Beyond proficiency

References

1. Beers, Scott F. & William E. Nagy
   2009 Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre?Reading and Writing22 (2): 185–200. 10.1007/s11145‑007‑9107‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5 [Google Scholar]
2. Berninger, Virginia W., Robert D. Abbott, William Nagy & Joanne Carlisle
   2010 Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research39 (2): 141–163. 10.1007/s10936‑009‑9130‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6 [Google Scholar]
3. Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen
   2014 Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing26: 42–65. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005 [Google Scholar]
4. Connor, Ulla
   1990 Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English: 67–87.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Connor-Linton, Jeff & Charlene Polio
   2014 Comparing perspectives on L2 writing: Multiple analyses of a common corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing26: 1–9. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
6. Crowhurst, Marion
   1983 Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L’education: 1–16.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara
   2010 Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency. InProceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stellan Ohlsson & Richard Catrambone (eds). Cognitive Science Society, 984–989.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crossley, Scott. A. & Danielle S. McNamara
   2011 Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning21 (2): 170–191. 10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040197
   https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040197 [Google Scholar]
9. Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara
   2012 Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading35 (2): 115–135. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2010.01449.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x [Google Scholar]
10. Crossley, Scott A., Jennifer L. Weston, Susan T. McLain & Danielle S. McNamara
    2011 The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication28: 282–311. 10.1177/0741088311410188
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311410188 [Google Scholar]
11. Cruse, Alan
    2011 Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford UK: Oxford University.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Culpeper, Jonathan 15
    2002 Computers, language and characterisation: An Analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet. InConversation in Life and in Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium, Association Suedoise de Linguistique Appliquee (ASLA)15, Ulla Melander-Marttala, Carin Ostman & Merja Kyto (eds). Uppsala, Sweden: Universitetstryckeriet, 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Engber, Cheryl A.
    1995 The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing4 (2): 139–155. 10.1016/1060‑3743(95)90004‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90004-7 [Google Scholar]
14. Ferris, Dana R.
    1994 Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly28 (2): 414–420. 10.2307/3587446
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587446 [Google Scholar]
15. Fischer-Starcke, Bettina
    2010 Corpus linguistics in literary analysis: Jane Austen and her contemporaries. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Graesser, Arthur C., Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse & Zhiqiang Cai
    2004 Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers36: 193–202. 10.3758/BF03195564
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564 [Google Scholar]
17. Grant, Leslie & April Ginther
    2000 Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing9 (2): 123–145. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(00)00019‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9 [Google Scholar]
18. Hoey, Michael
    2005 Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hornaday, Ann
    2012 Adolescent love among eccentrics [Web blog post]. www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/moonrise-kingdom.1221101.html (Last accessed on17 November 2013).
20. Jin, Wenjun
    2001 A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students’ writing: Variations across genres and proficiency levels. Paper presented at theSymposium on Second Language Writing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 15–16 September, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Louis, Annie & Ani Nenkova
    2011 Automatic identification of general and specific sentences by leveraging discourse annotations. Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Thailand: Asian Foundation of Natural Language Processing, 605–613.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Louis, Annie & Ani Nenkova
    2013a A corpus of science journalism for analyzing writing quality. Dialogue and Discourse4 (2): 87–117. 10.5087/dad.2013.205
    https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2013.205 [Google Scholar]
23. Louis, Annie & Ani Nenkova
    2013b What makes writing great? First experiments on article quality prediction in the science journalism domain. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics1: 341–352. 10.1162/tacl_a_00232
    https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00232 [Google Scholar]
24. Lu, Xiaofei
    2010 Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics15: 474–496. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu [Google Scholar]
25. Lu, Xiaofei
    2012 The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. Modern Language Journal96 (2): 190–208. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01232_1.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x [Google Scholar]
26. Luke
    Luke (2012) Moonrise Kingdom [Web blog post]. canetoadwarrior.blogspot.com/2012/10/moonrise-kingdom.html (Last accessed on29 September 2013).
27. Mahlberg, Michaela
    2007 Corpus stylistics: Bridging the gap between linguistic and literary studies. InText, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis, Michael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs & Wolfgang Teubert (eds). London UK: Continuum, 219–246.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McCutchen, Deborah & Charles A. Perfetti
    1982 Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production. Text2 (1–3): 113–140. 10.1515/text.1.1982.2.1‑3.113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1982.2.1-3.113 [Google Scholar]
29. McGrath, R. E., & Meyer, G. J.
    2006 When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d. Psychological Methods11(4), 386–401. 10.1037/1082‑989X.11.4.386
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.386 [Google Scholar]
30. McNamara, Danielle. S., Scott A. Crossley & Philip M. McCarthy
    2010 Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication27 (1): 57–86. 10.1177/0741088309351547
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547 [Google Scholar]
31. Ortega, Lourdes
    2003 Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics24 (4): 492–518. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492 [Google Scholar]
32. Ortega, Lourdes
    2015 Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing29: 82–94. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008 [Google Scholar]
33. Read, John
    2000 Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511732942
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942 [Google Scholar]
34. Shaughnessy, M. P.
    1979 Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Stubbs, Michael
    2005 Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language and Literature14 (1): 5–24. 10.1177/0963947005048873
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005048873 [Google Scholar]
36. The Pulitzer Prizes: Honoring Excellence in Journalism and the Arts
    The Pulitzer Prizes: Honoring Excellence in Journalism and the Arts. (n.d.). www.pulitzer.org (Last accessed on10 November 2013).
37. van Peer, Willie
    (ed) 2008 The quality of literature: Linguistic studies in literary evaluation4. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lal.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.4 [Google Scholar]
38. Widdowson, Henry George
    1992 Practical stylistics: An approach to poetry. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wolfe-Quintero, Kate, Shunji Inagaki & Hae-Young Kim
    1998 Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]