1887
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Discourse competence is crucial in constructing a unified text (Canale 1983). However, while the importance of discourse competence in written discourse has been emphasized, studies of effects of specific features of discourse competence on the quality of a text have been neglected (Purpura 2008). Moreover, little research has used a Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) approach to analyze cohesion and coherence features in writing discourse. Therefore, this study employed an SFL approach to examine how cohesion and coherence features were used in 45 non-native academic written responses across proficiency levels. The study aimed to provide an insight into learners’ second language discourse competence development. The analyses from four multinomial logistic regressions suggested that comparative conjunctions, accurate use of referential expressions, lexical cohesion, and theme-rheme patterns provided useful insights into learner discourse competence progression. The study has implications for teaching academic writing and for developing a rating scale for a writing assessment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.23017.vo
2025-10-16
2025-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banerjee, Jayanti, Florencia Franceschina & Anne Smith
    2004Documenting features of written language production typical at different IELTS band score levels. IELTS Research Report No. 7, the British Council/University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor
    2004The functional analysis of English. London: Hodder Education. 10.4324/9780203774854
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774854 [Google Scholar]
  3. Canale, Michael
    1983 On some dimensions of language proficiency. InJ. Oller. (ed.), Issues in language testing research, 333–342. Newbury: Newbury House Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Canale, Michael & Merrill Swain
    1980 Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics1(1). 1–47. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cumming, Alister, Robert Kantor, Kyoko Baba, Usman Erdosy, Keanre Eouanzoui & Mark James
    2005 Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing10(1). 5–43. 10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Daneš, František
    1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. InF. Daneš (eds.), Papers in functional sentence perspective, 106–128. Prague: Academia. 10.1515/9783111676524.106
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111676524.106 [Google Scholar]
  7. De Beaugrande, Robert & Wolfgang Dressler
    1981Introduction to text linguistics. London & New York: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
  8. Enkvist, N. E.
    1974 Theme dynamics and style: An experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia51. 127–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fawcett, Robin
    2008Invitation to systemic functional linguistics: The Cardiff grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday’s systemic functional grammar. London & Oakville: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fries, Peter
    1994 On theme, rheme and discourse goals. InM. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 229–249. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1995 Themes, method of development and text. InR. Hasan & P. H. Fries (eds.), On subject and theme: From the perspective of functions in discourse, 45–56. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.118.10fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.118.10fri [Google Scholar]
  12. Gómez, Maria
    1994 The relevance of Theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports. Word45(3). 293–305. 10.1080/00437956.1994.11435929
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1994.11435929 [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, Michael
    1994An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. London & New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawes, Thomas & Sarah Thomas
    1996 Rhetorical uses of theme in newspaper editorials. World Englishes15(2). 159–170. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1996.tb00102.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00102.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, Guowen
    2017 Theme in the Cardiff grammar. InT. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 163–176. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ISU EPT Corpus of Learner Writing
    ISU EPT Corpus of Learner Writing 2012 Corpus compiled by the Applied Linguistics and Technology program at Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Iwashita, Noriko & Claudia Vasquez
    2015An examination of discourse competence at different proficiency levels in IELTS speaking part 2. British Council: Cambridge English Language Assessment, and IDP: IELTS Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kennedy, Christopher & Dilys Thorp
    2002A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, Icy
    2002 Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing11(2). 135–159. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(02)00065‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00065-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, J.
    1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin, J. & David Rose
    2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mayor, Barbara, Ann Hewings, Sarah North, Joan Swan & Caroline Coffin
    2007 A linguistic analysis of Chinese and Greek L1 scripts for IELTS academic writing task 2. InL. Taylor & P. Falvey (eds.), Studies in language testing, 19: IELTS collected papers, 2: Research in speaking and writing assessment, 250–315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Medve, Vesna Bagarić & Višnja Pavičić Takač
    2013 The influence of cohesion and coherence on text quality: A cross-linguistic study of foreign language learners’ written production. InE. Piechurska-Kuciel & E. Szymanska-Czaplak (eds.), Language in cognition and affect, 111-131. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mellos, Vickie
    2011 Coherence in English as a second language undergraduate writing: A theme-rheme analysis (Unpublished M.A. thesis). San Diego State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Morgan, George, Nancy Leech, Gene Gloeckner & Karen Barrett
    2011IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (4th ed.). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203842966
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842966 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nvivo
  29. Okta, Zefki, Ashadi Ashadi, Sulis Triyono & Dwiyanto Djoko Pranowo
    2023 Thematic structure in students’ writings: Implications on their ideas organization and development. Register Journal16(1). 49–72. 10.18326/register.v16i1.49‑72
    https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72 [Google Scholar]
  30. Paltridge, Brian
    2021Discourse analysis: An introduction (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Purpura, James
    2008 Assessing communicative language ability: Models and their components. InE. Shonany & N. Hornberger (eds.), Language testing and assessment: Encyclopedia of language and education volume 7, 5–68. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wei, Jing
    2013 Corpus-based research on the development of theme choices in Chinese learners' English speech. Journal of Education and Practice4(16). 38–45.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.23017.vo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.23017.vo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): academic writing; discourse analysis; discourse competence; mixed-methods approach; SFL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error