1887
Volume 39, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates whether colloquialisation – a stylistic shift by which written genres come to be more similar to spoken genres – has played a role in the endonormativisation of the grammar of Australian English, a variety which has long been noted for its penchant for colloquialism. The study tracks changes in grammatical colloquialism from the early 20th century against the historical backdrop of the progressive decline in Britishness in Australia and the pervasive effects of “Americanisation”. The data are derived from a suite of parallel Brown-family corpora representing British, American, and Australian English of the 1930s, 1960s, 1990s and 2006. Multivariate techniques are used to delimit 26 “colloquial” and “anti-colloquial” grammatical features from a set of 83 potentially relevant features, and to examine changes in their frequencies between 1931 and 2006, in the three varieties, and across the three major genres of fiction, learned writing and press reportage.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00014.col
2018-11-02
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Paul
    2009 “The BE06 Corpus of British English and Recent Language Change”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14: 312–337.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bak [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Sidney
    1959The Drum: Australian Character and Slang. Sydney: Currawong.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, Douglas
    1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2003 “Compressed Noun Phrases in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy”. InJean Aitchison, and Diana Lewis, eds.New Media Language. London: Routledge, 169–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
    1997 “Diachronic Relations among Speech-Based and Written Registers in English”. InTerttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, eds.To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique, 253–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
    2009Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
    2016Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511920776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blair, David
    1993 “Australian English and Australian National Identity”. InGerhard Schultz, ed.The Languages of Australia. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities, 62–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins, Peter
    2015aGrammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.67
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2015b “Diachronic Variation in the Grammar of Australian English: Corpus-Based Explorations”. InPeter Collins, ed.Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 15–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins, Peter, and David Blair
    2000 “Language and Identity in Australia”. InDavid Blair, and Peter Collins, eds.English in Australia. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Collins, Peter, and Xinyue Yao
    2013 “Colloquial Features in World Englishes”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18: 479–505.10.1075/ijcl.18.4.02col
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.02col [Google Scholar]
  14. Crystal, David
    2001Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164771
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164771 [Google Scholar]
  15. Curran, James
    2004The Power of Speech: Australian Prime Ministers Defining the National Image. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hackert, Stephanie, and Dagmar Deuber
    2015 “American Influence on Written Caribeanbean English: A Diachronic Analysis of Newspaper Reportage in the Bahamas and in Trinidad and Tobago”. InPeter Collins, ed.Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 389–410.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hornadge, Bill
    1980The Australian Slanguage. Sydney: Methuen Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hundt, Marianne
    2013 “The Diversification of English: Old, New, and Emerging Epicentres”. InDaniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, eds.English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair
    1999 “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-Based Approach to Language Change in Progress”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 4: 221–242.10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  20. Hundt, Marianne, and Stefanie Dose
    2012 “Differential Change in British and American English: Comparing Pre- and Post-War Data”. InSebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson, and Geoffrey Leech, eds.English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 79–101.10.1163/9789401207478_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207478_007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hundt, Marianne, and Geoffrey Leech
    2012 “Small is Beautiful: On the Value of Standard Reference Corpora for Observing Recent Grammatical Change”. InTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth Traugott, eds.The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hundt, Marianne, Gerold Schneider, and Elena Seoane
    2016 “The Use of the be-Passive in Academic Englishes: Local vs Global Usage in an International Language”. Corpora11: 31–63. [10.3366/corp.2016.0084]10.3366/cor.2016.0084
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0084 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leech, Geoffrey, and Nicholas Smith
    2009 “Change and Constancy in Linguistic Change: How Grammatical Usage in Written English Evolved in the Period 1931–1991”. InAntoinette Renouf, and Andrew Kehoe, eds.Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 173–200.10.1163/9789042025981_011
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042025981_011 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mair, Christian
    2009Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt
    1995 “Why is the Progressive Becoming more Frequent in English? A Corpus-Based Investigation of Language Change in Progress”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik43: 111–122
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Millar, Neil
    2009 “Modal Verbs in TIME. Frequency Changes 1923–2006”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14: 191–220.10.1075/ijcl.14.2.03mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.03mil [Google Scholar]
  28. Moore, Bruce
    2008Speaking our Language: The Story of Australian English. Sydney: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramson, William S.
    1966Australian English: An Historical Study of the Vocabulary, 1788–1898. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rühlemann, Christoph, and Martin Hilpert
    . fc. “Colloquialization in Journalistic Writing: Investigating Inserts in TIME Magazine with a Focus on Well”.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schneider, Edgar
    2007Postcolonial English: Varieties of English around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2014 “New Reflections on the Evolutionary Dynamics of World Englishes”. World Englishes33: 9–32.10.1111/weng.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12069 [Google Scholar]
  33. Seal, Graham
    1999The Lingo: Listening to Australian English. Sydney: UNSW Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ward, Stuart
    2001 “Sentiment and Self-Interest: The Imperial Ideal in Anglo-Australian Commercial Culture”. Australian Historical Studies116: 91–108.10.1080/10314610108596149
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10314610108596149 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilkes, Gerald W.
    1978A Dictionary of Australian Colloquialisms. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1986Exploring Australian English. Sydney: ABC Enterprises.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yao, Xinyue, and Peter Collins
    . fc. “Exploring Grammatical Colloquialisation in Non-Native English: A Case Study of Philippine English”. English Language and Linguistics22.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00014.col
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00014.col
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Australian English , Brown-family , colloquialisation , corpus , diachronic , grammar and normativity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error