The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
  • ISSN 1874-8767
  • E-ISSN: 1874-8775
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In this study we take an ‘above the clause’ perspective on the conceptualisation of complex events of Irish English and Modern Irish within a functional Role and Reference Grammar perspective, using corpus based data. Functional models of language generally assume some layered structure of the clause, the noun phrase and the word. (Nolan 2012a, 2012b; Van Valin 2005). While excellent work has heretofore been achieved at clause level, the description of important linguistic phenomena above the clause has often been somewhat neglected. In this regard, a central part of the grammar of every human language is the encoding of events and their participants in a clause. This motivates an ‘above the clause’ perspective to characterise the balance between uniformity of encoding and variability in encoding within and across languages. In the functional-cognitive paradigm, form and meaning are not separated into self-contained components. Instead, syntactic structures of varying degrees of complexity and abstraction are paired with their corresponding semantic structures. We argue that the interaction of semantic relations with the hierarchy of clausal linkage is at the strongest pole with the semantic relations covering phase and modifying subevents. We also argue that light verb constructions are formed pre-syntactically in the lexicon using and defend this by applying certain criteria as a diagnostic. The function of light verbs in these constructions is to modulate the realisation of event and sub-event semantics into syntax. We provide evidence of the dynamicity in conceptualising a complex event, considered as complex predication across constructions, in Irish English and Modern Irish.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
    2006 Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. InSerial Verb Constructions. A Crosslinguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Gregory S
    2006Auxiliary Verb Constructions (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280315.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Crowley, Terry
    2002Serial Verbs in Oceanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241355.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241355.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Filppula, Markku
    1999The Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Filppula, Markku , Juhani Klemola & Heli Paulasto
    (eds) 2008English and Celtic in Contact (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics 13). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Foley, William A
    2010 Events and serial verb constructions. InComplex Predicates: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–109. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511712234.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenbaum, Sidney
    (ed.) 1996Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hickey, Raymond
    2007Irish English History and Present-Day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551048 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    1993Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kallen, Jeffrey L
    1989 Tense and aspect categories in Irish English. English World-Wide10: 1–39. doi: 10.1075/eww.10.1.02kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.10.1.02kal [Google Scholar]
  11. 1994 English in Ireland. InCambridge History of the English Language, Robert Burchfield (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–196. doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264785.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264785.005 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1997a Irish English: Context and contacts. InFocus on Ireland. (Varieties of English around the World Series G21), Jeffrey Kallen (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–35. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g21.04kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g21.04kal [Google Scholar]
  13. (ed.) 1997bFocus on Ireland. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g21 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kallen, Jeffrey L & John M. Kirk
    2007 ICE Ireland: Local variations on global standards. InCreating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Vol. 1: Synchronic Databases, Joan C. Beal , Karen P. Corrigan , & Hermann L. Moisl (eds). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 121–162. doi: 10.1057/9780230223936_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230223936_6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Nolan, Brian
    2012aThe Structure of Modern Irish: A Functional Account. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012b The GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish-English: GET-passive and GET-recipient variations. InThe Art of Getting: GET Verbs in European Languages from a Synchronic and Diachronic Point of View, Alexandra N. Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (eds). Special Issue of Linguistics 50 (6): 1111–1162.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2014a Complex predicates and light verb constructions in Modern Irish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics (RESLA)27 (1): 140–167. doi: 10.1075/resla.27.1.06nol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.06nol [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014b Encoding transfer, let/allow and permission in Modern Irish: Interaction of causation, event chaining, argument realisation and syntactic variation. InCausation, Permission and Transfer: Argument Realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET Verbs (Studies in Language Companion Series 167), Brian Nolan , Gudrun Rawoens & Elke Diedrichsen(eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13–51. doi: 10.1075/slcs.167.01nol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.01nol [Google Scholar]
  19. Nolan, Brian & Elke Diedrichsen
    (eds) 2013Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in Grammar (Studies in Language Companion Series 145). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.145
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.145 [Google Scholar]
  20. Nolan, Brian , Gudrun Rawoens
    & Elke Diedrichsen 2014Causation, Permission and Transfer: Argument Realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET Verbs (Studies in Language Companion Series 167). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ó Siadhail, Mícheál
    1989Modern Irish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stenson, Nancy
    1993 English influence on Irish: The last 100 years. Journal of Celtic Linguistics2: 107–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tristram, Hildegard L.C
    1999aHow Celtic is Standard English? (Publications of the Institut Lingvisticeskich Issledovanij, Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk). St. Petersburg: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tristram, Hildegard L. C
    1999b ‘The Celtic Englishes’: Zwei grammatische Beispiele zum Problem des Sprachkontaktes zwischen dem Englischen und den keltischen Sprachen. InAkten des zweiten Deutschen Keltologen-Symposiums (Bonn 2.-4. April 1997), Stefan Zimmer , Rolf Ködderitzsch & Arndt Wigger (eds). Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag, 254–276. doi: 10.1515/9783110952650.254
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110952650.254 [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Valin, Robert D
    2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  26. Vennemann, Theo
    2000 English as a ‘Celtic’ language: Atlantic influences from above and from below. InThe Celtic Englishes II, Hildegard L.C. Tristram (ed.). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 399–406.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error