Volume 39, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This corpus-based study focuses on the alternation between progressive and non-progressive constructions in native and non-native varieties. We adopt a quantitative-qualitative approach starting with a collostructional analysis of the two constructions to assess association strengths between lexical verbs, semantic domains and Aktionsart categories on the one hand, and progressive and non-progressive constructions on the other hand. We then explore the constructions semantically and qualitatively. Overall, associations between the two constructions and Achievements and Accomplishments on the one hand, and semantic domains other than Activity or Existence on the other, do not unanimously influence writers’ constructional choices. Further, there may not be one single core meaning of the progressive, but rather a complex of meanings activated by the use of the progressive construction. Ultimately, we paint a multifaceted picture of the meanings of the progressive and show the benefit of combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to explore constructional semantics across Englishes.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Biber, Douglas
    2012 “Register as a Predictor of Linguistic Variation”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory8: 9–37.10.1515/cllt‑2012‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1988The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins, Peter
    2008 “The Progressive Aspect in World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study”. Australian Journal of Linguistics28: 225–249.10.1080/07268600802308782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600802308782 [Google Scholar]
  5. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deshors, Sandra C.
    2017 “Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis”. Journal of English Linguistics45: 260–290.10.1177/0075424217717589
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424217717589 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dowty, David R.
    1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards, Alison
    2016English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g56
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g56 [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenacre, Michael
    2007Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2nd ed.Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781420011234
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011234 [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenbaum, Sydney
    1991 “The Development of the International Corpus of English”. InKarin Aijmer, Bengt Alterberg, and Jan Svartvik, eds.English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 83–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gries, Stefan Th
    2014 Coll.analysis 3.5. A Script for R to Compute Perform Collostructional Analyses.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gries, Stefan Th., and Tobias Bernaisch
    2016 “Exploring Epicentres Empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes”. English World-Wide37: 1–25.10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri [Google Scholar]
  13. Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, and Jason Grafmiller
    2017 “Stability and Fluidity in Syntactic Variation World-Wide: The Genitive Alternation Across Varieties of English”. Journal of English Linguistics45: 3–27.10.1177/0075424216685405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216685405 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hundt, Marianne, and Katrin Vogel
    2011 Overuse of the Progressive in ESL and Learner Englishes – Fact or Fiction?InJoybrato Mukherjee, and Marianne Hundt, eds.Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 145–165.10.1075/scl.44.08vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.08vog [Google Scholar]
  15. Kranich, Svenja
    2010Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042031449
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042031449 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kruger, Haidee, and Bertus van Rooy
    2017 “Editorial Practice and the Progressive in Black South African English”. World Englishes36: 20–41.10.1111/weng.12202
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12202 [Google Scholar]
  17. Laitinen, Mikko, and Magnus Levin
    2016 “On the Globalization of English: Observations of Subjective Progressives in Present-day Englishes”. InElena Seoane, and Christina Suárez Gómez, eds.World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 229–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Seung-Ah
    2007 “Ing Forms and the Progressive Puzzle: A Construction-based Approach to English Progressives”. Journal of Linguistics43: 153–195.10.1017/S0022226706004476
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004476 [Google Scholar]
  19. Leech, Geoffrey
    1987Meaning and the English Verb, 2nd ed.London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009Change in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  21. Meriläinen, Lea, Heli Paulasto, and Paula Rautionaho
    2017 “Extended Uses of the Progressive in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes”. InMarkku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, Anna Mauranen, and Svetlana Vetchinnikova, eds.Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter, 191–216.10.1515/9783110429657‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429657-011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nesselhauf, Nadja
    2007 “The Spread of the Progressive and its ‘Future’ Use”. English Language and Linguistics11: 191–207.10.1017/S1360674306002152
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306002152 [Google Scholar]
  23. Paulasto, Heli
    2014 “Extended Uses of the Progressive Form in L1 and L2 Englishes”. English World-Wide35: 247–276.10.1075/eww.35.3.01pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.01pau [Google Scholar]
  24. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rautionaho, Paula
    2014Variation in the Progressive: A Corpus-based Study into World Englishes. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rautionaho, Paula, and Sandra C. Deshors
    2018 “Progressive or not Progressive?: Modeling Constructional Choices in EFL and ESL”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research. Special Issue on Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research4(2): 225–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Römer, Ute
    2005Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts and Didactics. Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.18 [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Rooy, Bertus
    2006 “The Extension of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English”. World Englishes25: 37–64.10.1111/j.0083‑2919.2006.00446.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00446.x [Google Scholar]
  29. 2014 “Progressive Aspect and Stative Verbs in Outer Circle Varieties”. World Englishes33: 157–172.10.1111/weng.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12079 [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Rooy, Bertus, and Caroline Piotrowska
    2015 “The Development of an Extended Time Period Meaning of the Progressive in Black South African English”. InPeter Collins, ed.Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 465–483.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schneider, Gerold
    2008 Hybrid Long-Distance Functional Dependency Parsing. PhD Dissertation, University of Zurich.
  32. Schneider, Gerold, and Marianne Hundt
    2012 “‘Off with Their Heads’: Profiling TAM in ICE corpora”. InMarianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds.Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–34.10.1075/veaw.g43.01sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.01sch [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharma, Devyani
    2009 “Typological Diversity in New Englishes”. English World-Wide30: 170–195.10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith, Carlota S.
    1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7911‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7 [Google Scholar]
  35. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2006 “Distinctive Collexeme Analysis and Diachrony: A Comment”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory2: 257–262.10.1515/CLLT.2006.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2006.013 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8: 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  37. de Swart, Henriëtte
    1998 Aspect Shift and Coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory16: 347–38510.1023/A:1005916004600
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600 [Google Scholar]
  38. Vendler, Zeno
    1957Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review66: 143–160.10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis, Ute Römer, Kathleen BardoviHarlig, and Chelsea J. Leblanc
    2009 “The Acquisition of Tense-Aspect: Converging Evidence from Corpora and Telicity Ratings”. The Modern Language Journal93: 354–369.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00895.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error