1887
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this article we present functional-structural and information structure arguments for recognizing specificational clefts, i.e. clefts that specify a value for a variable. We distinguish two types which hinge on whether the matrix is a listing or a canonical existential. Listing clefts enumerate one or more instances as corresponding to the variable, e.g. Quantifyingclefts indicate the quantity of instantiation of the variable, e.g. .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.07dav
2016-06-20
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bicler, Chris & Kristin Davidse
    2010 It-clefts in casual conversational English: The weakening of their specificational meaning. InDistinctions in English Grammar. Offered to Renaat Declerck, Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds). Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 260–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Budts, Sara , Michelle Peeters & Elisah Van Lommel
    2013 Existential there-clefts revisited. Unpublished term paper. University of Leuven.
  3. Carlson, Greg
    1978Reference to Kinds in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet
    2000Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins, Peter
    1991Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203202463
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202463 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1992 Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences14: 419–433. doi: 10.1016/0388‑0001(92)90024‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(92)90024-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2006 It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics38: 1706–1720. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crystal, David
    1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davidse, Kristin
    1992 Existential constructions: A systemic perspective. Leuvense Bijdragen81: 71–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1999a Are there sentences that can be analyzed as there-clefts?InThinking English Grammar: To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus , Guy Tops , Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds). Leuven: Peeters, 177–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1999b The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics10: 203–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2000 A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics38: 1101–1131. doi: 10.1515/ling.2000.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2000.022 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004 The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. InLanguage, Culture and Mind. CSDL 2002, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Davidse, Kristin & Ditte Kimps
    2014 Distinguishing and subclassifying there-clefts. Paper presented at ICAME 35. Nottingham, 29 April–4 May 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Declerck, Renaat
    1984 The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua64: 251–289. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(84)90065‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(84)90065-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Delin, Judy
    1992 Properties of it-cleft presupposition. Journal of Semantics9: 289–306. doi: 10.1093/jos/9.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/9.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gentens, Caroline
    2015 The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics22. www.arts.kuleuven.be/ling/workingpapers (Last accessed on24 December 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, M.A.K
    1967a Notes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics3: 199–244. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700016613
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1967bIntonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783111357447
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 [Google Scholar]
  20. 1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, M.A.K. & William Greaves
    2008Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hedberg, Nancy
    2000 The referential status of clefts. Language76: 891–920. doi: 10.2307/417203
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417203 [Google Scholar]
  25. Higgins, Francis
    1973 The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
  26. Huddleston, Rodney
    1984Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165785
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165785 [Google Scholar]
  27. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
    2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaltenböck, Gunther
    2004It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English: A Study of Syntax in Spoken and Written Texts. Wien: Braumüller.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2001 A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics39: 463–516. doi: 10.1515/ling.2001.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.021 [Google Scholar]
  31. Langacker, Ronald
    1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McGregor, William
    1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nichols, Johanna
    1978 Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings 4:114–127. doi: 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2216
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2216 [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Grady, Gerard
    2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Patten, Amanda
    2012 The historical development of the it-cleft: A comparison of two different approaches. Studies in Language36: 548–575. doi: 10.1075/sl.36.3.04pat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.3.04pat [Google Scholar]
  36. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rando, Emily & Donna Napoli
    1978 Definites in there-sentences. Language54: 300–313. doi: 10.2307/412949
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412949 [Google Scholar]
  38. Reeve, Matthew
    2011 The syntactic structure of English clefts. Lingua121: 142–171. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stalnaker, Robert
    2002 Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy25: 701–721. doi: 10.1023/A:1020867916902
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tench, Paul
    1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110918199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918199 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/etc.9.1.07dav
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error