Multimodal simile

References

1. Ariel, Mira
   1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics24 (1): 65–87. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011567
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567 [Google Scholar]
2. Aristotle
   1960 The Rhetoric of Aristotle. Trans. Lane Cooper . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Buchstaller, Isabelle
   2014 Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Coulson, Seana
   2001 Semantics Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551352
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551352 [Google Scholar]
5. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
   2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
6. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
   2014 Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
   2016 Discourse viewpoint as network. InViewpoint and the Fabric Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools Across Languages and Modalities, Barbara Dancygier , Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 13–40. doi: 10.1515/9783110365467
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467 [Google Scholar]
8. Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
   . Submitted. Internet memes as inter-modal constructions.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dawkins, Richard
   1976 The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fauconnier, Gilles
    Fauconnier, Gilles 1994 Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511624582
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582 [Google Scholar]
11. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1982 Frame semantics. InLinguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 111–137.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
    (eds) 2009 Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
14. Gentner, Dedre & Brian Bowdle
    2001 Convention, form and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol16 (3/4): 222–247. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678896 [Google Scholar]
15. Israel, Michael , Jennifer Riddle Harding & Vera Tobin
    2004 On simile. InLanguage, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI Publications, 123–135.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Moder, Carol
    2008 It’s like making a soup: Metaphors and similes in spoken news discourse. InLanguage in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language, Andrew Tyler , Yiyoung Kim & Maria Takada (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–320.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Moder, Carol
    2010 Two puzzle pieces: Fitting discourse context and constructions into cognitive metaphor theory. English Text Construction3 (2): 294–320. doi: 10.1075/etc.3.2.09mod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.2.09mod [Google Scholar]
18. Pascual, Esther
    2014 Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.47 [Google Scholar]
19. Perelman, Chaim & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1969 The New Rhetoric. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver . Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Romaine, Suzanne & Deborah Lange
    1991 The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech66 (3): 227–279. doi: 10.2307/455799
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455799 [Google Scholar]
21. Shifman, Limor
    2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Siegel, Muffy E.A
    2002  Like: The discourse particle and semantics. Journal of Semantics19 (1): 35–71. doi: 10.1093/jos/19.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/19.1.35 [Google Scholar]
23. Sullivan, Karen
    2013 Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
24. Tagliamonte, Sali & Alex D’Arcy
    2005 When people say, “I was like...”: The quotative system in Canadian youth. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics10 (2): 257–272.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Tannen, Deborah & Anna Marie Trester
    (eds) 2013 Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Vandelanotte, Lieven
    2012 Quotative go and be like: Grammar and grammaticalization. InQuotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid Van Alphen (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 173–202. doi: 10.1075/celcr.15.11van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.11van [Google Scholar]
27. Vandelanotte, Lieven & Kristin Davidse
    2009 The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account. Cognitive linguistics20 (4): 777–807. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2009.032
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.032 [Google Scholar]
28. Wiggins, Bradley E. & G. Bret Bowers
    Wiggins, Bradley E. & G. Bret Bowers 2015 Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society17 (11): 1886–1906. doi: 10.1177/1461444814535194
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194 [Google Scholar]