1887
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Academic attribution, the direct acknowledgement of external sources, is investigated in two corpora of novice academic English, representing first and second language writing in linguistics. The forms and uses of attribution are analysed in a formal-functional framework. There is an overall underrepresentation of attribution in the learner corpus. However, the corpora have a similar proportional distribution of integral and non-integral attribution, but a difference in subtypes of these. Undated attributions are discussed as a special case. They occur in specific contexts, of which reference to course reading is peculiar to novice writing. Comparisons with expert corpora in Norwegian and English indicate that some, but not all, of the differences between the novice corpora may be linked to influence from the learners’ first language and culture.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00047.has
2022-05-24
2024-04-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BAWE – British Academic Written English Corpus
  2. KIAP – Cultural Identity in Academic Prose
    KIAP – Cultural Identity in Academic Prose: www.uib.no/fremmedsprak/23107/kiap-korpuset
  3. VESPA – Varieties of English for Specific Purposes dAtabase, Norwegian component
    VESPA – Varieties of English for Specific Purposes dAtabase, Norwegian component: www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/services/vespa/
  4. Ädel, Annelie
    2008What uh the folks who did this survey found: Expert attribution in spoken academic lectures. Nordic Journal of English Studies7 (3): 83–102. 10.35360/njes.102
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.102 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ädel, Annelie & Ute Römer
    2012 Research on advanced student writing across disciplines and levels. Introducing the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17 (1): 3–34. 10.1075/ijcl.17.1.01ade
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.1.01ade [Google Scholar]
  6. Aijmer, Karin
    2002 Modality in advanced learners’ written interlanguage. InComputer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, Sylviane Granger, Joseph Hung and Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 55–76. 10.1075/lllt.6.07aij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6.07aij [Google Scholar]
  7. Borg, Erik
    2000 Citation practices in academic writing. InPatterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice, Paul Thompson (ed.). CALS, The University of Reading, 27–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brezina, Vaclav
    2018Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. A Practical Guide. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316410899
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carter-Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet
    2013 Citation from a cross-linguistic perspective: the case of French researchers publishing in English. ESP Across Cultures10: 111–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Charles, Maggie
    2006a The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics27 (3): 492–518. 10.1093/applin/aml021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2006b Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes25, 310–331. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Doccherty, Peter
    2018 An exploratory study in the use of direct quotation by L2 entry level Bachelor students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes40: 36–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ebeling, Signe O. & Alois Heuboeck
    2007 Encoding document information in a corpus of student writing: the British Academic Written English corpus. Corpora2 (2): 241–256. 10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.241
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.241 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fløttum, Kjersti
    2003 Bibliographical references and polyphony in research articles. InAcademic discourse. Multidisciplinary approaches, Kjersti Fløttum & François Rastier (eds). Oslo: Novus, 97–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Dahl & Torodd Kinn
    2006Academic Voices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.148
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.148 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
    2000/2001 The integrated contrastive model. Spicing up your data. Languages in Contrast3 (1): 95–123. 10.1075/lic.3.1.05gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.3.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
  17. Granger, Sylviane
    2009 The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation. InCorpora and Language Teaching, Karin Aijmer (ed.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins, 13–32. 10.1075/scl.33.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.04gra [Google Scholar]
  18. 2015 Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis. A Reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research1 (1): 7–24. 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra [Google Scholar]
  19. Groom, Nicholas
    2000 Attribution and averral revisited: Three perspectives on manifest intertextuality in academic writing. InPatterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice, Paul Thompson (ed.). Reading: University of Reading, 14–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasselgård, Hilde
    2009 Thematic choice and expressions of stance in English argumentative texts by Norwegian learners. InCorpora and Language Teaching, Karin Aijmer (ed.). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 121–139. 10.1075/scl.33.12has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.12has [Google Scholar]
  22. 2017 Stating the obvious: signals of shared knowledge in Norwegian-produced academic English. InLanguage, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina De Vries & Sanne Van Vuuren (eds). Presses universitaires de Louvain, 23–44
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heuboeck, Alois, Jasper Holmes & Hilary Nesi
  24. Hunston, Susan
    1995 A corpus study of some English verbs of attribution. Functions of Language2 (2): 133–158. 10.1075/fol.2.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  25. Hyland, Ken
    1999 Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics20 (3): 341–367. 10.1093/applin/20.3.341
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2000Disciplinary Discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2002 Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. InAcademic Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed.). Harlow: Longman, 115–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hyland, Ken & Feng Jiang
    2019 Points of reference. Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics40 (1): 64–85. 10.1093/applin/amx012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx012 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyland, Theresa Ann
    2009 Drawing a line in the sand: Identifying the borderzone between self and other in EL1 and EL2 citation practices. Assessing Writing14: 62–74. 10.1016/j.asw.2009.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2009.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Larsson, Tove
    2017The importance of, it is important that or importantly? The use of morphologically related stance markers in learner and expert writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22 (1): 57–84. 10.1075/ijcl.22.1.03lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.1.03lar [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
    2014 ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction7 (2): 215–248. 10.1075/etc.7.2.03li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.7.2.03li [Google Scholar]
  32. Mansourizadeh, Kobra & Ummul K. Ahmad
    2011 Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes10 (3): 152–161. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nesi, Hilary
    2021 Sources for courses: Metadiscourse and the role of citation in student writing. Lingua253, 103040. 10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103040 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner
    2012Genres across the Disciplines. Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009030199
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199 [Google Scholar]
  35. Paquot, Magali, Hilde Hasselgård & Signe O. Ebeling
    2013 Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. InTwenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, 377–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Parkinson, Jean & Jill Musgrave
    2014 Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes14: 48–59. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pecorari, Diane
    2006 Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes25: 4–29. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pecorari, Diane & Philip Shaw
    2012 Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing21: 149–164. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  39. Petrić, Bojana
    2007 Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes6 (3), 238–253. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  40. Petrić, Bojana & Nigel Harwood
    2013 Task requirements, task representation, and self-reported citation functions: An exploratory study of a successful L2 student’s writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes12: 110–124. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Scott, Mike
    2012WordSmith Tools version 6, Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sinclair, John M.
    1986 Fictional worlds. InTalking about Text (Discourse Analysis Monographs No. 13), M. Coulthard (ed.). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham, 43–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Swales, John M.
    1990Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2014 Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers: From parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written Communication3 (1): 118–141. 10.1177/0741088313515166
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515166 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tadros, Angela
    1993 The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. InData, Description, Discourse, Michael Hoey (ed.). London: Harper Collins. 98–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Thompson, Geoff & Yiyun Ye
    1991 Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics12 (4): 365–382. 10.1093/applin/12.4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365 [Google Scholar]
  47. Thompson, Paul & Chris Tribble
    2001 Looking at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology5 (3): 91–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson, Paul
    2005 Aspects of identification and position in intertextual reference in PhD theses. InStrategies in Academic Discourse, Elena Tognini-Bonelli & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 31–50. 10.1075/scl.19.04tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.19.04tho [Google Scholar]
  49. Verheijen, Lieke
    2015 The language of quoting in academic writing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics4 (1): 101–121. 10.1075/dujal.4.1.10ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.4.1.10ver [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiemeyer, Leonie
    2019 Direct quotation in second language writing. A corpus-based study of intertextuality in academic learner English. InLearner Corpora and Language Teaching, Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 129–156. 10.1075/scl.92.07wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.07wie [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00047.has
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00047.has
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): academic English; attribution; Norwegian learners of English; novice writing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error