1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. English World-Wide
  4. Volume 40, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

L1 background is often described as the main factor accounting for variation in postcolonial ESL varieties. However, recent studies (e.g. Mesthrie 20092017) suggest that variation patterns in ESL varieties can in some cases also be linked to identity factors rooted in local patterns of intergroup relations. This study examines the interrelation between L1 background and such identity factors in the phonetic patterns found in the English varieties spoken in Namibia. The data consist of a corpus of careful style elicited via sociolinguistic interviews from an ethnically stratified sample of L2 English speaking Namibian students with Afrikaans, Bantu languages (Oshiwambo and Otjiherero), and Khoekhoeghowab as L1s. Individual speakers tend to be related in their phonetic behaviors if they share the same L1. However, some features cannot be directly attributed to L1 background, so their distribution is best read against the background of Namibian inter-ethnic relations and ethnolinguistic vitality differentials.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
2019-06-13
2024-10-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adank, Patty, Roel Smits, and Roeland Van Hout
    2004 “A Comparison of Vowel Normalization Procedures for Language Variation Research”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America116: 3099–3107. 10.1121/1.1795335
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1795335 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha, Asif
    2007 Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bekker, Ian
    2014 “The KIT-Split in South African English. A Critical Review”. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Languages Studies32: 113–131. 10.2989/16073614.2014.925222
     https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2014.925222 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, Allan
    2001 “Back in Style: Reworking Audience Design”. InPenelope Eckert, and John Rickford, eds.Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–169.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink
    2019 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 6.0.48. www.praat.org (accessedFebruary 17, 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Botha, Christo
    2007 “Internal Colonization and an Oppressed Minority? The Dynamics of Relations between Germans and Afrikaners against the Background of Constructing a Colonial State in Namibia”. Journal of Namibian Studies2: 7–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourhis, Richard Y., Lena C. Moise, Stephane Perreault, and Sacha Senecal
    1997 “Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach”. International Journal of Psychology32: 369–386. 10.1080/002075997400629
     https://doi.org/10.1080/002075997400629 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowerman, Sean
    2004 “White South African English: Phonology”. InEdgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds.A Handbook of Varieties of English. VolumeI. Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 931–942.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brock-Utne, Birgit, and Hall B. Holmarsdottir
    2001 “The Choice of English as a Medium of Instruction and its Effects on the African Languages in Namibia”. International Review of Education47: 293–322. 10.1023/A:1017905910662
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017905910662 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brugman, Johanna C.
    2009 Segments, Tones and Distribution in Khoekhoe Prosody. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
  11. Buschfeld, Sarah, and Alexander Kautzsch
    2014 “English in Namibia. A First Approach”. English World-Wide35: 121–160. 10.1075/eww.35.2.01bus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.2.01bus [Google Scholar]
  12. Dobell, Lauren
    1998 SWAPO’s Struggle for Namibia, 1960–1991: War by Other Means. Basel: Schlettwein.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubow, Saul
    2014 A History of Apartheid. 1948–1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Finn, Peter
    2004 “Cape Flats English: Phonology”. InEdgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds.A Handbook of Varieties of English. VolumeI. Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 964–984.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fivaz, Derek, and Sakaria Shikomba
    2003 A Reference Grammar of Oshindonga. Windhoek: Out of Africa Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fourie, D. J.
    1991 “Language Conflict in Owamboland”. South African Journal of Linguistics9: 69–73. 10.1080/10118063.1991.9723865
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1991.9723865 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fredericks, Niklaas J.
    2013 A Study of Dialectal and Inter-Linguistic Variations of Khoekhoegowab: Towards the Determination of Khoekhoegowab Orthography. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of the Western Cape.
  18. Giles, Howard
    1979 “Ethnicity Markers in Speech”. InKlaus R. Scherer, and Howard Giles, eds.Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–290.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Giliomee, Hermann, and Lawrence Schlemmer
    1993 From Apartheid to Nation-Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Harlech-Jones, Brian
    1990 ‘You Taught me Language’. The Implementation of English as a Medium of Instruction in Namibia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2001 “Some Prevalent Assumptions in Language Policy, with Contextualisations from Namibia”. InRichard Trewby, and Sandra Fitchat, eds.Language and Development in Southern Africa. Making the Right Choices. Cape Town: Gamsberg McMillan, 25–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2011 “The Black Kenyan English Vowel System. An Acoustic Phonetic Analysis”. English World-Wide: 32: 147–173. 10.1075/eww.32.2.02hof
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.2.02hof [Google Scholar]
  23. Jenkins, Richard
    1997 Rethinking Ethnicity. Arguments and Exploration. 2nd ed.London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kachru, Braj
    2005 Asian Englishes. Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kern, Friederike
    2011 “Introduction”. InFriederike Kern, and Margret Selting, eds.Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–18. 10.1075/silv.8.01ker
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.8.01ker [Google Scholar]
  26. Kioko, Angela N., and Margaret J. Muthwii
    2003 “English Variety for the Public Domain in Kenya. Speakers’ Attitudes and Views”. Language, Culture and Curriculum16: 130–145. 10.1080/07908310308666662
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310308666662 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kleinz, Norbert
    1984 Deutsche Sprache im Kontakt in Südwest-Afrika: Der heutige Gebrauch der Sprachen Deutsch, Afrikaans und Englisch in Namibia. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, William
    1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 1994 Principles of Linguistic Change. Internal Factors. London: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 2001 Principles of Linguistic Change. Social Factors. London: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lanham, Len W., and C. A. Macdonald
    1979 The Standard in South African English and its Social History. Heidelberg: Groos. 10.1075/veaw.g1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lim, Lisa
    2007 “Mergers and Acquisitions: On the Ages and Origins of Singapore English Particles”. World Englishes26: 446–473. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2007.00522.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00522.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Maho, Jounie F.
