1887
image of Meet the experts on the war in Ukraine

Abstract

This study explores the selection and representation of expert voices in the coverage of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict by mapping the linguistic and stylistic choices editors make when soliciting the opinions of academic, professional or independent sources. It uses a representative dataset of articles from a range of elite English-language opinion-making news outlets (the BBC, CNN, Euronews, the Independent, the Irish Times, the National Post, and Newsweek), sourced between February 2022 and June 2024. It identifies salient patterns of how (not so diverse) experts on the war in Ukraine are introduced as sources of credible information and newsworthy opinion. It illustrates how both credibility and newsworthiness (realized mainly through linguistic markers of eliteness) are discursively constructed through a range of strategies of naming and characterizing the sources and representing their speech directly or via editorializing. In the opinion-making news media, these linguistic patterns of source and voice representation have a bearing on the sense of validity of argumentation, the projection of neutrality, and the creation of audience engagement.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25019.van
2026-05-26
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/etc.25019.van/etc.25019.van.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25019.van&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arcimavičienė, Liudmila
    2025 How direct discourse shapes war news coverage. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. , 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101403
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101403 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, Stuart
    2004News culture. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan, Stuart & Barbie Zelizer
    (eds.) 2004Reporting war: Journalism in wartime. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203497562
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203497562 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bednarek, Monika
    2006Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 Voices and values in the news: News media talk, news values and attribution. Discourse, Context & Media. –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bednarek, Monika & Helen Caple
    2017The discourse of news values: How news organizations create newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bednarek, Monika & Maite Taboada
    2025 Attitude in reported and non-reported news: A critique of sentiment analysis in corpus pragmatics. Corpus Pragmatics. 10.1007/s41701‑025‑00185‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-025-00185-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bell, Allan & Peter Garrett
    (eds.) 1996Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Berkowitz, Daniel A.
    2019 Reporters and their sources. InKarin Wahl-Jorgensen & Thomas Hanitzsch (eds.), The handbook of journalism studies, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315167497‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497-11 [Google Scholar]
  10. Borissova Saleh, Alexandra
    2024 “The death of experts.” Sourcing science journalism in a state-controlled media environment. InFelicity Mellor (ed.), Insights on science journalism, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brighton, Paul & Dennis Foy
    2007News values. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446216026
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216026 [Google Scholar]
  12. Calsamiglia, Helena & Carmen Ferrero Lopez
    2003 Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies(). –. 10.1177/1461445603005002308
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002308 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cap, Piotr
    2021The discourse of conflict and crisis: Poland’s political rhetoric in the European perspective. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cockcroft, Robert
    2004 Putting Aristotle to the proof: Style, substance and the EPL group. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics(). –. 10.1177/0963947004044871
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004044871 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dijk, Teun A. van
    1988News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekstrom, Mats
    2002 Epistemologies of TV journalism. Journalism(). –. 10.1177/146488490200300301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300301 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Media discourse. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Feez, Susan, Rick Iedema & Peter White
    2008Media literacy. Surry Hills, NSW: Adult Migrant Education Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fröhlich, Romy
    2018 Introduction: media’s role in the creation of knowledge and images of wars: More relevant and more complicated than ever. InRomy Fröhlich (ed.), Media in war and armed conflict: The dynamics of conflict news production and dissemination, –. New York and London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315168241‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168241-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Galtung, Johan & Mari Ruge
    1965 The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four foreign newspapers. Journal of International Peace Research. –. 10.1177/002234336500200104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson, Rhonda & Dolf Zillmann
    1993 The impact of quotation in news reports on issue perception. Journalism Quarterly(). –. 10.1177/107769909307000405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000405 [Google Scholar]
  22. Haarman, Louann & Linda Lombardo
    (eds.) 2009Evaluation and stance in war news: A linguistic analysis of American, British and Italian television news reporting of the 2003 Iraqi war. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Honnibal, Matthew, Ines Montani, Sofie Van Landeghem & Adriane Boyd
    2020spaCy: Industrial-strength natural language processing in Python. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.1212303
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212303 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jensen, Eric
