Reading, Andrew Bennett (ed.). Harlow: Longman, 20–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackson, Virginia
    2005Dickinson’s Misery: A Theory of Lyric Reading. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jennings, Chris
    2001 The erotic poetics of Anne Carson. University of Toronto Quarterly70 (4): 923–936. 10.3138/utq.70.4.923
    https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.70.4.923 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kress, Gunther
    2003Literacy in the New Media Age. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203164754
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754 [Google Scholar]
  40. Laccetti, Jessica
    2010 Cruising along: Time in Ankerson and Sapnar. InNew Perspectives on Narrative and Multimodality, Ruth Page (ed.). New York and London: Routledge, 166–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lecercle, Jean-Jacques
    2010Badiou and Deleuze Read Literature. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638000.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638000.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lewis, Pericles
    2007The Cambridge Introduction to Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803055 [Google Scholar]
  43. Logan, William
    2009Our Savage Art: Poetry and the Civil Tongue. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/loga14732
    https://doi.org/10.7312/loga14732 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lomborg, Stine
    2014Social Media, Social Genres: Making Sense of the Ordinary. New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. McCorkle, James
    1997 The inscription of postmodernism in poetry. InInternational Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice, Hans Bertens & Douwe Fokkema (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 43–50. 10.1075/chlel.xi.04mcc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xi.04mcc [Google Scholar]
  46. Nørgaard, Nina
    2010 Multimodality and the literary text: Making sense of Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. InNew Perspectives on Narrative and Multimodality, Ruth Page (ed.). New York and London: Routledge, 115–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Plate, Liedeke
    2015 How to do things with literature in the digital age: Anne Carson’s Nox, multimodality, and the ethics of bookishness. Contemporary Women’s Writing9 (1): 93–111. 10.1093/cww/vpu038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cww/vpu038 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pollock, James
    2012You Are Here: Essays on the Art of Poetry in Canada. Erin, Ont.: The Porcupine’s Quill.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pressman, Jessica
    2009 The aesthetic of bookishness in twenty-first-century literature. Michigan Quarterly Review48 (4). hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.act2080.0048.402 (Last accessed on4 January 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rae, Ian
    2008From Cohen to Carson: The Poet’s Novel in Canada. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2011 Verglas: Narrative technique in Anne Carson’s “The Glass Essay”. ESC: English Studies in Canada37 (3–4): 163–186. 10.1353/esc.2011.0054
    https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.2011.0054 [Google Scholar]
  52. Shapiro, Lawrence
    (ed.) 2014The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315775845
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775845 [Google Scholar]
  53. Skibsrud, Johanna
    2015 “To undo the creature”: The paradox of writing in Anne Carson’s Decreation. InAnne Carson: Ecstatic Lyre, Joshua Marie Wilkinson (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 132–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Stafford, Barbara Maria
    2001 [1999]Visual Analogy: Consciousness as the Art of Connecting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7123.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7123.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Thorp, Jennifer R.
    2015 “Prowling the meanings: Anne Carson’s doubtful forms” and “The Traitor’s Symphony”. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.
  56. Wilkinson, Joshua Marie
    (ed.) 2015Anne Carson: Ecstatic Lyre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.7573555
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7573555 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analogy; Anne Carson; Decreation; generic hybridity; multimodality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error