1887
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1568-1491
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9749
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this paper we integrate and reinterpret new data from a set of experiments in our lab in order to tease apart many of the factors thought to influence bilingual processing. Specifically we combine data from studies investigating age of immersion (AoI), manner of acquisition (MoA), proficiency and context of bilingualism to (1) investigate the organization of the bilingual mental lexicon and (2) determine the nature of the interaction between bilingualism and cognitive control. We suggest that a naturalistic MoA promotes the integration of the bilingual lexicon, and that an early AoI per se is somewhat less important (though it tends to lead to a more naturalistic MoA). Further, bilinguals with an integrated bilingual lexicon (i.e., naturalistic learners) only develop cognitive control advantages if they are in a dual-language environment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eurosla.16.01sab
2016-08-11
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abutalebi, J. and Green, D
    2007 “Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control”. Journal of Neurolinguistics20(3): 242–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altarriba, J. and Basnight-Brown.D.M
    2007 “Methodological considerations in performing semantic- and translation-priming experiments across languages”. Behavior Research Methods39(1): 1–18. doi: 10.3758/BF03192839
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192839 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bialystok, E
    1999 “Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind”. Child Development70: 636–644. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8624.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00046 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bialystok, E. and Craik, F
    2010 “Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind”. Current Directions in Psychological Science19 (1): 19–23. doi: 10.1177/0963721409358571
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409358571 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialystok, E. , Craik, F. and Luk, G
    2008 “Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition34 (4): 859–873. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.34.4.859
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012 “Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences16(4): 240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bialystok, E. and Feng, X
    2009 “Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults”. Brain and Language109: 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bialystok, E. and Martin, M.M
    2004 “Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task”. Developmental Science7: 325–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2004.00351.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00351.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Birdsong, D
    1992 “Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition”. Language68: 706–755. doi: 10.1353/lan.1992.0035
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0035 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coderre, E.L. , Van Heuven, W.J.B. and Conklin, K
    2013 “The timing and magnitude of Stroop interference and facilitation in monolinguals and bilinguals”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16 (2): 420–441. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000405
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000405 [Google Scholar]
  11. Correa, M
    2011 “Heritage learners of Spanish: What role does metalinguistic knowledge play in their acquisition of the subjunctive”. InSelected proceedings of the 13th Hispanic linguistics symposium, L. Ortiz (ed.), 128–138. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Costa, A
    2005 “Lexical access in bilingual production” InThe Handbook of Bilingualism, J.F. Kroll and A.M.B. de Groot (eds), 308–325. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Costa, A. , Hernández, M. and Sebastián-Gallés, N
    2008 “Bilingualism aids in conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task”. Cognition106: 59–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dijkstra, T. and van Heuven, W.J.B
    1998 “The BIA model and bilingual word recognition”. InLocalist connectionist approaches to human cognition, J. Grainger and A.M. Jacobs (eds), 189–225. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2002 “The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to system”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition5: 175–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dijkstra, T. , Timmermans, M.P.H. and Schriefers, H.J
    2000 “On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition”. Journal of Memory and Language42(4): 445–464. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2697
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2697 [Google Scholar]
  17. Duñabeitia, J.A. , Perea, M. and Carreiras, M
    2010 “Masked translation priming effects with highly proficient simultaneous bilinguals”. Experimental Psychology57: 98–107. doi: 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000013
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dussias, P.E
    2003 “Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition25(4): 529–557. doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000238 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dussias, E.L. and Piñar, P
    2009 “Sentence parsing in L2 learners: Linguistic and experience-based factors”. InThe new handbook of second language acquisition, W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bathia (eds.), 295–318. Bingley: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dussias, P.E and Sagarra, N
    2007 “The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition10(1): 101–116. doi: 10.1017/S1366728906002847
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002847 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ekiert, M
    2005 “The bilingual brain”. InTeachers College, Columbia University Working Papers In TESOL and Applied Linguistics3(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Emmorey, K. , Luk, G. , Pyers, J.E. and Bialystok, E
