1887
image of ‘I want the text to still be me’

Abstract

Abstract

This study foregrounds the potential impact of ChatGPT usage on second language (L2) learners’ voice. L2 learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s interference with their self-representation in writing and the relationship of these perceptions with future intentions to use ChatGPT are investigated. Following a mixed-methods approach, questionnaire data from undergraduate students ( = 162) after two English for academic purposes courses, where they used ChatGPT as L2 academic writing support, were collected and analysed. About half of the participants were ambivalent; the remaining half were divided equally in their perceptions of ChatGPT as (not) a threat. The more threatening ChatGPT was perceived to be, the less inclined participants were to use it again. Ambivalence is influenced by usage, genre and GenAI advancements. Over-reliance, homogenisation and devaluation of human voice relate to the perception of? ChatGPT as a threat. A lack of perceived threat derives from ChatGPT’s mechanical voice, human agency, and different standards for acceptable convergence.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25001.pre
2026-01-20
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/etc.25001.pre/etc.25001.pre.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25001.pre&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AlAfnan, Mohammed Alwad & Siti Fatimah MohdZuki
    2023 Do artificial intelligence chatbots have a writing style? An investigation into the stylistic features of ChatGPT-4. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology(). –. 10.37965/jait.2023.0267
    https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0267 [Google Scholar]
  2. Almansour, Noha
    2024 Investigating factors influencing EFL learners’ behavioral intentions to adopt ChatGPT for language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. (). . 10.17507/jltr.1506.16
    https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.16 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrot, Jessie S.
    2024 Leveraging ChatGPT in the writing classroom: Theoretical and practical insights. Language Teaching Research Quarterly. –. 10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.03
    https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.03 [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke
    2006 Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. (). –. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryant, Lizbeth A.
    2005Voice as process. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crosthwaite, Peter, Sulistya Ningrum & Icy Lee
    2022 Research trends in L2 written corrective feedback: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of Scopus-indexed research on L2 WCF. Journal of Second Language Writing. . 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934 [Google Scholar]
  7. Darvishi, Ali, Hassan Khosravi, Shazia Sadiq, Dragan Gašević & George Siemens
    2024 Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers and Education. . 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967 [Google Scholar]
  8. Derakhshan, Ali & Farhad Ghiasvand
    2024 Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research-active EFL teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. (). 10.1111/ijal.12561
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12561 [Google Scholar]
  9. Doshi, Anil R. & Oliver P. Hauser
    2024 Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances(). . 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dragojevic, Marko, Jessica Gasiorek & Howard Giles
    2016 Accommodative strategies as core of the theory. InHoward Giles (ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316226537.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Escalante, Juan, Austin Pack & Alex Barrett
    2023 AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education(). . 10.1186/s41239‑023‑00425‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Giles, Howard, America L. Edwards & Joseph B. Walther
    2023 Communication accommodation theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects. Language Sciences. . 10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamat, Afendi
    2024 The language of AI and human poetry: A comparative lexicometric study. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature(). –. 10.17576/3L‑2024‑3002‑01
    https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3002-01 [Google Scholar]
  14. Han, Jining & Mimi Li
    2024 Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context. System. . 10.1016/j.system.2024.103502
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103502 [Google Scholar]
  15. Henderson, Michael, Tracii Ryan & Michael Phillips
    2019 The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education(). –. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815 [Google Scholar]
  16. Holyoak, Keith J.
    2024 Why I am not a Turing machine. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, –. 10.1080/20445911.2024.2395573
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2024.2395573 [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, Xinyi, Di Zou, Gary Cheng, Xieling Chen & Haoran Xie
    2023 Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society(). –. 10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009
    https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hyland, Ken
    2008 Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching(). –. 10.1017/S0261444808005235
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005235 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009406512
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009406512 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2015 Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ivanič, Roz
    1998Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacob, Sharin R., Tamara Tate & Mark Warschauer
    2023 Emergent AI-assisted discourse: Case study of a second language writer authoring with ChatGPT. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning(). –. 10.1515/jccall‑2024‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2024-0011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Koltovskaia, Svetlana, Payam Rahmati & Hooman Saeli
    2024 Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing. . 10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kubota, Ryuko
    2023 Another contradiction in AI-assisted second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. . 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101069
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101069 [Google Scholar]
  25. Levine, Sarah, Sarah W. Beck, Chris Mah, Lena Phalen & Jaylen Pittman
    2024 How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy(). –. 10.1002/jaal.1373
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373 [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Belle, Victoria L. Lowell, Chaoran Wang & Xiangning Li
    2024 A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, . 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266 [Google Scholar]
  27. Little, David, Leni Dam & Lienhard Legenhausen
    2017 Language learner autonomy: What, why and how. Second Language Acquisition(). –. 10.2307/jj.22730480
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.22730480 [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, Yanhua, Jaeuk Park & Sean McMinn
