Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article focuses on an aspect of intensification which has not, so far, received due attention in the extensive literature on the topic: intensifier iteration () and co-occurrence (), with a special focus on Old, Middle and Early Modern English as represented in the York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose and the Penn Parsed Corpora of Historical English. The results show that in earlier English, intensifier iteration is less frequent than co-occurrence; that while the former is clearly associated with emphasis, the latter also intersects with grammaticalization and renewal; and that co-occurrence is particularly salient in periods of instability when the competition of intensifiers is at its height. Iteration and co-occurrence of intensifiers are analysed in this article as cases of the widespread cross-linguistic phenomenon of accretion.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abbott, Edwin A.
    1870A Shakespearian Grammar. London: MacMillan & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson, Sylvia M.
    2000 A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. InPathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, Olga Fischer , Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–66. doi: 10.1075/slcs.53.04ada
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.04ada [Google Scholar]
  3. ARCHER 3.2
    = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registersversion 3.2 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013 Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich. Examples of usage taken from ARCHER were obtained under the terms of the ARCHER User Agreement (available on the Documentation page of the ARCHER website, www.manchester.ac.uk/archer/).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geofrey Leech , Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolinger, Dwight
    1972Degree Words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110877786
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borst, Eugen
    1902Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschungen 10). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
    2016 The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics20 (2): 221–249. doi: 10.1017/S1360674315000428
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000428 [Google Scholar]
  8. BT = Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller 1898An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Buchstaller, Isabelle & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2006The lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb all . English Language and Linguistics10 (2): 345–370. doi: 10.1017/S136067430600195X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067430600195X [Google Scholar]
  10. COCA = Davies, Mark 2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million Words, 1990-present. Available online at corpus.byu.edu/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. D’Arcy, Alexandra
    2015 Stability, stasis and change: The longue dureé of intensification. Diachronica32 (4): 449–493. doi: 10.1075/dia.32.4.01dar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.01dar [Google Scholar]
  12. DOE = The Dictionary of Old English. Available online at doe.utoronto.ca/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fettig, Adolf
    1934Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen (Anglistische Forschungen 79). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox, Hilary E.
    2011 Mind, body, soul, and self in the Alfredian translations. PhD Dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.
  15. Gary, Edward N.
    1979 Extent in English: A unified account of degree and quantity. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  16. Ghesquière, Lobke
    2014The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase: Pathways of Change. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110338751
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338751 [Google Scholar]
  17. González-Díaz, Victorina
    2008English Adjective Comparison: A Historical Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.299
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.299 [Google Scholar]
  18. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
    2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ingersoll, Sheila M.
    1978Intensive and Restrictive Modification in Old English (Anglistische Forschungen 124). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Irvine, Susan
    2014 The Alfredian prefaces and epilogues. InA Companion to Alfred the Great, Nicole Guenter Discenza & Paul E. Szarmach (eds). Leiden: Brill, 143–170. doi: 10.1163/9789004283763_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004283763_007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Irvine, Susan & Malcom Godden
    2012The Old English Boethius with Verse Prologues and Epilogues Associated with King Alfred. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ito, Rika & Sali Tagliamonte
    2003Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society32: 257–279. doi: 10.1017/S0047404503322055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503322055 [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein, Henny
    1998Adverbs of Degree in Dutch and Related Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.21 [Google Scholar]
  24. Koivisto-Alanko, Päivi
    1997 The vocabulary of cognition in early English translations of Boethius from Chaucer to Preston. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen4: 397–414.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kortmann, Bernd
    1997Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110812428
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812428 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuteva, Tania
    2008 On the frills of grammaticalization. InRethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives, María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–217. doi: 10.1075/tsl.76.10kut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.76.10kut [Google Scholar]
  27. Kytö, Merja & Suzanne Romaine
    1997 Competing forms of adjective comparison in Modern English: What could be more quicker and easier and more effective?InTo Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Lena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds). Helsinki: Societé Néophiloloque, 329–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2000 Adjective comparison and standardisation processes in American and British English from 1620 to the present. InThe Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, Laura Wright (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–194. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551758.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551758.011 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lass, Roger
    1999 Phonology and morphology. InThe Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III, 1476–1776, Roger Lass (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lehmann, Christian
    2005 Pleonasm and hypercharacterisation. InYearbook of Morphology 2005, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds). Dordrecht: Springer, 119–154. doi: 10.1007/1‑4020‑4066‑0_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4066-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  32. López-Couso, María José
    2011 Developmental parallels in diachronic and ontogenetic grammaticalization: Existential there as a test case. Folia Linguistica45: 81–102. doi: 10.1515/flin.2011.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2013 Exploring linguistic accretion: Middle English as a testing ground. Plenary lecture delivered at the 8th International Conference on Middle English (ICOME 8) , University of Murcia, 2–4 May 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2014 On structural hypercharacterization: Some examples from the history of English syntax. Plenary lecture delivered at the 18th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 18) , University of Leuven, 14–18 July 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. . Forthcoming. Grammar in context: On the role of hypercharacterization in language change. InGrammar – Discourse – Context: Widening the Horizon for a Theory of Grammatical Change, Kristin Bech & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds) Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lorenz, Gunter
    1999Adjective Intensification – Learners versus Native Speakers: A Corpus Study of Argumentative Writing. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2002Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the lexicalization and grammaticalisation of intensifiers in Modern English. InNew Reflections on Grammaticalization, Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–161. doi: 10.1075/tsl.49.11lor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.11lor [Google Scholar]