    1998 Few People, Many Tongues. The Languages of Namibia. Windhoek: Gamsberg McMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Meierkord, Christiane
    2012 Interactions across Englishes. Linguistic Choices in Local and International Contact Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139026703
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026703 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mesthrie, Rajend
    2006 “Contact Linguistics and World Englishes”. InBraj Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, and Cecil Nelson, eds.The Handbook of World Englishes. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 273–288. 10.1002/9780470757598.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757598.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2009 “Socio-Phonetics and Social Change: Deracialisation of the GOOSE Vowel in South African English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics14: 3–33. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00433.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00433.x [Google Scholar]
  37. 2014 “The Sociophonetic Effects of ‘Event X’: Post-Apartheid Black South African English in Multicultural Contact with Other South African Englishes”. InSarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds.The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 58–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 2017 “Class, Gender, and Substrate Erasure in Sociolinguistic Change: A Sociophonetic Study of Schwa in Deracializing South African English”. Language93: 314–346. 10.1353/lan.2017.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0016 [Google Scholar]
  39. Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G., Lutz Marten, and Jekura U. Kavari
    2002 A Grammatical Sketch of Herero (Otjiherero). Köln: Köppe.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Muysken, Pieter
    2000 Bilingual Speech. A Typology of Language Mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 2013 “Language Contact Outcomes as the Result of Bilingual Optimization Strategies”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16: 1–22. 10.1017/S1366728912000727
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000727 [Google Scholar]
  42. Namibia Statistics Agency
    Namibia Statistics Agency 2003 “Namibia 2001”. Population and Housing Census. Windhoek: National Planning Commission.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Namibia Statistics Agency
    Namibia Statistics Agency 2012 “Namibia 2011”. Population and Housing Census Main Report. Windhoek: Namibia Statistics Agency.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ortega, Lourdes
    2009 Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Pendleton, Wade
    1993 Katutura: A Place Where we Stay. Life in a Post-Apartheid Township in Namibia. Katutura Before and Now. Windhoek: Gamsberg McMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Peyroux, Elisabeth
    2004 Windhoek, capitale de la Namibie. Changement politique et recomposition des périphéries. Johannesburg: IFAS.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ponelis, Fritz
    1993 The Development of Afrikaans. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Prinsloo, K. P., D. J. Stoker, A. M. Lubbe, A. E. Strydom, H. A. Engelbrecht, and D. P. van Vuuren
    1982 Aspekte van taal- en kommunikasie-aangeleenthede in SWA/Namibië. Vols.1–13. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Rampton, Ben
    2014 Crossing. Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Rickford, John R., and Penelope Eckert
    2001 “Introduction”. InPenelope Eckert, and John Rickford, eds.Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Schmid, Sabine
    2002 Affirmative Action as a Tool for Transformation. The Case of South Africa and Namibia. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmied, Josef J.
    1991 “National and Subnational Features in Kenyan English”. InJenny Cheshire, ed.English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 420–431. 10.1017/CBO9780511611889.029
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611889.029 [Google Scholar]
  53. Schneider, Edgar W.
    2007 Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  54. Stals, Ernst, and Fritz Ponelis
    2001 Só het Afrikaans na Namibië gekom: Afrikaans-Hollands in Namibië vóór die koloniale tyd. Windhoek: Gamsberg McMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Stell, Gerald
    2016 “Current Trends in Linguistic Diversity in Post-Apartheid Windhoek: A Qualitative Appraisal”. Language Matters47: 326–348. 10.1080/10228195.2016.1229360
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2016.1229360 [Google Scholar]
  56. Thomas, Erik R., and Tyler Kendall
    2007 NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite. ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/ (accessedMarch 5, 2019).
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Thomason, Sarah
    2001 Language Contact. An Introduction. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Trudgill, Peter, and Jean Hannah
    2013 International English. A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English. 5th ed.London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. United Nations Institute for Namibia (UNIN)
    United Nations Institute for Namibia (UNIN) 1981 Toward a Language Policy for Namibia. English as the Official Language: Perspectives and Strategies. Lusaka: UNIN.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Rooy, Bertus
    2004 “Black South African English. Phonology”. InEdgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds.A Handbook of Varieties of English. VolumeI. Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Van Rooy, Bertus, and Gerhard Van Huyssteen
    2002 “The Vowels of BSAE: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects”. South African Journal of Linguistics18sup38: 15–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Watermeyer, Susan
    1996 “Afrikaans English”. InVivian De Klerk, ed.Focus on South Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99–124. 10.1075/veaw.g15.08wat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g15.08wat [Google Scholar]
  63. Wells, John C.
    1982 Accents of English I. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611759
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611759 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wimmer, Andreas
    2008 “The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory”. American Journal of Sociology113: 970–1022. 10.1086/522803
     https://doi.org/10.1086/522803 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wissing, Daan P.
    2002 “Black South African English: A New English? Observations from a Phonetic Viewpoint”. World Englishes21: 129–144. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00236
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00236 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2013 “Akoestiese ontleding van die vokale van bruin en wit jong, vroulike sprekers van Afrikaans”. Litnet Akademies: ’n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe10: 304–340.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 2014 “Fonetiek”. InWannie Carstens, and Nerina Bosman, eds.Kontemporêre Afrikaanse Taalkunde. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 91–125.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Yagmur, Kutlay, and Martin Ehala
    2011 “Tradition and Innovation in the Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development32: 101–110. 10.1080/01434632.2010.541913
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.541913 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
Loading
Intergroup dynamics and variation in postcolonial ESL varieties
English World-Wide 40, 144 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ethnicity; gender; language contact; Namibia; sociolinguistics; sociophonetics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error