    2024 Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: Students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics(). –. 10.1111/ijal.12574
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12574 [Google Scholar]
  29. Markey, Ben, David W. Brown, Michael Laudenbach & Alan Kohler
    2024 Dense and disconnected: Analyzing the dedimented style of ChatGPT-generated text at scale. Written Communication(). –. 10.1177/07410883241263528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883241263528 [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsuda, Paul K.
    2015 Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. –. 10.1017/S0267190514000178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000178 [Google Scholar]
  31. Meyer, Craig A.
    2023 Generative AI: The voice of the other. Double Helix. –. 10.37514/DBH‑J.2023.11.1.05
    https://doi.org/10.37514/DBH-J.2023.11.1.05 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nguyen, Huu Huang
    2025 ChatGPT-assisted language learning: Effects on Vietnamese English majors’ writing skills and motivation. The JALT CALL Journal(). . 10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102429
    https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102429 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nieminen, Juuso Henrik & David Carless
    2023 Feedback literacy: A critical review of an emerging concept. Higher Education. –. 10.1007/s10734‑022‑00895‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00895-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Petrić, Bojana
    2010 Students’ Conceptions of Voice in Academic Writing. InEnrique Lafuente-Millan, Rosa Lores-Sanz & Pilar Mur-Duenas (eds.), Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic genres, –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pretorius, Marilize
    2024 On knowing what you do (not) know: Implications for training nurses to be competent accommodators. Communication & Medicine. (). –. 10.1558/cam.26707
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.26707 [Google Scholar]
  36. Prior, Paul
    2001 Voices in text, mind, and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing. –. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(00)00037‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00037-0 [Google Scholar]
  37. Qi, Qi & Cecilia G. Zhao
    2023 Discoursal scholarly identity in research writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. . 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101052
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101052 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rahman, Md Shahinur, Md Mahiuddin Sabbir, Jing Zhang, Iqbal H. Moral & Gazi M. S. Hossain
    2023 Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology(). –. 10.14742/ajet.8956
    https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8956 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramanathan, Vai & Dwight Atkinson
    1999 Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. –. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(99)80112‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X [Google Scholar]
  40. Rudolph, Jürgen, Samson Tan & Shannon Tan
    2023 ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching(). –. 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sardinha, Tony B.
    2024 AI-generated vs human-authored texts: A multidimensional comparison. Applied Corpus Linguistics(). . 10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100083
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100083 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmidt-Fajlik, Ronald
    (2023) ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal(). –. 10.54855/acoj.231417
    https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.231417 [Google Scholar]
  43. Steiss, Jacob, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham, Jazmin Cruz, Michael Hebert, Jiali Wang, Youngson Moon, Waverly Tseng, Mark Warschauer & Carol Booth Olson
    2024 Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction. . 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tajfel, Henri & John C. Turner
    1986 The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. InStephen Worchel & William G. Austin (eds), Psychology of intergroup relations, –. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tardy, Christine M.
    2012 Current conceptions of voice. InKen Hyland & Carmen Sancho Guinda (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres, –. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137030825_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_3 [Google Scholar]
  46. Teng, Mark F.
    2024 A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies(). –. 10.58304/ijts.20240304
    https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304 [Google Scholar]
  47. Warschauer, Mark, Waverly Tseng, Soobin Yim, Thomas Webster, Sharin Jacob, Qian Du & Tamara Tate
    2023 The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing. . 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu, Wei & Xiao Tan
    2024 Beyond words: L2 writing teachers’ visual conceptualizations of ChatGPT in teaching and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing. . 10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101110
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101110 [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu, Xiaoran & Lee Mei Thien
    2025 Unleashing the power of perceived enjoyment: Exploring Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ intention to use ChatGPT for English learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education(). –. 10.1108/JARHE‑12‑2023‑0555
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0555 [Google Scholar]
  50. Yan, Da. & Shuxian Zhang
    2024 L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications(). –. 10.1057/s41599‑024‑03543‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y [Google Scholar]
  51. Yan, Da
    2024 Collaborative processing of ChatGPT-generated feedback: Effects on L2 writing task improvement and learning. Language Learning & Technology(). –. 10.64152/10125/73597
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73597 [Google Scholar]
  52. Yancey, Kathleen B.
    1994Voices on voice: Perspectives, definitions, inquiry. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Yang, Lu & Riu Li
    2024 ChatGPT for L2 learning: Current status and implications. System. . 10.1016/j.system.2024.103351
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103351 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zeevy-Solovey, Orit
    2024 Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning(). –. 10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1482
    https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1482 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zheng, Yi, Yabing Wang, Kelly Shu-Xia Liu & Michael Yi-Chao Jiang
    2024 Examining the moderating effect of motivation on technology acceptance of generative AI for English as a foreign language learning. Education and Information Technologies. –. 10.1007/s10639‑024‑12763‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12763-3 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25001.pre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25001.pre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error