Stance and engagement in selected Nigerian Supreme Court judgments

References

1. Agaba, James
   2015 Practical Approach to Criminal Litigation in Nigeria (3rd ed.). Lagos: Nelag Company Limited.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Asein, John
   2005 Introduction to Nigerian Legal System. Lagos: Ababa Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bhatia, Vijay
   1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
   2009 Register, Genre and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
   1989 Styles of stance in English lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text9(1): 93–124.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Breeze, Ruth
   2013 Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(2): 229–253. 10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre [Google Scholar]
7. Breeze, Ruth
   2018 Giving voice to the law. Speech act verbs in legal academic writing. InPhraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings: A Corpus-based Interdisciplinary Perspective, Goźdź-Roszkowski Stanisław & Pontrandolfo Gianluca (eds). London: Routledge, 221–239.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
   2005 Stance expressions in the courtroom. English Language and Linguistics21(2): 41–59. 10.17960/ell.2015.21.2.003
   https://doi.org/10.17960/ell.2015.21.2.003 [Google Scholar]
9. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
   2017 Evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements. Folia Linguistica51(1): 103–132. 10.1515/flin‑2017‑0003
   https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
10. Daniel, Florence Oluwaseyi
    2021 A genre analysis of selected substance-based judgments of the Nigerian Supreme Court. Covenant Journal of Language Studies9(1): 55–70.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daniel, Florence Oluwaseyi & Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
    (2020) The generic structure of procedure-based Nigerian Supreme Court judgments. JESAN22(2): 143–159.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Du Bois, John
    2007 The stance triangle. InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation and Interaction, Englebretson Robert (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–182. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
13. Federal Judicial Centre
    Federal Judicial Centre 2013 Judicial writing manual: A pocket guide for judges (2nd ed.).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Feteris, Eveline
    1999 Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions (2nd ed.). Netherlands: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9219‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2 [Google Scholar]
15. Feteris, Eveline
    2016 Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of legal decision. Argumentation29(3): 61–79. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9376‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9376-0 [Google Scholar]
16. Finegan, Edward
    2010 Corpus linguistics approaches to ‘legal language’: Adverbial expression of attitude and emphasis in Supreme Court opinions. InThe Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, Coulthard Malcom & Johnson Alison (eds). London: Routledge, 65–77.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanislaw
    2019 ‘It’s not just a fact that the law requires this, but it is a reasonable fact: Using the Noun that-pattern to explore stance construction in legal writing. InCorpus-based Research on Variation English Legal Discourse, Fanego Teresa & Rodríguez-Puente Paula (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–146. 10.1075/scl.91.06goz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91.06goz [Google Scholar]
18. Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
    2013 Evaluative patterns in judicial discourse: A corpus-based phraseological perspective on American and Italian criminal judgments. International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse13(2): 9–69.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
    2014 Facing the facts: Evaluative patterns in English and Italian judicial language. InLanguage and Law in Professional Discourse: Issues and Perspectives, Guliana Garzone, Salvi Rita, Tessuto Girolamo, Williams Christopher, & Bhatia Vijay (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar, 10–28.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca
    (eds) 2018 Phraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings. A Corpus-based Interdisciplinary Perspective. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heffer, Chris
    2007 Judgment in court: Evaluating participants in courtroom discourse. InLanguage and the Law: International Outlooks, Kredens Krzysztof & Goźdź-Roszkowski Stanisław (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 45–179.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hyland, Ken
    (2004) Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing13, 133-151. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies7(2): 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
24. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hyland, Ken
    2008 Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies8(2): 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hyland, Ken
    2010 Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies9(2): 125–143. 10.35360/njes.220
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220 [Google Scholar]
27. Hyland, Ken
    2011 Disciplines and discourses: Social interactions in the construction of knowledge. InWriting in the Knowledge Society, Starke-Meyerring, Doreen & Pare, Anthony & Artemeva, Natasha & Horne, Miriam & Yousoubova, Larissa (eds). West Lafayette: Parlor Press, 193–214. 10.37514/PER‑B.2011.2379.2.10
    https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2011.2379.2.10 [Google Scholar]
28. Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly
    2004 Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics (25)2: 156–177. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 [Google Scholar]
29. Hunston, Susan. & Thompson, Geoffery
    (eds) 2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ivanic, Roz
    1998 Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 [Google Scholar]
31. Kalejaiye, Abiola Sakirat
    2016 A linguistic analysis of selected Nigerian appellate court judgments. PhD dissertation, Babcock University.
32. Keramati, Rezaei Shirin, Kuhi Davud, & Saeidi Mahnaz
    2019 Cross-sectional diachronic corpus analysis of stance and engagement markers in three leading journals of Applied Linguistics. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies6(2): 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kurzon, Dennis
    2001 The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics33(1): 61–85. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00123‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00123-X [Google Scholar]
34. Leubsdorf, John
    2001 The structure of judicial opinions. Minnesota Law Review86(447): 447–496.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Martin, James & White, Peter
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
36. Mazzi, Davide
    2010 ‘This argument fails for two reasons…’: A linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US Supreme Court judgments. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law23(4): 373–385. 10.1007/s11196‑010‑9162‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9162-0 [Google Scholar]
37. Mazzi, Davide
    2014 ‘The words are plain and clear…’: On interpersonal positioning in the discourse of judicial interpretation. InInterpersonality in Legal Genres, Breeze Ruth, Gotti Maurizio, & Guinda Carmen Sancho (eds). Switzerland: Peter Lang, 39–62.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ogunsiji, Ayotunde. & Olaosun Ibrahim
    2012 Pragmatic acts in court-rulings: A case of Nigeria’s Supreme Court judgement on Obi versus Uba. Papers in English and Linguistics168–181.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sanni, Oluwole Oluwatobi
    2016 The role of forensic linguistics in courtroom cross examination. Ife Studies in English12(2): 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Solan, Lawrence
    1993 The Language of Judges. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226767895.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226767895.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
41. Szczyrbak, Magdalena
    2014 Stancetaking strategies in judicial discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court opinions. Studia Linguistica Iagellonicae Cracoviensis131: 91–120.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tracy, Hodge & Hodge, Danielle
    2018 Judge discourse moves that enact and endanger procedural justice. Discourse and Society29(1): 63–85. 10.1177/0957926517726112
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726112 [Google Scholar]
43. Vazquez-Orta, Ignacio
    2013 Authoritative intervention in legal discourse: A genre-based study of judgements and arbitration awards. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada91–104.
    [Google Scholar]