1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The November 1997 issue of magazine featured a rather unusual piece by avantgardist John Jesurun, which apparently had surprised even the editors – and this despite having commissioned the contribution themselves. Building on the already troubled conversion from James M. Cain’s 1941 novel to the 1945 film produced by Jerry Wald via multiple screenwriters and many more rewrites, this essay approaches the theme of betrayal so conspicuous in both works less from the narrative angle than from a processual angle inspired by the principle of incommensurability. To this end, it juxtaposes the ‘classical’ adaptation from the Hollywood studio era with Jesurun’s experimental reimagining of the betrayal theme as a homology-based remodelling.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.10.1.01col
2017-06-15
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Noel
    1997Hard Core Road Show: A Screenwriter’s Diary. Toronto: Anansi.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassnett, Susan
    2006 Translating genre. InGenre Matters: Essays in Theory and Criticism, Garin Dowd , Lesley Stevenson & Jeremy Strong (eds). Bristol: Intellect, 85–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Behlmer, Rudy
    1985Inside Warner Bros.: 1935–1951. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beulow, George J
    1990 Originality, genius, plagiarism in English criticism of the eighteenth century. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music21 (2): 117–128. doi: 10.2307/837018
    https://doi.org/10.2307/837018 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boozer, Jack
    2008 The screenplay and authorship in adaptation. InAuthorship in Film Adaptation, Jack Boozer (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bortolotti, Gary R. & Linda Hutcheon
    2007 On the origin of adaptations: Rethinking fidelity discourse and ‘success’ – biologically. New Literary History38: 443–458. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2007.0038
    https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2007.0038 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruhn, Jørgen
    2013 Dialogizing adaptation studies: From one-way transport to a dialogic two-way process. InAdaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn , Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 69–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Collard, Christophe
    2011 Adaptation in transition: A semiology-based assessment of the ‘fidelity’ debate. English Text Construction4 (1): 18–28. doi: 10.1075/etc.4.1.02col
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.4.1.02col [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017 Travelling at the speed of thought: John Jesurun in conversation with Christophe Collard. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art115: 12–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Defays, Daniel
    1997 Numbo: A study in cognition and recognition. InFluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, Douglas Hofstadter (ed.). London: Penguin, 131–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dewey, John
    1979 [1934]Art as Experience. New York: Paragon.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diehl, Karen
    2005 Once upon an adaptation: Traces of the authorial on film. InBooks in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 89–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eco, Umberto
    1986Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eliot, Thomas Stearns
    1921The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. New York: Walter A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1922The Waste Land. New York: Boni & Liverlight..
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elleström, Lars
    2013 Adaptation within the field of media transformations. InAdaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn , Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 113–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Elliott, Kamilla
    2003Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Forbus, Kenneth D
    2001 Exploring analogy in the large. InThe Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Dedre Gentner , Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 23–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Garrett, Greg
    1995 The many faces of Mildred Pierce: A case study of adaptation and the studio system. Literature/Film Quarterly29 (4): 287–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayles, N. Katherine
    2012How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: Chicago University Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Helbo, André
    2006Signes du spectacle: Des arts vivants aux médias. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑6247‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6247-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hirose, Naoya 2002 An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cognitive Systems Research3 (3): 289–299. doi: 10.1016/S1389‑0417(02)00044‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00044-X [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoopes, Roy
    1982Cain. New York: Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hofstadter, Douglas
    2001 Analogy as the core of cognition. InThe Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Dedre Gentner , Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 499–538.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hutcheon, Linda
    2011 Moving forward: The next stage in adaptation studies. InAdaptation and American Studies: Perspectives on Research and Teaching, Nassim Winnie Balestrini (ed.). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 213–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jesurun, John
    1993 Breaking the relentless spool of film unrolling. Felix1 (3): 64–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1997 Mildred Pierce remake/remodel. IndexNovember: 58–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Latour, Bruno
    2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. LaValley, Albert J
    2008Mildred Pierce: A troublesome property to script. InAuthorship in Film Adaptation, Jack Boozer (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 35–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Leitch, Thomas
    2003 Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory. Criticism45 (2): 149–171. doi: 10.1353/crt.2004.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2013 When adaptations go bad. Plenary lecture given at the 8th Annual Conference of the Association of Adaptation Studies (AAS) “Disturbing Adaptations” , Linnaeus University, 27 September 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Moss, Stephen
    2005 A history of plagiarism (not my own work). The Guardian 23November: G2/2.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Murray, Simone
    2012 Materializing adaptation theory. InFilm and Literature: An Introduction and Reader, Timothy Corrigan (ed.). 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 365–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Naremore, James
    2000 Film and the reign of adaptation. InFilm Adaptation, James Naremore (ed.). London: Athlone, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Palmer, R. Barton
    2004 The sociological turn of adaptation studies: The example of film noir . InA Companion to Literature and Film, Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 258–277. doi: 10.1002/9780470999127.ch16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999127.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  36. Peirce, Charles Saunders
    1958Collected PapersVolume 2. C. Harthorne & P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schober, Regina
    2013 Adaptation as connection: Transmediality reconsidered. InAdaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn , Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 89–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schrader, Paul
    2005 Notes on film noir . InFilm Genre Reader III, Barry Keith Grant (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 229–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stam, Robert
    2007 The theory and practice of film adaptation. InLiterature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation, Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Walkenhorst, Birgit
    2005Intermedialität und Wahrnehmung: Untersuchungen zur Regiearbeit von John Jesurun und Robert Lepage. Marburg: Tectum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.10.1.01col
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error