oa The thematic organization of consumer safety instructions in English

References

1. Berry, Margaret
   1995 Thematic options and success in writing. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 55–84.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Berry, Margaret, Geoff Thompson & Hilary Hillier
   2014 Theme and variations. InMaria Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco González-Garcia & Angela Downing (eds.) Theory and practice in Functional-Cognitive space. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 107–126. 10.1075/sfsl.68.05ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.05ber [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
4. Carroll, Tessa & Judy Delin
   1998 Written instructions in Japanese and English: a comparative analysis. Pragmatics8(3). 339–385.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Christobalena Frutos, Araceli
   2018 Corpus-rhetorical analysis of the sub-genre of instruction manuals for household appliances. Ibérica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes361. 143–170.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ciliberti, Anna
   1990 Instructions for use: A macrotextual and stylistic analysis. InMichael A. K. Halliday, John Gibbons & Howard Nicholas (eds.) Learning, keeping and using language. Vol.II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 299–313. 10.1075/z.lkul2.23cil
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.lkul2.23cil [Google Scholar]
7. Corbett, John
   2009 Theme, field and genre: thematic realisations in academic articles and their popularisations. InGail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture. London: Equinox. 70–93.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cornelissen, Pieter A., Joris van Hoof, & Mark van Vuuren
   2014 Enabling employees to work safely: the influence of motivation and ability in the design of safety instructions. Technical Communication61(4). 232–244.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crompton, Peter
   2004 Theme in discourse. ‘Thematic progression’ and ‘method of development’ re-evaluated. Functions of Language11(2). 213–249. 10.1075/fol.11.2.04cro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.11.2.04cro [Google Scholar]
10. Cummings, Michael
    2003 The role of Theme and Rheme in contrasting methods of organization of texts. InChristopher Butler (ed.), Dynamics of language use: Functional and contrastive perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 129–154.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daneš, František
    1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. InFrantišek Daneš (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective. The Hague: Mouton. 106–128. 10.1515/9783111676524.106
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111676524.106 [Google Scholar]
12. Domínguez, Mónica, Juan Soler-Company & Leo Wanner
    2020 ThemePro: A toolkit for the analysis of thematic progression. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Marseille: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). 1000–1007.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Downing, Angela
    1991 An alternative approach to Theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word421. 119–143. 10.1080/00437956.1991.11435835
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1991.11435835 [Google Scholar]
14. Dubois, Betty Lou
    1987 A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text21. 89–116.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eggins, Suzanne
    2004 An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Elgemark, Anna
    2017 To the very end. A contrastive study of N-Rhemes in English and Swedish translations. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Enkvist, Nils Erik
    1974 Theme dynamics and style: an experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia51. 127–135.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fetzer, Anita
    2008 Theme zones in English media discourse: forms and functions. Journal of Pragmatics401. 1543–1568. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.016 [Google Scholar]
19. Fries, Peter. H.
    1983 On the status of Theme in English: arguments from discourse. InJános S. Petöfi & Emel Sözer (eds.), Micro and macro connexity of texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. 116–152.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fries, Peter. H.
    1993 Information flow in written advertising. InJames Alatis (ed.), Language, communication and social meaning. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 336–352.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fries, Peter H.
    1995a A personal view of Theme. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fries, Peter H.
    1995b Patterns of information in initial position in English. InPeter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic Functional perspectives. Norwood: Ablex. 47–65.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fries, Peter H.
    2002 The flow of information in a written English text. InPeter H. Fries, Michael Cummings, David Lockwood & William Spruiell (eds.) Relations and functions within and around language. London: Continuum. 117–155.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fries, Peter H.
    2008 The textual metafunction as a site for a discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. InGail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture. London: Equinox. 8–44.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fries, Peter H. & Gill Francis
    1992 Exploring Theme: problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics61. 45–49.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ghadessy, Mohsen
    1995 Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 129–146.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gómez González, Maria. A.
