1887
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Suspense as an aesthetic effect is a key narrative strategy of thriller movies, serving the function of entertainment for wide audiences. As the plot unfolds, arcs of suspense rely on triggering an appealing sense of anticipation that calls for a resolution. The present study examines the creation of suspense throughout fictional dialogue in Quentin Tarantino’s popular feature films (1994), (2009), and (2012). In these movies, dialogic interaction is often dominated by eloquent villains who skilfully flout the conversational maxims of Grice’s cooperative principle, thereby exercising verbal power over other interlocutors. As is demonstrated in a qualitative pragma-stylistic framework, the villains’ discursive strategies amount to stylistic deviation resulting in suspenseful implicatures. In particular, suspense is commonly caused by digressing from current topics, by giving too little information or too many details, by being insincere or ironic, and by making equivocal or redundant statements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.22022.sch
2024-02-29
2024-10-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Tarantino, Quentin
    (dir.) 1994Pulp Fiction. Los Angeles, CA: Miramax Films.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (dir.) 2009Inglourious Basterds. Universal City, CA: Universal Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (dir.) 2012Django Unchained. Culver City, CA: Columbia Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anastasova, Maria
    2019Suspense of horror and the horror of suspense. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Austin, John L.
    1975How to do things with words, 2nd edn.byJames O. Urmson & Marina Sbisà. Oxford: Clarendon. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Banaji, Ferzina
    2013 The Nazi killin’ business: A postmodern pastiche of the holocaust. InAxel Bangert, Robert S. C. Gordon & Libby Saxton (eds.), Holocaust intersections: Genocide and visual culture at the new millennium, 98–111. Oxford: Legenda. 10.4324/9781315092928
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092928 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bednarek, Monika
    2023Language and characterisation in television series: A corpus-informed approach to the construction of social identity in the media. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.106
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.106 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett, Andrew & Nicholas Royle
    2016An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, 5th edn.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315652450
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652450 [Google Scholar]
  9. Black, Elizabeth
    2006Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bubel, Claudia M.
    2008 Film audiences as overhearers. Journal of Pragmatics40(1). 55–71. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Busse, Beatrix
    2017 Pragmatics of style in fiction. InMiriam A. Locher & Andreas Jucker (eds.), Pragmatics of fiction, 197–231. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431094‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094-007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chapman, Siobhan
    2014 “Oh, do let’s talk about something else-”: What is not said and what is implicated in Elizabeth Bowen’s The Last September. InSiobhan Chapman & Billy Clark (eds.), Pragmatic literary stylistics, 36–54. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137023278_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023278_3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chapman, Siobhan & Billy Clark
    2014 Introduction: Pragmatic literary stylistics. InSiobhan Chapman & Billy Clark (eds.), Pragmatic literary stylistics, 1–15. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137023278_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023278_1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Comisky, Paul & Jennings Bryant
    1982 Factors involved in generating suspense. Human Communication Research9(1). 49–58. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1982.tb00682.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00682.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, Bethan L.
    2007 Grice’s cooperative principle: Meaning and rationality. Journal of Pragmatics39(12). 2308–2331. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutta-Flanders, Reshmi
    2017The language of suspense in crime fiction: A linguistic stylistic approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑47028‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47028-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fill, Alwin
    2003Das Prinzip Spannung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Betrachtungen zu einem universalen Phänomen [The principle of suspense: Linguistic perspectives on a universal phenomenon]. Tübingen: Narr. 10.1515/infodaf‑2005‑2‑326
    https://doi.org/10.1515/infodaf-2005-2-326 [Google Scholar]
  18. Grice, Herbert Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, Yan
    2012 Relevance and neo-Gricean pragmatic principles. InHans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics, 25–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214215.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.25 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Janney, Richard W.
