1887
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Due to prevalence of formal analysis in language education, the implications of Systemic Functional Grammar has largely been ignored by materials and methods of language education. To illustrate the inadequacies of formal analysis and make a case for functional analysis and assessment of writing samples, this study aims at exploring the use of modality in a random sample of expository essays written in an EFL context. To this end, 20 expository essays, written by undergraduate students of English language and literature, were randomly obtained from writing instructors and professors teaching in the English department of Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Iran. Leaners’ use of modality was then analyzed in line with the framework presented by Halliday & Matthiessen (2014). Analysis revealed learners’ lack of variation in the expression of uncertainties and doubts and as such lack of mastery over modality since they tended to express their opinions as implicit and as objective as possible. There seems to be a link between this problem and the dominance of formal analysis in teaching and assessing writing; hence, the findings of this study have clear implications for teaching instruction in this context and other similar contexts, where the implications of systemic functional grammar for language education seem to be ignored.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00050.ost
2023-03-27
2024-03-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aijmer, Karin
    2016 Modality and mood in functional linguistic approaches. InJan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 495–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Axel-Tober, Katrin & Remus Gergel
    2016 Modality and mood in formal syntactic approaches. InJan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 473–494. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boogaart, Ronny & Egbert Fortuin
    2016 Modality and mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammar. InJan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 514–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouhlal, Fatma, Marlise Horst & Juliane Martini
    2018 Modality in ESL textbooks: Insights from a contrastive corpus-based analysis. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes74(2). 227–252. 10.3138/cmlr.3075
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3075 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L. & Suzanne Fleischman
    (eds.) 1995Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols
    (eds.) 1986Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Declerck, Renaat
    2011 The definition of modality. InAdeline Patard & Frank Brisard (eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality, 21–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.29.05dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.29.05dec [Google Scholar]
  8. Fowler, Roger
    1986Linguistic criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ge, Tianshuang
    2015 The use of modal verbs to express hedging in student academic writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics31. 37–46. www.aelinco.es/ojs/index.php/ricl. 10.32714/ricl.03.05
    https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.03.05 [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1970 Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language6(3). 322–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1985An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  13. Heydarnia, Roghayeh & Nader Assadi-Aidinlou
    2015 A comparative study of mood and modality in academic writing: Male vs. female authors of research articles in applied linguistics. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research6(6). 87–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hyland, Ken
    1998Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse
    2004 Meta discourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics25(2). 156–177. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 [Google Scholar]
  16. Karanasiou, Thaleia., & Marina Mattheoudakis
    2017 The expression of epistemic modality in Greek EFL learners’ argumentative essays. (Unpublished M.A. thesis). School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kongpetch, Saowadee & Atikhom Thienthong
    2021 Use of core modal verbs in academic writing of Thai EFL students. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies3(1). 277–291. 10.36892/ijlls.v3i1.509
    https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i1.509 [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, Xuyan & Chunyu Hu
    2015 Epistemic modality in the argumentative essays of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching8(6). 20–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mortelmans, Tanja
    2010 Modality in cognitive linguistics. InDirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 879–889. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nagao, Akiko
    2019 The SFL genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education4(6). 1–18. 10.1186/s40862‑019‑0069‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0069-3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ochs, Elinor
    1996 Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. InJohn J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Olaniyan, Kazeem K. & Adeolu Adeniji
    2015 Modality in statement of objectives in arts-based research article abstracts. British Journal of English Linguistics3(1). 42–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Palmer, Frank. R.
    2001Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  25. Parkinson, Jean
    2020 Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing. Register Studies2(1). 102–130. 10.1075/rs.18012.par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18012.par [Google Scholar]
  26. Qian, Li
    2017 A corpus-based study of modal verbs use in English writing by EFL learners. Canadian Social Science13(11). 31–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Salazar, Danica & Isabel Verdaguer
    2009 Polysemous verbs and modality in native and non-native argumentative writing: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Studies91. 209–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shen, Qian & Yating Tao
    2021 Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLoS ONE16(3). 1–22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247981
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247981 [Google Scholar]
  30. Thompson, Geoff
    2014Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203785270
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270 [Google Scholar]
  31. Vázquez, Ignacio & Diana Giner
    2008 Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses21(21). 171–190. 10.14198/raei.2008.21.10
    https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2008.21.10 [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang, An, Shu-yuan Zheng & Guang-chun Ge
    2015 Epistemic modality in English-median medical research articles: A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes381. 1–10. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.005 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00050.ost
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.00050.ost
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error