    2001 The Theme-topic interface. Evidence from English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.71 [Google Scholar]
28. Gómez González, Maria. A. & Ana P. García Varela
    2014 Discourse-organizational patterns in English and Spanish. Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada27(1). 87–117. 10.1075/resla.27.1.04gom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.04gom [Google Scholar]
29. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
30. Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1978 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hawes, Thomas
    2015 Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand21. 93–100. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002 [Google Scholar]
32. Herriman, Jennifer
    2011 N-rhemes in English problem-solution texts. English Text Construction4(1). 29–53. 10.1075/etc.4.1.03her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.4.1.03her [Google Scholar]
33. Hyland, Ken
    2002 Directives: arguments and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics23(2). 215–239. 10.1093/applin/23.2.215
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215 [Google Scholar]
34. Kizil, Marina & Elina Kushch
    2019 Thematic progression and its types in English literary and legislative texts. Advanced Education121. 181–187. 10.20535/2410‑8286.142658
    https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.142658 [Google Scholar]
35. Liu, Lijin. & Gordon Tucker
    2015 Thematic choice and progression in English and Chinese radio news. Text and Talk35(4). 481–504. 10.1515/text‑2015‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
36. Martin, J. R.
    1992 English text. System and structure. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
37. Martin, J. R. & David Rose
    2007 Working with discourse. 2nd edn.London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Matthiessen, Christian
    1995 THEME as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’ construction. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. Pinter: London. 20–47.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mauranen, Anna
    1993 Theme and progression in written discourse. InMona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology. Philadelphia: Amsterdam. 95–114. 10.1075/z.64.07mau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.07mau [Google Scholar]
40. Mehlenbacher, Brad, Michael Wogalter & Kenneth Laughery
    2002 On reading the product owner’s manuals: perceptions and product complexity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. (46)61. 730–734. 10.1177/154193120204600610
    https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120204600610 [Google Scholar]
41. Nwogu, Kevin. & Thomas Bloor
    1991 Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. InEija Ventola (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Approaches and uses. Berlin: Mouton. 369–384. 10.1515/9783110883527.369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883527.369 [Google Scholar]
42. Paris, Cecile & Donia Scott
    1994 Stylistic Variation in Multilingual Instructions. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Kennebunkport, Maine. 45–52. 10.3115/1641417.1641423
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1641417.1641423 [Google Scholar]
43. Ping, Leong Alvin
    2005 Talking themes: the thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies7(6). 701–732. 10.1177/1461445605055423
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605055423 [Google Scholar]
44. Ping, Leong Alvin
    2015 Topical themes and thematic progression: the “picture” of research articles. Text & Talk35(3). 289–315.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Povolná, Renata
    2018 On some persuasive strategies in technical discourse: cross-cultural analysis of directives in English and Czech technical manuals. Topics in Linguistics19(2). 72–85. 10.2478/topling‑2018‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2018-0011 [Google Scholar]
46. Sager, Juan, David Dungworth & Peter McDonald
    1980 English special languages. Principles and practice in science and technology. Wiesbaden: Oscar Brandstetter Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sharpe, Michael
    2014 Language forms and rhetorical functions in technical instructions. English for Specific Purposes World. 15(43). 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Schubert, Christoph
    2016 Cohesion in contrast: A case study of English and German user manuals. SKY Journal of Linguistics291. 95–117.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Trimble, Louis
    1985 English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
    2006 Collaborating towards coherence. Lexical cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.146
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.146 [Google Scholar]
51. Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson
    2009 Theme, subject and the unfolding text. InGail Forey, & Geoff Thompson (eds.) Text type and texture. London: Equinox. 45–69.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Whittaker, Rachel
    1995 Theme, processes and the realization of meanings in academic articles. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 105–128.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Wright, Patricia, Patricia Crighton & S. M. Threlfall
    1982 Some factors determining when instructions will be read. Ergonomics25(3). 225–237. 10.1080/00140138208924943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138208924943 [Google Scholar]
54. Xiao, Qun
    1991 Toward thematic selection in different genre: Fables and recipes. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]