    2012 Scientific sensationalism in American and British press coverage of therapeutic cloning. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly(). –. 10.1177/1077699011428592
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011428592 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lanham, Richard
    2006The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Leeuwen, Theo van
    2007 Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication(). –. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mammadov, Rashad
    2024Voices from Ukraine: Journalists in, from and about the war. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑68850‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68850-8 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mellor, Felicity
    2015 Non-news values in science journalism. InBrian Rappert & Brian Balmer (eds.), Absence in science, security and policy: From research agendas to global strategy, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137493736_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493736_5 [Google Scholar]
  29. Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
    2013 Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of sensationalism in news headlines. Discourse & Communication(). –. 10.1177/1750481312471668
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312471668 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2025 Social actors and storylines in the coverage of Russian-Ukrainian war in English and Polish-language tabloids. Journalism Studies(). –. 10.1080/1461670X.2025.2567889
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2025.2567889 [Google Scholar]
  31. Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna, & Isabela-Anda Dragomir
    2025 Demystifying, delegitimizing, debunking: Discursive editorial strategies of neutralizing the rationales for Russia’s intervention in Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict. 10.1177/17506352251314876
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352251314876 [Google Scholar]
  32. Montgomery, Martin
    2007The discourse of broadcast news. A linguistic approach. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203006634
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006634 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mushin, Ilana
    2013 Making knowledge visible in discourse: Implications for the study of linguistic evidentiality. Discourse Studies(). –. 10.1177/1461445613501447
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501447 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nylund, Mats
    2003 Quoting in front-page journalism: Illustrating, evaluating and confirming the news. Media, Culture & Society(). –. 10.1177/0163443703256007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443703256007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pantti, Mervi
    (ed.) 2016Media and the Ukraine crisis: Hybrid media practices and narratives of conflict. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑1‑4539‑1878‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1878-4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Piazza, Roberta
    2008 “This is a war of words”: News is reporting what was said: techniques for attribution in Italian TG5 and RAI1, American CBS and BBC newsreaders’ and reporters’ discourse of the 2003 Iraq war. InLouann Haarman & Linda Lombardo (eds.), Iraq war on television, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Prior, Markus
    2013 Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science. –. 10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑100711‑135242
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 [Google Scholar]
  38. Richardson, John
    2007Analyzing newspapers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20968‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Scott, Mike
    2024 WordSmith tools (version 9.0) Lexical Analysis Software. https://www.lexically.net/downloads/version9/index.html
  40. Semino, Elena & Mick Short
    2004Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
  41. Taboada, Maite
    2025 Reported speech and gender in the news: Who is quoted, how are they quoted, and why it matters. Discourse & Communication(). –. 10.1177/17504813241281713
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241281713 [Google Scholar]
  42. Taylor, Charlotte
    2010 Science in the news: a diachronic perspective. Corpora(). –. 10.3366/cor.2010.0106
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0106 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thompson, John B.
    1995The media and modernity: A social theory of media. London: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Vandelanotte, Lieven
    2009Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215373
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215373 [Google Scholar]
  45. Verbytska, Anna
    2024 Topic modelling as a method for framing analysis of news coverage of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022–2023. Language & Communication. –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2024.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  46. Watanabe, Kohei
    2017 The spread of the Kremlin’s narratives by a Western news agency during the Ukraine crisis. The Journal of International Communication(). –. 10.1080/13216597.2017.1287750
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2017.1287750 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilk, Przemysław & Corina Selejan
    2026 A threat at your doorstep: A case study in the media coverage of the Russian-Ukrainian war. International Review of Pragmatics().
    [Google Scholar]
  48. World News API
    World News API (n.d.). https://worldnewsapi.com/docs/
  49. Wozniak, Antal, Zixiu Liu & Fabienne Lind
    2024 Media coverage of the Russo-Ukraine war beyond the West: Geopolitics and mainstream news in Brazil, India and South Africa. Media, War & Conflict10.1177/17506352241302244
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241302244 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25019.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/etc.25019.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error