1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. English Text Construction
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates conflict-motivated pragmatic acts employed in the open letters exchanged by two former Nigerian presidents (Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan). The data are analysed using Mey’s pragmatic act theory. The findings reveal that while Obasanjo employs pragmatic acts of warning, appealing, and praising in order to counsel Jonathan, Jonathan employs pragmatic acts of acknowledging, boasting, correcting, and reminding in order to defend himself. However, they both employ the pragmatic acts of insulting, complaining, accusing, and requesting. These acts are influenced by nationalist and anti-ethnic ideologies as well as the context of the open letters, i.e., conflict among political leaders in Nigeria.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00039.unu
2020-12-10
2024-10-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/etc.00039.unu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akyeampong, Emmanuel K. & Henry L. Gates, Jr.
    (eds) 2012 Dictionary of African Biography. London: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, Keith
    2010 Referring as a pragmatic act. Journal of Pragmatics42 (11): 2919–2931. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anchimbe, Eric
    2013 ‘Motions of Support’ and the communicative act of thanking in political discourse. InThe Pragmatics of Political Discourse, Anita Fetzer (ed). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–242. 10.1075/pbns.228.12anc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.12anc [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashraf, Hina
    2014 Letters to the editor: A resistant genre of unrepresented voices. Discourse and Communication8 (1): 3–21. 10.1177/1750481313503225
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503225 [Google Scholar]
  5. Auchmuty, Rosemary
    1994 Inversions: A tribute to the late all-women publishing house, open letters. Women’s History Review3 (3): 439–443. 10.1080/09612029400200061
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09612029400200061 [Google Scholar]
  6. Austin, John
    1962 How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish
    1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bagwasi, Mompoloki M.
    2008 Pragmatics of letter writing in Setswana. Journal of Pragmatics40 (3): 525–536. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chiluwa, Innocent
    2015 Radicalist discourse: A study of the stances of Nigeria’s Boko Haram and Somalia’s Al Shabaab on twitter. Journal of Multicultural Discourses10: 214–235. 10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964 [Google Scholar]
  11. Compton, Josh & Jordan L. Compton
    2013 College sports, losing seasons, and image repair through open letters to fans. Communication and Sport2 (4): 345–362. 10.1177/2167479513503542
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479513503542 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cutting, Joan
    (2002) Pragmatics and Discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Doty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen
    2009 Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial records of Salem, 1692. Journal of Pragmatics41 (3): 458–469. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fraser, Bruce
    1996 Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics6 (2): 167–190. 10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  15. Geis, Michael L.
    1995 Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554452
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554452 [Google Scholar]
  16. Henry, Alex & Debbie G. E. Ho
    2010 The act of complaining in Brunei – then and Now. Journal of Pragmatics42 (3): 840–855. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Igwebuike, Ebuka & Ikenna Kamalu
    2015 A critical discourse analysis of rhetorical strategies in open letters to president Olusegun Obasanjo in selected Nigerian newspapers. InEssays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, Akin Odebunmi & Joyce T. Mathangwane (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 250–274.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kecskes, Istvan
    2010 Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics42 (11): 2889–2897. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kupolati, Oluwateniola Oluwabukola & Eniola Boluwaduro
    2018 Gubernatorial debate sessions in Nigeria: A socio-cognitive analysis. Discourse and Communication12 (1): 20–38. 10.1177/1750481317735710
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317735710 [Google Scholar]
  20. Landert, Daniela & Andreas H. Jucker
    2010 Private and public in mass media communication: From letters to the editor to online commentaries. Journal of Pragmatics43 (5): 1422–1434. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin, John. R. & Peter R. R. White
    (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Monehin, Funmi
    2015 A Stylistic Analysis of Language of Politics in the Open Letters Exchanged between Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and President Goodluck Jonathan (Unpublished BA thesis). Redeemer’s University, Nigeria.
  24. Nevalainen, Terttu & Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
    (eds) 2007 Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Nwokocha, Stanley
    2014 Nigeria: Godfathers-Godson Relationships Gone Sour. AllAfrica.comhttps://allafrica.com/stories/201404280826.html
  26. Odebunmi, Akin
    2006 A pragmatic reading of Ahmed Yerima’s proverbs in Yemoja, Attahiru, and Dry Leaves on Ukan Trees . Intercultural Pragmatics3 (2): 153–169. 10.1515/IP.2006.010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2006.010 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2008 Pragmatic functions of crisis-motivated proverbs in Ola Rotimi’s The God’s are not to Blame . Linguistik Online33 (1): 73–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 2015 Ọmọlúàbí. InHandbook of Pragmatics Online (Vol.19). Ola J. Ostman & Jef Verschueren (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–20. 10.1075/hop.19.omo1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.19.omo1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Oladipo, Dotun
    2013 Nigeria needs clarity of purpose – Akinyemi. The Punch, August: 54. 10.1177/1750481310395452
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310395452 [Google Scholar]
  30. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tseng, Ming-Yu
    2010 The pragmatic act of fishing for personal details: From choice to performance. Journal of Pragmatics42 (7):1982–1996. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Unuabonah, Foluke
    2011 Our threatened democracy: A socio-cognitive study of a memo to the Federal Executive Council (FEC) of Nigeria. Issues in Political Discourse Analysis4 (1): 59–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Uzoigwe, Amara M.
    2011 The Nigerian Christian Attitude to Civic Duties: An Exegetical Application of Romans13: 1–7 (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  34. Van Dijk, Teun
    2001 Critical discourse analysis. InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin , Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 352–371.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2002 Political discourse and political cognition. InPolitics as Text and Talk. Analytical approaches to political discourse, Paul A. Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 204–236. 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  36. 2005 Politics, ideology and discourse. InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Wodak Ruth (ed). London: Elsevier, 728–740.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 2006 Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies8 (1): 159–177. 10.1177/1461445606059565
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2010 Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Journal of Language and Politics9 (3): 469–474. 10.1075/jlp.9.3.07lam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.07lam [Google Scholar]
  39. Verschueren, Jef
    1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 2000 Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics10 (4): 439–456. 10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver [Google Scholar]
  41. White, Peter R. R.
    2011 Appraisal. In Jan Zienkwoski , Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 14–36. 10.1075/hoph.8.02whi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.02whi [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00039.unu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acts; context; ideology; Nigeria; political letters; pragmatic acts

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error