    2008 “The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals: Evidence from bimodal bilinguals”. Psychological Science19: 1201–1206. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02224.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02224.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Fabbro, F
    2001 “The bilingual brain: Cerebral representation of languages”. Brain and Language79: 211–222. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2481
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2481 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fan, J. , McCandliss, B.D. , Sommer, T. , Raz, A. and Posner, M.I
    2002 “Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience14(3): 340–347. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361886
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886 [Google Scholar]
  25. Finkbeiner, M. , Forster, K. , Nicol, J. and Nakamura, K
    2004 “The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming”. Journal of Memory and Language51(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flege, J
    2009 “Give input a chance!” InInput matters in SLA, T. Piske and M. Young-Scholten (eds.), 175–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gerard, L.D. and Scarborough, D.L
    1989 “Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15(2): 305–315. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.15.2.305
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.305 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gollan, T.H. , Forster, K. and Frost, R
    1997 “Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23: 1122–1139. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.23.5.1122
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1122 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grainger, J. , Midgely, K. and Holcomb, P.J
    2010 “Re-thinking the bilingual interactive-activation model from a developmental perspective (BIA-d)”. InLanguage Acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems, M. Kail and M. Hickmann (eds), 267–283. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.52.18gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.18gra [Google Scholar]
  30. Green, D.W. and Abutalebi, J
    2013 “Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis”. Journal of Cognitive Psychology25(5): 515–530. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.796377
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377 [Google Scholar]
  31. de Groot, A.M.B. , Delmaar, P. and Lupker, S.J
    2000 “The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A Human Experimental Psychology53A(2): 397–428. doi: 10.1080/713755891
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713755891 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hakuta, K. , Bialystok, E. and Wiley, E
    2003 “Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition”. Psychological Science14(1): 31–38. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.01415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01415 [Google Scholar]
  33. Heidlmayr, K. , Moutier, S. , Hemforth, B. , Courin, C. , Tanzmeister, R. and Isel, F
    2014 “Successive bilingualism and executive functions: The effect of second language use on inhibitory control in a behavioural Stroop Colour Word task”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition17(3): 630–645. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000539 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hernandez, A. , & Li, P
    2007 “Age of acquisition: Its neural and computational mechanisms”. Psychological Bulletin133: 638–650. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.133.4.638
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.638 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hernández, M. , Costa, A. , Fuentes, L.J. , Vivas, A.B. and Sebastián-Gallés, N
    2010 “The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition13(3): 315–325. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hilchey, M.D. and Klein, R.M
    2011 “Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes”. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review18: 625–658. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑011‑0116‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0116-7 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ibrahim, R
    2009 “Selective deficit of second language: A case of Arabic-Hebrew bilingual brain-damaged patient”. Behavioral and Brain Function5(17): 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1744‑9081‑5‑17
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-17 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kennedy, D. and Normal, C
    2005 “What don’t we know?” Science309: 5731.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kousaie, S. and Phillips, N.A
    2012 “Aging and bilingualism: Absence of a “bilingual advantage” in Stroop interference in a non-immigrant sample”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology65(2): 356–369. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.604788
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.604788 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kroll, J.F. , Bobb, S.C. and Wodniecka, Z
    2006 “Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule. Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition9(2): 119–135. doi: 10.1017/S1366728906002483
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002483 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kroll, J.F. , van Hell, J.G. , Tokowicz, N. and Green, D.W
    2010 “The revised hierarchical model: A critical review and assessment”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition13(3): 373–381. doi: 10.1017/S136672891000009X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891000009X [Google Scholar]
  42. Kroll, J.F. and Stewart, E
    1994 “Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations”. Journal of Memory and Language33: 149–174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lapierre, M. , Sabourin, L. , Burkholder, M. , Brien, C. & Leclerc, J-C
    2015 “The language background questionnaire in the Canadian context”. Poster presented at the 10th International Symposium on Bilingualism , New Brunswick, New Jersey.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, L.I. , Mo, L.E.I. , Wang, R. , Luo, X. and Chen, Z.H.E
    2009 “Evidence for long-term cross-language repetition priming in low fluency Chinese/English bilinguals”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition12(1): 13–21. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003453
