Remodelling homologies

References

1. Baker, Noel
   1997 Hard Core Road Show: A Screenwriter’s Diary. Toronto: Anansi.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bassnett, Susan
   2006 Translating genre. InGenre Matters: Essays in Theory and Criticism, Garin Dowd , Lesley Stevenson & Jeremy Strong (eds). Bristol: Intellect, 85–95.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Behlmer, Rudy
   1985 Inside Warner Bros.: 1935–1951. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beulow, George J
   1990 Originality, genius, plagiarism in English criticism of the eighteenth century. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music21 (2): 117–128. doi: 10.2307/837018
   https://doi.org/10.2307/837018 [Google Scholar]
5. Boozer, Jack
   2008 The screenplay and authorship in adaptation. InAuthorship in Film Adaptation, Jack Boozer (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 1–34.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bortolotti, Gary R. & Linda Hutcheon
   2007 On the origin of adaptations: Rethinking fidelity discourse and ‘success’ – biologically. New Literary History38: 443–458. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2007.0038
   https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2007.0038 [Google Scholar]
7. Bruhn, Jørgen
   2013 Dialogizing adaptation studies: From one-way transport to a dialogic two-way process. InAdaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn , Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 69–88.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Collard, Christophe
   2011 Adaptation in transition: A semiology-based assessment of the ‘fidelity’ debate. English Text Construction4 (1): 18–28. doi: 10.1075/etc.4.1.02col
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.4.1.02col [Google Scholar]
9. Collard, Christophe
   2017 Travelling at the speed of thought: John Jesurun in conversation with Christophe Collard. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art115: 12–23.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Defays, Daniel
    1997 Numbo: A study in cognition and recognition. InFluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, Douglas Hofstadter (ed.). London: Penguin, 131–154.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dewey, John
    1979 [1934] Art as Experience. New York: Paragon.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Diehl, Karen
    2005 Once upon an adaptation: Traces of the authorial on film. InBooks in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 89–124.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eco, Umberto
    1986 Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eliot, Thomas Stearns
    1921 The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. New York: Walter A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eliot, Thomas Stearns
    1922 The Waste Land. New York: Boni & Liverlight..
    [Google Scholar]
16. Elleström, Lars
    2013 Adaptation within the field of media transformations. InAdaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn , Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 113–132.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Elliott, Kamilla
    2003 Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Forbus, Kenneth D
    2001 Exploring analogy in the large. InThe Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Dedre Gentner , Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 23–58.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Garrett, Greg
    1995 The many faces of Mildred Pierce: A case study of adaptation and the studio system. Literature/Film Quarterly29 (4): 287–292.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hayles, N. Katherine
    2012 How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: Chicago University Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Helbo, André
    2006 Signes du spectacle: Des arts vivants aux médias. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑6247‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6247-6 [Google Scholar]
22. Hirose, Naoya
    Hirose, Naoya 2002 An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cognitive Systems Research3 (3): 289–299. doi: 10.1016/S1389‑0417(02)00044‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00044-X [Google Scholar]
23. Hoopes, Roy
    1982 Cain. New York: Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hofstadter, Douglas
    2001 Analogy as the core of cognition. InThe Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Dedre Gentner , Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 499–538.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hutcheon, Linda
    2011 Moving forward: The next stage in adaptation studies. InAdaptation and American Studies: Perspectives on Research and Teaching, Nassim Winnie Balestrini (ed.). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 213–218.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jesurun, John
    1993 Breaking the relentless spool of film unrolling. Felix1 (3): 64–69.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jesurun, John
    1997 Mildred Pierce remake/remodel. IndexNovember: 58–63.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Latour, Bruno
    2005 Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. LaValley, Albert J
    2008  Mildred Pierce: A troublesome property to script. InAuthorship in Film Adaptation, Jack Boozer (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 35–62.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Leitch, Thomas
    2003 Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory. Criticism45 (2): 149–171. doi: 10.1353/crt.2004.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Leitch, Thomas
    2013 When adaptations go bad. Plenary lecture given at the 8th Annual Conference of the Association of Adaptation Studies (AAS) “Disturbing Adaptations” , Linnaeus University, 27 September 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Moss, Stephen
    2005 A history of plagiarism (not my own work). The Guardian 23November: G2/2.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Murray, Simone
    2012 Materializing adaptation theory. InFilm and Literature: An Introduction and Reader, Timothy Corrigan (ed.). 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 365–384.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Naremore, James
    2000 Film and the reign of adaptation. InFilm Adaptation, James Naremore (ed.). London: Athlone, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Palmer, R. Barton
    2004 The sociological turn of adaptation studies: The example of film noir . InA Companion to Literature and Film, Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 258–277. doi: 10.1002/9780470999127.ch16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999127.ch16 [Google Scholar]
36. Peirce, Charles Saunders
    1958 Collected PapersVolume 2. C. Harthorne & P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schober, Regina
    2013 Adaptation as connection: Transmediality reconsidered. InAdaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn , Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 89–112.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Schrader, Paul
    2005 Notes on film noir . InFilm Genre Reader III, Barry Keith Grant (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 229–242.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stam, Robert
    2007 The theory and practice of film adaptation. InLiterature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation, Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Walkenhorst, Birgit
    2005 Intermedialität und Wahrnehmung: Untersuchungen zur Regiearbeit von John Jesurun und Robert Lepage. Marburg: Tectum.
    [Google Scholar]