  38. Matthews, Peter H.
    2009 On the micro-syntax of attributive adjectives. The Transactions of the Philological Society107 (3): 358–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2009.01228.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2009.01228.x [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014The Positions of Adjectives in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681594.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681594.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. MED = Kurath, Hans & Sherman M. Kuhn 1952–2001Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Available online at ets.umdl.mich.edu/m/med/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Méndez-Naya, Belén
    2003 On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swiþe . English Studies84 (4): 372–391. doi: 10.1076/enst.84.4.372.17388
    https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.84.4.372.17388 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2004Full good, right good, well good? On the competition of intensifiers in the Middle English period. Paper presented at 13 ICEHL , Vienna, August 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2006 Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica27: 141–169. doi: 10.1515/flih.2006.27.1‑2.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2006.27.1-2.141 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2007He nas nat right fat: On the origin and development of the intensifier right . InStudies in Middle English Forms and Meanings, Gabriella Mazzon (ed.). Bern: Peter Lang, 191–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. . Forthcoming. On the role of micro- and macro-level contexts in the configuration of the intensifier system in the Ormulum . InGrammar – Discourse – Context: Widening the Horizon for a Theory of Grammatical Change, Kristin Bech & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds) Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Méndez-Naya, Belén & Päivi Pahta
    2010 Intensifiers in competition: The picture from early English medical writing. InEarly Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191–214. doi: 10.1075/z.160.08men
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.160.08men [Google Scholar]
  47. Mitchell, Bruce
    1985Old English Syntax, Vol. 1 and 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mustanoja, Tauno F.
    1960A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1997 The processes of adverb derivation in late Middle and Early Modern English. InGrammaticalization at Work: Studies of Long-Term Developments in English, Matti Rissanen , Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–190. doi: 10.1515/9783110810745.145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110810745.145 [Google Scholar]
  50. OED = Oxford English Dictionary. Available online at www.oed.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Palacios, Ignacio & Paloma Núñez-Pertejo
    2012He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she is a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text & Talk32 (6): 773–796.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Paradis, Carita
    1997Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2000It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. InCorpora Galore: Analysis and Techniques in Describing English, John Kirk (ed.). Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 147–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2001 Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics12 (1): 47–65. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  55. Partington, Alan
    1993 Corpus evidence of language change: The case of the intensifier. InText and Technology. In honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker , Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–192. doi: 10.1075/z.64.12par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.12par [Google Scholar]
  56. Peltola, Niilo
    1969 Contributions to the study of intensives. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen70: 33–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 1971 Observations on intensification in Old English poetry. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen72: 649–690.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Peters, Hans
    1993Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. PPCEME = Kroch, Anthony , Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs 2004The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME),1st ed. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, release 3. Available online at www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCEME-RELEASE-3
    [Google Scholar]
  60. PPCME2 = Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor 2000The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2), 2nd ed. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, release 4. Available online at www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCME2-RELEASE-4
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Quirk, Randolph , Sydney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Stoffel, Cornelis
    1901Intensives and Downtoners (Anglistische Forschungen 1). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Tagliamonte, Sali & Chris Roberts
    2005 So weird, so cool, so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends . American Speech80 (3): 280–300. doi: 10.1215/00031283‑80‑3‑280
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-80-3-280 [Google Scholar]
  64. YCOE = Taylor, Anthony , Anthony Warner , Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths 2003The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. Electronic texts and manuals available from the Oxford Text Archive.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2008So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics12 (2): 361: 394.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accretion; co-occurrence; grammaticalization; intensifiers; iteration
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error