1887
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Direct quotation (DQ) use varies considerably across disciplines, from complete absence in hard sciences to relative frequency in social sciences. This study investigates DQs in literature, focusing on PhD thesis introductions in English. A corpus of 15 introductions tagged for move-and-step genre analysis was used to investigate DQ frequency, their distribution in the rhetorical structure of introductions, and source text types used for DQs. The findings show that (i) DQs are the most common source use practice in the corpus; (ii) DQs are concentrated in three rhetorical steps: reviewing previous research, presenting the analysed literary work, and making topic generalisations; and (iii) source text type used for DQs is associated with specific rhetorical steps. These findings suggest that DQs are essential for the realisation of the rhetorical purpose of the steps which carry them and for knowledge construction in literature PhD theses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00049.ono
2023-03-27
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, Annelie & Gregory Garretson
    2006 Citation practices across the disciplines: The case of proficient student writing. InMaría del Carmen Pérez Llantada Auría, Ramón Plo Alastrué & Claus Peter Neumann (eds.), Academic and professional communication in the 21st century: Genres, rhetoric and the construction of disciplinary knowledge, Proceedings of the 5th International AELFE Conference, 271–280. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Afful, Joseph B. A. & Hilary Janks
    2013 The politics of citation: An analysis of doctoral theses across disciplines. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines6(2). 193–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becher, Tony & Paul R. Trowler
    2001Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, 2nd ed.Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, Vijay K.
    1997 Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes16(3). 181–195. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00039‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Borg, Erik
    2000 Citation practices in academic writing. InPaul Thompson (ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practices, 27–45. Reading: University of Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bunton, David
    1998 Linguistic and textual problems in Ph.D. and M.Phil. theses: An analysis of genre moves and metatext. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2002 Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. InJohn Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 57–75. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2005 The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes4(3). 207–224. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell
    2011 Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes10(3). 140–151. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coffin, Caroline
    2009 Incorporating and evaluating voices in a film studies thesis. Writing & Pedagogy11. 163–193. 10.1558/wap.v1i2.163
    https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i2.163 [Google Scholar]
  11. Docherty, Peter
    2019 An exploratory study in the use of direct quotation by L2 entry level Bachelor students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes401. 26–40. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dudley-Evans, Tony
    1986 Genre analysis: An investigation of introductions and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. InMalcolm Coulthard (ed.), Talking about Text, 128–145. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Friedman, Debra A.
    2019 Citation as a social practice in a TESOL graduate program: A language socialization approach. Journal of Second Language Writing441. 23–36. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gil-Salom, Luz, Carmen Soler-Monreal & María Carbonell-Olivares
    2008 The move-step structure of the introductory sections of Spanish PhD theses. RESLA (Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics)211. 85–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyland, Ken
    2000Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2004Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23927
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kawase, Tomoyuki
    2018 Rhetorical structure of the introduction of applied linguistics PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes311. 18–27. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kushkowski, Jeffrey D., Kathy A. Parsons & William H. Wiese
    2003 Master’s and doctoral thesis citations: Analysis and trends of a longitudinal study. Libraries and the Academy3(3). 459–479. 10.1353/pla.2003.0062
    https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0062 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kwan, Becky
    2006 The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes25(1). 30–55. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Maguiro, Natalia
    2020Citations in interdisciplinary research articles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886086
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886086 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ono, Masumi
    2012 A genre analysis of Japanese and English Ph.D. theses in the field of literature: Macrostructure and introductory chapters. Essex: University of Essex PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2017 Move-step structures of literature Ph.D. theses in the Japanese and UK higher education. Journal of Writing Research8(3). 469–491. 10.17239/jowr‑2017.08.03.03
    https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.03 [Google Scholar]
  23. Paltridge, Brian & Sue Starfield
    2007Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203960813
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960813 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2020 Change and continuity in thesis and dissertation writing: The evolution of an academic genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes481. 1–16. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100910
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100910 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pecorari, Diane
    2006 Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes25(1). 4–29. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Petrić, Bojana
    2007 Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes6(3). 238–253. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2012 Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing21(2). 102–117. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ridley, Diana
    2000 The different guises of a PhD thesis and the roles of a literature review. InPaul Thompson (ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice, 61–75. Reading: University of Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Samraj, Betty
    2008 A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes7(1). 55–67. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2013 Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes12(4). 299–310. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shehzad, Wasima & Akhta Abbas
    2016 Genre analysis of section headings of MPhil theses’ introduction section of linguistics & literature. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry161. 67–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shi, Ling
    2004 Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication21(2). 171–200. 10.1177/0741088303262846
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303262846 [Google Scholar]
  33. Soler-Monreal, Carmen, María Carbonell-Olivares & Luz Gil-Salom
    2011 A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes30(1). 4–17. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Starfield, Sue & Louise J. Ravelli
    2006 “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes5(3). 222–243. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  35. Swales, John M.
    1990Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2004Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tardy, Christine M.
    2009Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson, Paul
    2001 A pedagogically-motivated corpus-based examination of PhD theses: Macrostructure, citation practices and uses of modal verbs. Reading: University of Reading PhD dissertation.
  39. 2005 Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes4(4). 307–323. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2013 Thesis and dissertation writing. InBrian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), The handbook of English for Specific Purposes, 283–299. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2016 Genre approaches to theses and dissertations. InKen Hyland & Philip Shaw (eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes, 379–391. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Verheijen, Lieke
    2015 The language of quoting in academic writing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics4(1). 101–121. 10.1075/dujal.4.1.10ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.4.1.10ver [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00049.ono
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00049.ono
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): direct quotation; genre analysis; introduction; PhD thesis; source use
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error