1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. English Text Construction
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper is concerned with constructed dialog in conversational storytelling. Based on Clark & Gerrig’s (1990) demonstration theory, its focus is on what is absent from constructed dialog. To determine what is absent, a comparison is made between constructed dialog tokens and utterances in conversation. The inquiry uses both quantitative and qualitative methods. It is based on the Narrative Corpus (NC; Rühlemann & O’Donnell 2012), a corpus of conversational narratives extracted from the conversational component of the British National Corpus (BNC), and its systematic annotation of constructed dialog (that is, direct speech introduced by a quotative and free direct speech without any introducer). The quantitative comparison of verbalizations used in constructed dialog as opposed to verbalizations used in conversational utterances demonstrates that a particular utterance type is significantly missing from constructed dialog: the continuer utterance, whose basic function is to exhibit an understanding that a form of ‘telling’ by another speaker is going on. The qualitative analysis, based on a subset of storytellings from the NC that were re-analyzed acoustically and re-transcribed using Jeffersonian conventions based on the Audio BNC (Coleman et al. 2012), reveals a stark mismatch between the commonness of tellings in talk-in-interaction and their uncommonness in constructed dialog. The absence of continuers from constructed dialog is discussed against the backdrop of indexicality. I argue that continuers share the key properties of indexicals – semantic vacuity and an existential relationship with the ‘thing’ indicated – and can therefore be seen as indexicals themselves. As indexicals, intrinsically connected to the speech situation of their utterance, continuers cannot be included in constructed dialog, which typically occurs in a different speech situation with different interactional parameters. Finally, I offer initial thoughts on the underrepresentation of telling sequences in constructed dialog.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
2020-12-10
2024-12-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barthes, Roland
    1975 An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History6 (2): 237–272. 10.2307/468419
     https://doi.org/10.2307/468419 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bavelas, Janet Beavin , Linda Coates & Trudy Johnson
    2000 Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79: 941–952. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.6.941
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackwell, Natalia L. , Marcus Perlman & Jean E. Fox Tree
    2015 Quotation as multi-modal construction. Journal of Pragmatics81: 1–7. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bühler, Karl
    1990 [1934] Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/fos.25
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.25 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
    1997 Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chatman, Seymour
    1975 Towards a theory of narrative. New Literary History6 (2): 295–318. 10.2307/468421
     https://doi.org/10.2307/468421 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, Herbert H.
    2016 Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review123 (3): 324–347. 10.1037/rev0000026
     https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language66(4): 764–805. 10.2307/414729
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clift, Rebecca & Elizabeth Holt
    2007 Introduction. InReporting talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Coleman, John , Ladan Baghai-Ravary , John Pybus & Sergio Grau
    2012 Audio BNC: The Audio Edition of the Spoken British National Corpus. Phonetics Laboratory, University of Oxford. www.phon.ox.ac.uk/AudioBNC (7October 2020).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Coulmas, F.
    1986 Reported speech: Some general issues. In F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp.1–28. 10.1515/9783110871968.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Drew, Paul
    1998 Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction31: 295–325. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gardner, R.
    1998 Between speaking and listening: The vocalisation of understandings. Applied Linguistics19(2): 204–224. 10.1093/applin/19.2.204
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.204 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, Ervin
    1981 Forms of talk. Philadelphia PA: Philadelphia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Charles
    1986 Between and within alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies9: 205–217. 10.1007/BF00148127
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Goodwin
    1992 Assessments and the construction of context. InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Allesandro Duranti (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Charles & John Heritage
    1990 Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 283–307. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann, Sebastian , Stefan Evert , Nicholas Smith , David Lee & Ylva Berglund Prytz
    2008 Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical Guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hepburn, Alexa & Galina Bolden
    2017 Transcribing for Social Research. Los Angeles CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781473920460
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920460 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hömke, Paul , Judith Holler & Stephen C. Levinson
    2017 Eye blinking as addressee feedback in face-to-face conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction50 (1): 54–70. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262143
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1262143 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoey, Elliot Michael
    2017 Sequence recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics109: 47–63. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holt, Elizabeth
    1996 Reporting talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction29 (3): 219–245. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2000 Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on language and social interaction33 (4): 425–454. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_04 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2007 ‘I’m eying your chop up mind’: Reporting and enacting. InReporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Gene H. Lerner (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–31. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  26. Jespersen, O.
    1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Koester, Almut & Michael Handford
    2018 It’s not good saying “Well it it might do that or it might not”’: Hypothetical reported speech in business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics130: 67–80. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, William
    1972 Language in the Inner City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky
    1967/1997 Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. InEssays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, June Helms (ed.). Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44, reprinted inJournal of Narrative Inquiry and Life History7 (1–4): 3–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short
    1981 Style in Fiction. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2004 Deixis. InThe handbook of pragmatics, Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds). Malden, MA: Blackwell, 97–121.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 On the human interactional engine. InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, Nicholas Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds). Oxford: Berg, 39–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2016 Turn-taking in human communication: Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences20 (1): 6–14. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Levinson, Stephen C. & Judith Holler
    2014 The origin of human multi-modal communication. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B369 (1651): 20130302. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2013.0302
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0302 [Google Scholar]
  36. Levinson, Stephen C. & Francisco Torreira
    2015 Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (731). doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 [Google Scholar]