    2012 Pragmatics and cinematic discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics8(1). 85–113. 10.1515/lpp‑2012‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeffries, Lesley & Dan McIntyre
    2010Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511762949
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762949 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kozloff, Sarah
    2000Overhearing film dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lambrou, Marina
    2014 Stylistics, conversation analysis and the cooperative principle. InMichael Burke (ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics, 136–154. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315795331.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795331.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Langlotz, Andreas
    2017 Language and emotion in fiction. InMiriam A. Locher & Andreas Jucker (eds.), Pragmatics of fiction, 515–552. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431094‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094-017 [Google Scholar]
  26. Leech, Geoffrey
    2008Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315846125
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846125 [Google Scholar]
  27. Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short
    1981Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehmann, Hauke
    2020Affect poetics of the New Hollywood: Suspense, paranoia, and melancholy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110580761
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580761 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lehne, Moritz & Stefan Koelsch
    2015 Towards a general psychological model of tension and suspense. Frontiers in Psychology61. 1–11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00079
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00079 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lumsden, David
    2008 Kinds of conversational cooperation. Journal of Pragmatics40(11). 1896–1908. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  31. McIntyre, Dan
    2010 Dialogue and characterization in Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs: A corpus stylistic analysis. InDan McIntyre & Beatrix Busse (eds.), Language and style, 162–182. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑06574‑2_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06574-2_11 [Google Scholar]
  32. Messerli, Thomas
    2017 Participation structure in fictional discourse: Authors, scriptwriters, audiences and characters. InMiriam A. Locher & Andreas Jucker (eds. (eds.), Pragmatics of fiction, 25–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431094‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431094-002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nathan, Ian
    2019Quentin Tarantino: The iconic filmmaker and his work. London: White Lion Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Piazza, Roberta
    2011 Pragmatic deviance in realist horror films: A look at films by Argento and Fincher. InRoberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 85–104. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.07pia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.07pia [Google Scholar]
  35. Schubert, Christoph
    2020 The visual discourse of shots and cuts: Applying the cooperative principle to horror film cinematography. InChristian R. Hoffmann & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), Telecinematic stylistics, 183–204. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350042889.0014
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350042889.0014 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2023 Suspense in film dialogue: Screening Quentin Tarantino’s The Hateful Eight. InChristoph Schubert & Valentin Werner (eds.), Stylistic approaches to pop culture, 109–129. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003147718‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003147718-6 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shone, Tom
    2017Tarantino: A retrospective. New York: Pocket Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Škifić, Sanja & Rajko Petković
    2014 Stylistic and linguistic creation of suspense in Quentin Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs. InSusanne M. Cadera & Anita Pavić Pintarić (eds.), The voices of suspense and their translation in thrillers, 47–60. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401210690_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210690_005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vogel, Laura
    2021Der Tisch als Bühne: Inszenierungsformen filmischer Tischgesellschaften und gastrosophischer Codes am Beispiel der Filmästhetik Quentin Tarantinos [The table as stage: Forms of staging filmic dinner parties and gastrosophical codes exemplified by Quentin Tarantino’s film aesthetics]. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Vorderer, Peter & Silvia Knobloch
    2000 Conflict and suspense in drama. InDolf Zillmann & Peter Vorderer (eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal, 59–72. Mahwah: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410604811
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604811 [Google Scholar]
  41. Werner, Valentin
    2021 Text-linguistic analysis of performed language: Revisiting and re-modeling Koch and Oesterreicher. Linguistics59(3). 541–575. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0036 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2022 Pop cultural linguistics. InMark Aronoff (ed.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.999
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.999 [Google Scholar]
  43. Werner, Valentin & Christoph Schubert
    2023 Zooming in: Stylistic approaches to pop culture. InChristoph Schubert & Valentin Werner (eds), Stylistic approaches to pop culture, 1–19. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003147718‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003147718-1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wulff, Hans J.
    1996 Suspense and the influence of cataphora on viewers’ expectations. InPeter Vorderer, Hans J. Wulff & Mike Friedrichsen (eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations, 1–17. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203811252
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203811252 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.22022.sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.22022.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversational maxims; cooperative principle; film dialogue; implicature; suspense
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error