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003453 [Google Scholar]
  45. Linck, J.A. , Kroll, J.F. and Sunderman, G
    2009 “Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language”. Psychological Science20: 1507–1515. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Luk, G. , De Sa, E. and Bialystok, E
    2011 “Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control?” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition14(4): 588–595. doi: 10.1017/S1366728911000010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000010 [Google Scholar]
  47. Marian, V. and Spivey, M
    2003 “Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition12(1): 13–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Martin-Rhee, M.M. and Bialystok, E
    2008 “The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition11: 81–93. doi: 10.1017/S1366728907003227
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003227 [Google Scholar]
  49. Paap, K.R. and Greenberg, Z.I
    2013 “There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing”. Cognitive Psychology66(2): 232–258. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Paap, K.R. , Johnson, H.A. and Sawi, O
    2014 “Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences?” Journal of Cognitive Psychology26(6): 615–639. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.944914
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.944914 [Google Scholar]
  51. Paradis, M
    2001 “Bilingual and polyglot aphasia”. InHandbook of Neuropsychology, R.S. Berndt (ed.), 69–91. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Pelham, S.D. and Abrams, L
    2014 “Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition40(2): 313–325. doi: 10.1037/a0035224
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035224 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pliatsikas, C. and Marinis, T
    2013 “Processing empty categories in a second language. When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16: 167–182. doi: 10.1017/S136672891200017X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891200017X [Google Scholar]
  54. Rastle, K. , Davis, M.H. , Marslen-Wilson, W.D. and Tyler, L.K
    2000 “Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study”. Language and Cognitive Processes15: 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  55. Reiterer, S.M. , Pareda, E. and Bhattacharya, J
    2009 “Measuring second language proficiency with EEG synchronization: how functional cortical network and hemispheric involvement differ as a function of proficiency level in second language speakers”. Second Language Research25(1): 77–106. doi: 10.1177/0267658308098997
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308098997 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sabourin, L. , Brien, C. and Burkholder, M
    2014a “The effect of age of L2 acquisition on the organization of the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from masked priming”. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 17(3): 542–555. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000643
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000643 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sabourin, L. , Leclerc, J-C. , Burkholder, M. and Brien, C
    2014b “Bilingual lexical organization: Is there a sensitive period?”. Proceedings of the 2014 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association . Available atcla-acl.ca/wp-content/uploads/Sabourin_Leclerc_Burkholder_Brien-2014.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sabourin, L. , Leclerc, J-C. , Lapierre, M. , Burkholder, M. , & Brien, C
    2016 “The language background questionnaire in L2 research: Teasing apart the variables”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association , Calgary, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sabourin, L. and Vīnerte, S
    2015 “The bilingual advantage in the Stroop task: Simultaneous vs. early bilinguals”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition18(2): 350–355. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000704 [Google Scholar]
  60. Silverberg, S. and Samuel, A.G
    2004 “The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words”. Journal of Memory and Language51: 381–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  61. Soares, C. and Grosjean, F
    1984 “Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access”. Memory and Cognition12(4): 380–386. doi: 10.3758/BF03198298
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198298 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tao, L. , Marzecová, A. , Taft, M. , Asanowicz, D. and Wodniecka, Z
    2011 “The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: The role of age of acquisition”. Frontiers in Psychology2: 1–19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00123
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00123 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tremblay, A
    2011 “Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “Clozing” the gap”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition33: 339–372. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000015 [Google Scholar]
  64. Vīnerte, S. , & Sabourin, L
    2015 “Bilingualism and cognitive control: The ANT in a Canadian context”. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association . Available at:cla-acl.ca/wp-content/uploads/Vinerte_Sabourin-2015.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wartenburger, I. , Heekeren, H.R. , Abutalebi, J. , Cappa, S.F. , Villringer, A. and Perani, D
    2003 “Early setting of grammatical processing in the bilingual brain”. Neuron37: 159–170. doi: 10.1016/S0896‑6273(02)01150‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01150-9 [Google Scholar]
  66. Weber-Fox, C.M. and Neville, H.J
    1996 “Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8: 231–256. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.231
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.231 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wu, Y.J. and Thierry, G
    2013 “Fast modulation of executive function by language context in bilinguals”. Journal of Neuroscience33(33): 13533–13537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4760‑12.2013
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4760-12.2013 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/eurosla.16.01sab
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error