  37. Longacre, Robert E.
    1983 The grammar of Discourse. New York NY: Plenum Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mathis, Terrie & George Yule
    1994 Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes18 (1): 63–76. 10.1080/01638539409544884
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544884 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mayes, Patricia
    1990 Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language14: 325–363. 10.1075/sl.14.2.04may
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.04may [Google Scholar]
  40. McCarthy, Michael
    2003 Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction36 (1): 33–63. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_3 [Google Scholar]
  41. McIntyre, Daniel , Carol Bellard Thomson , John Heywood , Tony McEnery , Elena Semino & Mick Short
    2004 Investigating the presentation of speech, writing and thought in spoken British English: A corpus-based approach. ICAME Journal28: 49–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Mindt, Dieter
    2000 An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb System. Berlin: Cornelsen.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Nichols, Thomas E. & Andrew P. Holmes
    2001 Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping15 (1): 1–25. 10.1002/hbm.1058
     https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1058 [Google Scholar]
  44. O’Keeffe, A. and S. Adolphs
    2008 ‘Response tokens in British and Irish discourse. Corpus, context and variational pragmatics‘. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (eds) Variational pragmatics) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.69–98. 10.1075/pbns.178.05ok
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.178.05ok [Google Scholar]
  45. Peters, Pam & Deanna Wong
    2015 Turn management and backchannels. InCorpus Pragmatics: A handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christophe Rühlemann (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 408–429. 10.1017/CBO9781139057493.022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493.022 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rühlemann, Cristophe
    2013 Narrative in English Conversation: A Corpus Analysis of Storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139026987
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026987 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2017 Integrating corpus-linguistic and conversation-analytic transcription in XML. The case of backchannels and overlap in storytelling interaction. Corpus Pragmatics1 (3): 201–232. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0018‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0018-7 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rühlemann, Cristophe and Matthew B. O’Donnell
    2012 Towards a corpus of conversational narrative. Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory8 (2): 313–350. 10.1515/cllt‑2012‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0015 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rühlemann, Cristophe and Stefan T. Gries
    2015 Turn order and turn distribution in multi-party storytelling. Journal of Pragmatics87: 171–191. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rühlemann, C. and M. Gee
    2017 Conversation Analysis and the XML method. Gesprächsforschung18: 274–296.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rühlemann, Cristophe & Martin Hilpert
    2017 Colloquialization in journalistic writing: Investigating inserts in TIME magazine with a focus on well . Journal of Historical Pragmatics18 (1): 102–135. 10.1075/jhp.18.1.05ruh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18.1.05ruh [Google Scholar]
  52. Rühlemann, Cristophe
    2018 TCU-initial backchannel overlap in storytelling. Narrative Inquiry28 (2): 257–279. 10.1075/ni.17060.ruh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17060.ruh [Google Scholar]
  53. Rühlemann, C , A. Bagoutdinov and M. B. O’Donnell
    2015 Modest XPath and XQuery for corpora: Exploiting deep XML annotation. ICAME Journal39: 47–84. 10.1515/icame‑2015‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2015-0003 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1982 Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. InAnalyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Deborah Tannen (ed). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 71–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  58. Semino, Elena & Mick Short
    2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sidnell, Jack
    2006 Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language in Social Interaction39 (4): 377–409. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2 [Google Scholar]
  60. Short, Mick , Elena Semino & Jonathan Culpeper
    1996 Using a corpus for stylistics research: Speech and thought presentation. InUsing corpora for Language Research: Studies in Honour of Geoffrey Leech, Jenny Thomas & Mick Short (eds). London: Longman, 110–131.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Soulaimani, Dris
    2018 Talk, voice and gestures in reported speech: Toward an integrated approach. Discourse Studies20 (3): 361–376. 10.1177/1461445618754419
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618754419 [Google Scholar]
  62. Stec, Kashmiri , Mike Huiskes & Gisela Redeker
    2016 Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics104: 1–17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41 (1): 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2013 Sequence organization. InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds). Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell, 191–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Stivers, Tanya , Nicholas J. Enfield , Penelope Brown , Christina Englert , Makato Hayashi , Trine Heinemann , Gertie Hoymann , Federico Rossano , Jan Peter de Ruiter , Kyung-Eun Yoon & Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences. U.S.A.106 (26): 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tannen, Deborah
    1986 Introducing constructed dialog in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. InDirect and Indirect Speech, Florian Coulmas (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 311–332. 10.1515/9783110871968.311
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.311 [Google Scholar]
  67. 1989 Talking Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. ten Bosch, Louis , Nelleke Oostdijk & Lou Boves
    2005 On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication47: 80–86. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tolins, Jackson & Jean E. Fox Tree
    2014 Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics70: 152–164. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Dijk, Teun
    1975 Action, action description, and narrative. New Literary History6 (2): 273–294. 10.2307/468420
     https://doi.org/10.2307/468420 [Google Scholar]
  71. Van Dijk, Teun & Walter Kintsch
    1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York NY: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Wade, Elizabeth & Herbert H. Clark
    1993 Reproduction and demonstration in quotations. Journal of Memory and Language, 32 (6), 805–819. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1040
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1040 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wennerstrom, Ann
    2001 The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Wesseling, Wieneke & Rob J. J. H van Son
    2005 Timing of experimentally elicited minimal responses as quantitative evidence for the use of intonation in projecting trps. Interspeech6, 3389–3392.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. White, Sheida
    1989 Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society18 (1): 59–76. 10.1017/S0047404500013270
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013270 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wong, Deanna & Pam Peters
    2007 A study of backchannels in regional varieties of English, using corpus mark-up as the means of identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics12 (4): 479–509. 10.1075/ijcl.12.4.03won
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.4.03won [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
Loading
What dialog is absent from constructed dialog?
English Text Construction 13, 132 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): backchannels; constructed dialog; continuers; demonstration; indexicals

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error